• EEA geospatial data catalogue
  •   Search
  •   Map
  •  Sign in

EUNIS habitat type F3.1a, predicted habitat suitability - version 1, June 2016

The modelled suitability for the EUNIS habitat type is an indication of where conditions are favourable for the habitat type based on sample plot data (Braun-Blanquet database) and the Maxent software package. The modelled suitability map may be used as a proxy for the geographical distribution of the habitat type. Note however that it is not representing the actual distribution of the habitat type.

Also note that predictions are less reliable due to data deficiency in the eastern part of Europe, and to a lesser extent to the Scandinavian countries.

Geographic restriction for plot observations: n/a

Remarks: -Prediction in eastern part of Europe (Caucasus, Türkiye) uncertain due to lack of data for that area.

Simple

Identification info

Date (Publication)
2016-07-01
Date (Creation)
2016-07-06
Edition

01

Citation identifier
eea_r_3035_1_km_eunis-hab-f3-1a_p_1940-2011_v01_r00

Status
Obsolete
Point of contact
Organisation Individual Electronic mail address Website Role

European Environment Agency

sdi@eea.europa.eu

http://www.eea.europa.eu

Point of contact

European Environment Agency

sdi@eea.europa.eu

Custodian
Spatial representation type
Grid

Spatial resolution

Spatial resolution
1 km
Topic category
  • Biota

Extent

N
S
E
W




Extent

Temporal extent

Time period
1940-01-01 2011-12-31
Maintenance and update frequency
Unknown
EEA topics
  • Biodiversity

GEMET - INSPIRE themes, version 1.0
  • Habitats and biotopes

GEMET
  • natural area

  • tundra

  • terrestrial ecosystem

  • heathland

Place
  • Europe

Resource constraints

Use limitation

License CC-BY 4.0 ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Copyright holder: European Environment Agency (EEA).

Resource constraints

Access constraints
Other restrictions
Other constraints
no limitations to public access
Language
English
Character encoding
UTF8

Distribution Information

Distribution format
  • GeoTIFF

OnLine resource

https://sdi.eea.europa.eu/webdav/datastore/public/eea_r_3035_1_km_eunis-hab-f3-1a_p_1940-2011_v01_r00/

OnLine resource

Direct download

Data quality info

Hierarchy level
Dataset

Report

Result

Title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services

Date (Publication)
2010-12-08
Explanation

See the referenced specification

Resource lineage

Statement

The database compiled for the Braun-Blanquet project is a compilation of various national and regional vegetation databases. The maintenance of these databases is in principle in the hands of the custodians. However, before uploading the databases into Braun-Blanquet database a quality check is performed by Alterra and Masaryk University. If possible, detected errors are corrected and reported back to the data provider. For the modelling of the habitat suitability map the Maxent software is used ( http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~schapire/maxent/). The grid values in the map represent the probability (ranging from 0-1) that the cell is suitable for the habitat.

The grid file represents the habitat suitability of the EUNIS type. For the modelling the widely used software Maxent for maximum entropy modelling of species’ geographic distributions was used. Maxent is a general-purpose machine-learning method with a simple and precise mathematical formulation, and has a number of aspects that make it well-suited for species distribution modelling when only presence (occurrence) data but not absence data are available (Philips et al. 2006). Because EUNIS habitats have a particular species composition, they are assumed to respond to specific ecological requirements, allowing us to generate correlative estimates of geographic distributions. Modelling habitats that have been floristically defined is a well-known procedure for ecological modelling at local scales, and a promising technique to be applied also at the continental level.

The Maxent method considers presence data (known observations of a given entity) and the so-called background data. Background data comprise a set of points used to describe the environmental variation of the study area according to the available environmental layers. It is assumed that these layers represent well the most important ecological gradients on a European scale. As layers the following environmental parameters have been used: Potential Evapotranspiration, Topsoil pH, Solar radiation, Temperature Seasonality (standard deviation *100), Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarter, Annual Precipitation, Precipitation Seasonality (Coefficient of Variation), Precipitation of Warmest Quarter & Distance to water (rivers, lakes, sea).

Statistical output of the model:

#Training samples: 261

Regularized training gain: 1.451

Unregularized training gain: 1.6818

Iterations: 500

Training AUC: 0.9294

#Test samples: 28

Test gain: 1.6294

Test AUC: 0.9168

AUC Standard Deviation: 0.0248

#Background points: 5261

bio_12_etrs2_ras contribution: 16.9278

bio_15_etrs2_ras contribution: 1.7383

bio_18_etrs2_ras contribution: 3.0896

bio_4_etrs2_ras contribution: 47.2878

bio_8_etrs2_ras contribution: 1.1727

bld_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 2.8954

cecsum_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 0.1047

clyppt_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 0.2259

crfvol_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 4.1454

dist2water1km contribution: 0.0476

orcdrc_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 0.8552

pet_he_yr contribution: 11.6802

phihox_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 0.3306

sltppt_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 0.4748

sndppt_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 2.8708

solar_1km contribution: 6.1532

bio_12_etrs2_ras permutation importance: 11.098

bio_15_etrs2_ras permutation importance: 1.4671

bio_18_etrs2_ras permutation importance: 3.3948

bio_4_etrs2_ras permutation importance: 39.0025

bio_8_etrs2_ras permutation importance: 0.9225

bld_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 2.9407

cecsum_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 0.3514

clyppt_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 1.0385

crfvol_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 13.2838

dist2water1km permutation importance: 0.3511

orcdrc_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 2.4478

pet_he_yr permutation importance: 15.1798

phihox_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 2.9375

sltppt_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 2.438

sndppt_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 0.9287

solar_1km permutation importance: 2.2179

Entropy: 7.1344

Prevalence (average of logistic output over background sites): 0.1155

Fixed cumulative value 1 cumulative threshold: 1

Fixed cumulative value 1 logistic threshold: 0.0186

Fixed cumulative value 1 area: 0.5052

Fixed cumulative value 1 training omission: 0.0115

Fixed cumulative value 1 test omission: 0.0357

Fixed cumulative value 1 binomial probability: 5.91E-07

Fixed cumulative value 5 cumulative threshold: 5

Fixed cumulative value 5 logistic threshold: 0.0954

Fixed cumulative value 5 area: 0.3203

Fixed cumulative value 5 training omission: 0.0307

Fixed cumulative value 5 test omission: 0.0357

Fixed cumulative value 5 binomial probability: 1.40E-13

Fixed cumulative value 10 cumulative threshold: 10

Fixed cumulative value 10 logistic threshold: 0.1694

Fixed cumulative value 10 area: 0.2387

Fixed cumulative value 10 training omission: 0.0651

Fixed cumulative value 10 test omission: 0.1071

Fixed cumulative value 10 binomial probability: 2.35E-16

Minimum training presence cumulative threshold: 0.5143

Minimum training presence logistic threshold: 0.0103

Minimum training presence area: 0.587

Minimum training presence training omission: 0

Minimum training presence test omission: 0.0357

Minimum training presence binomial probability: 2.51E-05

10 percentile training presence cumulative threshold: 18.2675

10 percentile training presence logistic threshold: 0.2609

10 percentile training presence area: 0.1671

10 percentile training presence training omission: 0.0996

10 percentile training presence test omission: 0.1786

10 percentile training presence binomial probability: 8.34E-21

Equal training sensitivity and specificity cumulative threshold: 22.3303

Equal training sensitivity and specificity logistic threshold: 0.3025

Equal training sensitivity and specificity area: 0.1426

Equal training sensitivity and specificity training omission: 0.1418

Equal training sensitivity and specificity test omission: 0.2143

Equal training sensitivity and specificity binomial probability: 1.08E-22

Maximum training sensitivity plus specificity cumulative threshold: 18.2675

Maximum training sensitivity plus specificity logistic threshold: 0.2609

Maximum training sensitivity plus specificity area: 0.1671

Maximum training sensitivity plus specificity training omission: 0.0996

Maximum training sensitivity plus specificity test omission: 0.1786

Maximum training sensitivity plus specificity binomial probability: 8.34E-21

Equal test sensitivity and specificity cumulative threshold: 16.6662

Equal test sensitivity and specificity logistic threshold: 0.2475

Equal test sensitivity and specificity area: 0.1785

Equal test sensitivity and specificity training omission: 0.0958

Equal test sensitivity and specificity test omission: 0.1786

Equal test sensitivity and specificity binomial probability: 3.20E-19

Maximum test sensitivity plus specificity cumulative threshold: 36.3306

Maximum test sensitivity plus specificity logistic threshold: 0.4278

Maximum test sensitivity plus specificity area: 0.0842

Maximum test sensitivity plus specificity training omission: 0.2759

Maximum test sensitivity plus specificity test omission: 0.2143

Maximum test sensitivity plus specificity binomial probability: 4.69E-41

Balance training omission, predicted area and threshold value cumulative threshold: 3.5127

Balance training omission, predicted area and threshold value logistic threshold: 0.072

Balance training omission, predicted area and threshold value area: 0.3592

Balance training omission, predicted area and threshold value training omission: 0.0192

Balance training omission, predicted area and threshold value test omission: 0.0357

Balance training omission, predicted area and threshold value binomial probability: 1.25E-11

Equate entropy of thresholded and original distributions cumulative threshold: 10.0342

Equate entropy of thresholded and original distributions logistic threshold: 0.1695

Equate entropy of thresholded and original distributions area: 0.2384

Equate entropy of thresholded and original distributions training omission: 0.0651

Equate entropy of thresholded and original distributions test omission: 0.1071

Equate entropy of thresholded and original distributions binomial probability: 2.18E-16

Hierarchy level
Dataset
Source
  • EUNIS habitat type F3-1a distribution based on vegetation plot data - version 1, June 2016

Reference System Information

Reference System Information

Code
EPSG:3035

Metadata

Metadata identifier
cb23d43e-5495-4ab9-861e-1c2d13db33e2

Language
English
Character encoding
UTF8
Contact
Organisation Individual Electronic mail address Website Role

European Environment Agency

sdi@eea.europa.eu

Point of contact

Type of resource

Resource type
Dataset
Metadata linkage

https://sdi.eea.europa.eu/geonetwork/srv/api/records/cb23d43e-5495-4ab9-861e-1c2d13db33e2

Date info (Creation)
2016-06-15T13:21:52Z
Date info (Revision)
2025-10-09T11:15:00.312981Z

Metadata standard

Title

ISO 19115/19139

Edition

1.0

 
 
Access to the catalogue
Read here the full details and access to the data.

Overviews

Spatial extent

Keywords

EEA topics

Biodiversity
GEMET

heathland natural area terrestrial ecosystem tundra
GEMET - INSPIRE themes, version 1.0

Habitats and biotopes


Provided by

Access to the catalogue
Read here the full details and access to the data.




  •   About
  •   Github
  •