# eu_impactDescription

IDimpactDescription: 32_0
IDspecies: 32
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
description:
Kelia grėsmę plačiažnypliams vėžiams, su kuriais konkuruoja dėl maisto ir buveinių. Perneša vėžių maro sukėlėjus. Užimtose buveinėse juos visiškai išnaikinti praktiškai neįmanoma. Daro neigiamą poveikį vandens augalams ir bestuburiams.


IDimpactDescription: 9_0
IDspecies: 9
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
description:
in a mesocosm environment, the species clips the aquatic vegetation efficiently (research at the University of Antwerp - by Jonas Schoelynck)


IDimpactDescription: 0_0
IDspecies: 0
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
description:
There are only rare observations of the species, so it has no impact on the protected species niether habitats or ecosystem services.


IDimpactDescription: 2_0
IDspecies: 2
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
description:
There are only a few locations where the species has been recorded, so there is no evidence on serious impact on the protected species, habitats or ecosystem services. Guidelines for the action plan for the management of Common milkweed has been prepared to prevent the impact in the future (http://www.mop.gov.si/fileadmin/mop.gov.si/pageuploads/podrocja/invazivke/sirska_svilnica_strokovne_podlage.pdf )


IDimpactDescription: 8_0
IDspecies: 8
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
description:
There is no evidence that the species has any impact in Slovenia. Data on presence of Elodea nuttallii are gathered in the framework of gathering data needed for the evaluation of the ecological status of surface waters in accordance with the EU Water framework Directive.   


IDimpactDescription: 42_0
IDspecies: 42
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
description:
The grey squirrel outcompetes the native red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) for food and space causing a decline in red squirrel populations. It can also carry the Squirrel Pox Virus (SQPV) which does not affect it but is lethal to infected red squirrels. Grey squirrels also cause economic damage in woods through bark stripping with damage levels greatest in plantations of sycamore, beech and oak. Financial cost of damage is estimated at €4.5 million per year for the island of Ireland.


IDimpactDescription: 4_0
IDspecies: 4
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
description:
Wpływ na gospodarkę
W obrębie polskiego stanowiska obserwowano zarastanie przepustu pomiędzy zbiornikami.


IDimpactDescription: 11_1
IDspecies: 11
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
description:
Wpływ na gospodarkę
Obecnie gatunek nie zagraża istotnie uprawom zbóż i roślin okopowych, choć znane są przypadki lokalnej ekspansji na polach ziemniaków. Gatunek może powodować zarastanie łąk i pastwisk, utrudnia zabiegi agrotechniczne na terenach, na których występuje. Na niebezpieczny kontakt z gatunkiem narażone są zwierzęta hodowlane i domowe, zwłaszcza o jasnym umaszczeniu. Oparzeniom najczęściej ulegają jasne części ciała, u krów – wymiona, a u psów – okolice nosa. Spożycie dojrzałych, surowych liści gatunku przez krowy może powodować poparzenia układu pokarmowego i krwawe biegunki, w konsekwencji prowadząc do strat w pogłowiu bydła. Zatrucia obserwowano również u owiec.


IDimpactDescription: 32_0
IDspecies: 32
IDreport: DK-2015-2018
country: DK
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/dk/eu/ias/envxl8tna
description:
Has made once deep narrow streams,  wider and less deep. This locally effects populations of salmo trutta


IDimpactDescription: 16_0
IDspecies: 16
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
description:
Wpływ na środowisko przyrodnicze
Na podkreślenie zasługuje fakt, że oddziaływanie gatunku dotyczy przede wszystkim zbiorowisk przewodnich dla siedlisk przyrodniczych objętych ochroną w UE. Są to głównie ziołorośla górskie i ziołorośla nadrzeczne (kod 6430), a w niższych położeniach górskich także pionierska roślinność na kamieńcach górskich potoków (3220). W przypadku siedlisk leśnych oddziaływanie dotyczy głównie łęgów wierzbowych, topolowych, olszowych i jesionowych (91E0). Z obszaru Polski znane są również przypadki pojawiania się niecierpka gruczołowatego na powierzchniach nieużytkowanych łąk, w tym także zaliczanych do chronionych typów siedlisk przyrodniczych, jak m.in. zmiennowilgotne łąki trzęślicowe (6410). Ponadto, obecność niecierpka gruczołowatego odnotowano w innych chronionych typach siedlisk przyrodniczych, należą do nich: torfowiska wysokie z roślinnością torfotwórczą (żywe) (7110), torfowiska przejściowe i trzęsawiska (7140), torfowiska nakredowe (7210), górskie i nizinne torfowiska zasadowe o charakterze młak, turzycowisk i mechowisk (7230), oraz bory i lasy bagienne (91D0). Na podstawie dotychczas opublikowanych wyników badań i obserwacji terenowych, trudno jednoznacznie stwierdzić na ile zmiany tych siedlisk szczególnej troski są całkowicie odwracalne. 


IDimpactDescription: 47_0
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: PT-2015-2018
country: PT
envelope_link: https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pt/eu/ias/envyz_mka
description:
The effect on the honey bee population is a direct effect due the losses produced by direct predation by Vespa velutina, and indirectly by the reduction in the activities of bees in the presence of Vespa velutina, which results in a weakening and eventually the final death of the hive.
But it is also an impact on pollination by the honey bee


IDimpactDescription: 47_1
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: PT-2015-2018
country: PT
envelope_link: https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pt/eu/ias/envyz_mka
description:
Asian hornet is a predator of insects which may eventually lead in the medium term to significant impacts on biodiversity, particularly on native wasp species and populations of other insects. As side effects of the decrease in native entomofauna, there may be less pollination of species of natural or cultivated vegetation.


# eu_impactedProtectedHabitats

IDimpactedProtectedHabitats: 0
IDimpactDescription: 16_0
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
habitatCode: 91
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
name:
Alluvial forests with Alnus glutinosa and Fraxinus excelsior (Alno-Padion, Alnion incanae, Salicion albae)


IDimpactedProtectedHabitats: 0
IDimpactDescription: 13_2
IDreport: LV-2015-2018
country: LV
habitatCode: 3260
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lv/eu/ias/envxhoog
name:
Water courses of plain to montane levels with the Ranunculion fluitantis and Callitricho-Batrachion vegetation


# eu_impacts

IDimpacts: 0
IDmeasures: 11_1_management
IDreport: EE-2015-2018
country: EE
impactPerSpecies: -
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ee/eu/ias/envxlxidq
impactedNonTargetedSpecies:
Chemical control can effect any native species present in the colony, depending on how control has been carried out. No specific data has been collected species by species.


IDimpacts: 0
IDmeasures: 37_0_eradication
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
impactedNonTargetedSpecies: Amphibians
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
impactPerSpecies:
The amphibians in the treated area were captured and translocated to a nearby area avoiding the impact on them.


IDimpacts: 0
IDmeasures: 1_0_management
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
impactedNonTargetedSpecies: Ruderal vegetation and freshwater fauna
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
impactPerSpecies:
The use of phytosanitaries could affect other neighboring herbaceous species. However, since this species forms a monospecific community and the surrounding vegetation in the area is composed of common species, the impact is suitable. In order to minimize the impact in the freshwater fauna, the use of phytosanitaries is avoided when there is water in ditches or in the proximity of flooded fields. 


IDimpacts: 0
IDmeasures: 40_0_management
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
impactedNonTargetedSpecies: Macrobenthic invertebrates
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
impactPerSpecies:
Evidence of impact on the community of benthic aquatic macroinvertebrates (not significant, statistically) Decreased IBMWP (Iberian Biomonitoring Working Party), IASPT (IBMWP/number of taxa) and EPT (Ephemeroptera + Diptera + Trichoptera). Diptera family richness increased and Ephemeroptera family richness decreased. 


IDimpacts: 0
IDmeasures: 47_1_eradication
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
impactedNonTargetedSpecies: Species of the Apidae and Vespidae families
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
impactPerSpecies:
Non-target species unintended death. Although the traps are selective, some non-target species fall into them, although with very low impact, because a few number of traps have been set, in addition they are very selective.


IDimpacts: 0
IDmeasures: 47_0_management
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
impactedNonTargetedSpecies: Insects
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
impactPerSpecies:
By trapping the queens, specimens of other species are also caught (it is worth mentioning Vespa cabro). 


IDimpacts: 0
IDmeasures: 47_2_management
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
impactedNonTargetedSpecies: Flying insects
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
impactPerSpecies:
Accidental capture with attractant baited traps. As consequence of the number of actions carried out, the impact on non-target species is not considered significant.


IDimpacts: 0
IDmeasures: 47_3_management
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
impactedNonTargetedSpecies: Vespa cabro
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
impactPerSpecies:
Vespa cabro (European hornet) is vulnerable since its behavior is similar to that of the Asian species. 


# eu_measures

IDmeasures: 32_0_management
IDspecies: 32
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018-03-18
endDate: 2018-11-30
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Fishing rules and regulations allow the capture of specimens of this species. Once any of these specimens are taken into possession, they must be killed immediately.


IDmeasures: 32_2_management
IDspecies: 32
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2016-10-25
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Currently in development. A control plan for the species has been drawn up in Extremadura (http://doe.gobex.es/pdfs/doe/2016/2200o/16061720.pdf). This plan has been developed according to Spanish regulation (article 64.5 of Ley 42/2007, de 13 de diciembre, del Patrimonio Natural y de la Biodiversidad) and Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014.
A Natura 2000 Network site where, at least partly, the measures have been carried out is the ZEC "Ríos Algón y Jerte" (ES4320071)


IDmeasures: 32_4_management
IDspecies: 32
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #5
startDate: 2018-09-05
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Currently in development. Control by sport fishing (using crab traps) in authorized water bodies in accordance with the law (https://www.xunta.gal/dog/Publicados/2018/20180913/AnuncioG0422-100918-0001_es.html)
Related to the Natura 2000 Network sites, the species has only been mentioned in the Serra de Enciña de Lastra ZEC (ES1130009), where sport fishing is permitted as a management measure. 


IDmeasures: 34_0_management
IDspecies: 34
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Pennisetum setaceum is widely spread throughout the Valencian Community coastal and pre-coastal territories. This species has colonized the territory as a result of its extensive use in xero-gardening. Management measures have been carried out since 2010, assuming that their eradication is impossible (as the result of the pressure of propagules on the environment and the inaccessibility of many of the populations). The measures have not stopped the spread of the species in the Valencian territory which is favored by the development in transport infrastructure. The measures made yearly is shown as well as the number of localities where these measures have been applied. 
     - year 2010; working days: 52; number of localities: 26;
     - year 2011; working days: 48; number of localities: 20; 
     - year 2012; working days: 36; number of localities: 17;
     - year 2013; working days: 74; number of localities: 41;
     - year 2014; working days: 94; number of localities: 33;
     - year 2015; working days: 84; number of localities: 28;
     - year 2016; working days: 35; number of localities: 21;
     - year 2017; working days: 32; number of localities: 24;
     - year 2018; working days: 10; number of localities: 9 	


IDmeasures: 34_2_management
IDspecies: 34
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
In the municipality of San José. Subject to rapid eradication after early detection. The measures last 2 years.


IDmeasures: 37_0_eradication
IDspecies: 37
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: unclear
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-06-01
endDate: 2016-10-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Eradication of a local population of American crab in a locality about 50m2 in Venta del Moro (Natura 2000 network LIC and natural park "Hoces del Cabriel" (ES5233010). A combination of hand (capture with hand nets) and physical (desiccation) methods were used.
The measure began in June 2016 by hand removal of 300 specimens. On July 3, the water body was drained due to the difficulty to remove all the specimens. The draining was quick and, at the same time, 1.500 specimens were removed. Later, on July 5-11, more specimens, which were buried in mud, were removed. In total, 1.998 crab specimens were removed. The eradication was possible thanks to the complete draining of the water body which was kept empty from July to October 2016.


IDmeasures: 37_0_management
IDspecies: 37
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-08-03
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Capture by eel and crab nets. Currently in development. Andalusia has implemented a control plan for the species in the Guadalquivir wetlands (https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/boja/2016/152/8). This plan has been developed according to Spanish regulation (article 64.5 of Ley 42/2007, de 13 de diciembre, del Patrimonio Natural y de la Biodiversidad) and Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 The unlimited commercialization of the species intended for the food industry is included in this plan. Between August 2016 - December 2017, 2.926 tonnes were caught in the Guadalquivir wetlands (about 117 million specimens).


IDmeasures: 24_0_management
IDspecies: 24
IDreport: FR-2015-2018
country: FR
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: avant 2015
endDate: opérations en cours
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fr/eu/ias/envxouw3q
addInfo:
Espèce classée nuisible : les animaux peuvent être toute l'année piégés en tout lieu, détruits à tir, déterrés, avec ou sans chien. (arrêté du 2 septembre 2016)


IDmeasures: 31_0_eradication
IDspecies: 31
IDreport: FR-2015-2018
country: FR
effectiveness: stable
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018
endDate: en cours
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fr/eu/ias/envxouw3q
addInfo:
Seuls les agents de l'ONCFS assistés des agents de l'AFB, de gestionnaires d'espaces naturels, de lieutenants de louveterie, de gardes-particuliers et pour cet ensemble après avoir eu une formation par l'ONCFS et restant sous leur contrôle, assurent la destruction des érismatures rousses. Spécifiquement sur le lac de Grand-Lieu en Loire-Atlantique, les agents de la réserve naturelle nationale sont autorisés à détruire les spécimens d'érismature rousse. Plus de 2000 oiseaux ont été prélevés depuis 1996 et  177 en 2018. un bilan annuel est réalisé par l'ONCFS dans le cadre du plan national de lutte dont le comité de pilotage se réunit annuellement. Les effectifs hivernaux en France en 2019 étaient de moins de 100 oiseaux (d'ordinaire le double) sans savoir quelles en sont les raisons. depuis octobre 2018, l'ONCFS assisté de la structure gestionnaire de la réserve naturelle du lac de Grand-lieu (SNPN) pilote un LIFE Nature pour 5 années avec le recrutement d'une équipe dédiée de 4 agents. Ils ont pour objectifs d'appuyer ce qui se fait déjà au sein de l'ONCFS en renforçant la capacité de détection et de réaction rapide. Parallèlement, la captivité de cette espèce fait l'objet d'un suivi prioritaire par l'ONCFS.
http://www.oncfs.gouv.fr/Recherches-sur-les-especes-exotiques-envahissantes-ru509/Strategie-dans-l-eradication-de-l-erismature-rousse-ar1271 


IDmeasures: 47_0_management
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: FR-2015-2018
country: FR
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #1
startDate: depuis 2008
endDate: en cours
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fr/eu/ias/envxouw3q
addInfo:
Destruction des nids de frelon par méthodes physiques et chimiques, sans résultats effectifs. Espèce ayant colonisé l'ensemble du territoire métropolitain.


IDmeasures: 24_0_management
IDspecies: 24
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2015-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfo:
NFC Zvolen: Hunting statistics for period of 2015-2018. Information on hunting bags - 1818 individuals.


IDmeasures: 24_1_management
IDspecies: 24
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2016-01-01
endDate: 2016-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfo:
NFC Zvolen: Hunting statistics for period of 2015-2018. Information on hunting bags - 2607 individuals.


IDmeasures: 24_2_management
IDspecies: 24
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2017-01-01
endDate: 2017-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfo:
NFC Zvolen: Hunting statistics for period of 2015-2018. Information on hunting bags - 2687 individuals.


IDmeasures: 24_3_management
IDspecies: 24
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #4
startDate: 2018-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfo:
NFC Zvolen: Hunting statistics for period of 2015-2018. Information on hunting bags - 2736 individuals.


IDmeasures: 28_0_management
IDspecies: 28
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-10-01
endDate: 2016-06-15
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfo:
NFC Zvolen: Hunting statistics for period of 2015-2018. Information on hunting bags - 7 individuals.


IDmeasures: 28_1_management
IDspecies: 28
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2016-10-01
endDate: 2017-06-15
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfo:
NFC Zvolen: Hunting statistics for period of 2015-2018. Information on hunting bags - 19 individuals.


IDmeasures: 28_2_management
IDspecies: 28
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2017-10-01
endDate: 2018-06-15
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfo:
NFC Zvolen: Hunting statistics for period of 2015-2018. Information on hunting bags - 40 individuals.


IDmeasures: 39_0_management
IDspecies: 39
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2015-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfo:
NFC Zvolen: Hunting statistics for period of 2015-2018. Information on hunting bags - 6 individuals.


IDmeasures: 39_1_management
IDspecies: 39
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2016-01-01
endDate: 2016-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfo:
NFC Zvolen: Hunting statistics for period of 2015-2018. Information on hunting bags - 2 individuals.


IDmeasures: 39_2_management
IDspecies: 39
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2017-01-01
endDate: 2017-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfo:
NFC Zvolen: Hunting statistics for period of 2015-2018. Information on hunting bags - 3 individuals.


IDmeasures: 0_0_management
IDspecies: 0
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-04-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Currently in development. Hand collection of chicks in the breeding areas in the city of Pontevedra (Galicia).
The species has been cited in the following Natura 2000 Network sites, but no measures have been carried out: ZECs "Ensenada de San Simón" (ES1140016), "A Ramallosa" (ES1140003), "Baixo Miño" (ES1140007) and "Baixa Limia" (ES1130001).


IDmeasures: 0_1_management
IDspecies: 0
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2016-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Completed by rural agents with firearms. Twelve specimens were controlled (9 in 2016, 2 in 2017, 1 in 2018). The rural agents have carried out surveys and confiscated specimens which have been moved to the Wildlife Center "Torrefusa". A management plan has been drawn up http://mediambient.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/ambits_dactuacio/patrimoni_natural/especies_exotiques_medinatural/llista_sp_catalogades/ocells/DOC/Oca-egipcia.-Alopochen-aegyptiaca.pdf


IDmeasures: 1_0_management
IDspecies: 1
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Currently in development. The General Directorate of Natural Heritage of the Department of Environment, Territory and Housing of the Government of Galicia has hired in the period 2016 - 2018 a service to apply management measures for invasive flora and fauna species in Galicia. One of the measures is focused on the adoption of early eradication measures for invasive alien species, where the early eradication of Altemanthera philoxeroides is included. The measures carried out are listed hereunder:
10/06/2015 - Glyphosate application
27/07/2015 -  Glyphosate application
02/10/2017 - 04/10/2017 Hand removal
09/10/2017 – Biocide application
29/11/2017 – Biocide application
03/10/ 2018 – Biocide application + mechanical treatment


IDmeasures: 3_0_management
IDspecies: 3
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: stable
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-05-06
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
On May 6, 2016, a written document was sent to the Directorate General for Coasts communicating the presence of the species in the coasts requesting collaboration for the species removal. The specimens still remain in the area.


IDmeasures: 3_1_management
IDspecies: 3
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Physical treatment and chemical application in all localities. In 2018, salinization was tested in the Parque Natural de Oyambre obtaining good results. Localities where the measures have taken place: Parque Natural de las Dunas de Liencres, Parque Natural de las Marismas de Santoña and Ría de Tijero.


IDmeasures: 39_0_eradication
IDspecies: 39
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: decreasing
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
High efficiency. It’s necessary the coordination with the Basque Country authorities considering this region as the entry pathway. 


IDmeasures: 3_2_management
IDspecies: 3
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
In Gipuzkoa, the measures have taken place in the municipalities of Irun, Hondarribia, Pasaia, Errenteria, Lezo, Donostia-San Sebastian, Usurbil,Orio, Zarautz and Aia. Natura 2000 Network sites where, at least partly, the measures have been carried out are listed: ZECs "Txingudi-Bidasoa", "Jaizkibel", "Ulia", "Iñurritza" and "Ría del Oria". Measures of control and eradication of Baccharis halimifolia in the framework of the project Txinbadia+ (Basque Government and Gipuzkoa Provincial Council).
- In Bizkaia the measures have taken place in the municipalities of Mendexa, Lekeitio, Lemoiz, Gatika, Plentzia, Gorliz and Muskiz. Natura 2000 Network sites where, at least partly, the measures have been carried out are listed: ZECs "Río Lea","Barbadun" and "Estuario del Butrón". Mechanical and chemical control of the specimens located in 2016 (Basque Government) and in 2017 (Bizkaia Provincial Council). 
In ZEC "Barbadun": mechanical removal of all the specimens detected during 2015.  In 2017 and 2018 an inspection was carried out and no new specimens or regrowth were found. Up to this day, monitoring is maintained and there is no evidence of specimens. In Butron Estuary: mechanical and chemical control of specimens. Intense sprouts and new plants located after the treatments of 2016 and 2017. Annual monitoring.                         


IDmeasures: 7_0_management
IDspecies: 7
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Removal measures were carried out throughout the years. Mechanical extraction and physical control measures by floating barriers. Natura 2000 Network sites where, at least partly, the measures have been carried out are listed here: ZEC “Río Guadiana Internacional” (ES4310027), ZEC “Río Guadiana Alto-Zújar” (ES4310026), ZEPA “Embalse de Montijo” (ES0000328) and ZEPA “Azud de Badajoz” (ES0000393).


IDmeasures: 7_1_management
IDspecies: 7
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2009-09-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Hand removal hardly affects native macrophytes since Eichhornia crassipes grows forming practically a monospecific community. The populations of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) detected by the early warning network are being removed from the environment. Natura 2000 Network sites where, at least partly, the measures have been carried out are listed here: "Complexo Ons - O Grove (Lagoa Bodeira)" (ES1140004) and "Betanzos-Mandeo" (ES1110007).


IDmeasures: 24_0_management
IDspecies: 24
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
In Catalonia, the species is controlled mainly by the Rural Agents Corps. 104 specimens were captured during the activity period of this report: 14 (2015), 29 (2016), 38 (2017) and 23 (2018).
														


IDmeasures: 32_5_management
IDspecies: 32
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #6
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Captures by crab traps in the Barrendiola-Brinkola reservoir (for water supply) (Urola river basin, Municipality of Legazpia).


IDmeasures: 32_7_management
IDspecies: 32
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #8
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-01-12
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
The measures taking place in the Llobregat river basin (province of Barcelona) are currently in development. The population is decreasing and the size of specimens which prey on naiads is decreasing as well. The population of naiads is increasing and the impact on the native crayfish is positive. Measures developed mainly by the ADEFFA Association of Santa Maria de Merlès, Barcelona.


IDmeasures: 15_0_eradication
IDspecies: 15
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Currently in development. The mechanical-physical methods applied are backhoe and hand removal. The prohibition of the use of herbicides in aquatic environment supposes an important limitation for the control of these species. As a result of these works, it is concluded that the control of this species with mechanical methods is impossible. A summary which allows assessing the scope of these works is presented: 
Locality: Altea
    - year  2011;  working days: 58;  extracted volume: 400m3; area: 2.288 m2 
    - year 2012;  working days: 18;  extracted volume: 48,4m3; area: 3.892 m2
    - year 2013;  working days: 5;  extracted volume: 14 m3; area: 4.200 m2
    - year 2014;  working days: 4;  extracted volume: 5 m3; area: without data
    - year 2015;  working days: without data;  extracted volume: 0m3; area: 830 m2
    - year 2016;  working days: without data;  extracted volume: 0m3; area: 470 m2
    - year 2017; working days: without data; extracted volume: 0 m3; area: 210 m2
Locality: El Campello
    - year 2017; working days:9; extracted volume 38m3; area: 1.846 m2
It is important to remark that the population decrease in Altea isn’t a result of these measures but the adverse climatic conditions for the species. On the other hand, an increase in the distribution area in the Valencian Community has been verified, passing from one to two populations.


IDmeasures: 18_0_eradication
IDspecies: 18
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: unclear
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018-06-15
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Currently in development. The eradication requires the combination of methods: monitoring and intensive capture of adults and larvae, physical isolation and salinization to eliminate the aquatic stage. More information in http://mediambient.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/ambits_dactuacio/patrimoni_natural/especies_exotiques_medinatural/gestio_fauna_invasora/granota_toro/INFORME-GRANOTA-TORO.pdf
14 specimens have been analyzed to discard the presence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans and Ranavirus with a negative result. More information in http://mediambient.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/ambits_dactuacio/patrimoni_natural/especies_exotiques_medinatural/gestio_fauna_invasora/granota_toro/Informe-sanitari-Rana-Toro.pdf


IDmeasures: 19_0_eradication
IDspecies: 19
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
LIC "Albufera" (ES0000023); year 2014; treated area:12 m2; eradicated area: 12 m2; working days: 2. Hand removal. 
LIC "Marjal de la Safor" (ES5233030) (Ullal Fosc); year 2917; eradicated volume: 3,5 m3; working days: 5,5. Hand removal.


IDmeasures: 32_8_management
IDspecies: 32
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #9
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2017-12-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
The measures took place in the Riera de Canet and Llèmena river (province of Girona). These measures were included in the LIFE Potamofauna program. The population decreased up to 90% in the control localities.


IDmeasures: 34_0_eradication
IDspecies: 34
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2017-01-01
endDate: 2017-01-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
The measure was carried out in the municipality of Alhama de Murcia in 2017 and it lasts one day. It was done at the request of an environmental association. It consisted of the eradication of specimens planted in a roundabout since 2008. Technicians verified a very good result of that action, however, in the vicinity of the roundabout, a total of 38 "escaped" individuals appeared.


IDmeasures: 19_0_management
IDspecies: 19
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: stable
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-12
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Ludwigia grandiflora inhabits a large area in coastal marshes and in the middle and lower courses of the Júcar River. It is only possible to control its development and try to eradicate small, incipient or confined populations. A combination of manual and mechanical methods has been used in control and eradication works.
- LIC and Natural Park "Albufera de Valencia" (ES0000023)
     - year 2016; treated area: 6.990 m2; eradicated area: 6.990 m2; working days: 8+16 of machinery; methods: mechanical and manual works. Result: need to be checked. 
     - year 2017; treated area: 1.545 m2 (sprouts); eradicated area: 1.545 m2; working days: 44+12 of machinery; mechanical and manual works. Result: need to be checked.
     - year 2018; treated area: 110 m2 (sprouts); eradicated area: 110 m2; working days: 7 (Natural Park brigade) PN. manual works. Result: need to be checked.
- LIC and Natural Park "Marjal de Pego-Oliva" (ES0000147)
     - year 2016: treated area: 5.814 lineal meter; eradicated area: 2.700 lineal meter; working days: 4+10 of machinery; methods: mechanical and manual works. Result: Negative results, regeneration of the population in a vegetative period. 
-LIC " Xeraco, Xeresa, Gandía, Tavernes de la Valldigna " (ES5233030). In an irrigation ditch of the Marjal de Xeresa where Utricularia australis (cataloged as critically endangered) inhabits, in order to reduce competition.
     - year 2016; eradicated surface: 300 m2; working days: 31;  methods: manual works. Result: need to be checked. 
     - year 2017; eradicated area; 300 m2, working days: 7; methods: manual works. Result: need to be checked .
     - year 2018; extracted volume: 4,6 m3; working days: 20; methods: manual works.  Result: need to be checked.
- Specific measures in the Albaida river (municipalities of Bellús and Xàtiva); year 2017; working days: 14.
- Specific measures in the Algar river (municipalities of Bellús and Xàtiva); year 2013; volume extracted: 11,4 m3; working days: 3,1.


IDmeasures: 19_1_management
IDspecies: 19
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2015-12-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
The main actions carried out in Galicia to control the species are as follows.
- 15/10/2014 - 16/10/2014. Removal of the species was carried out by the Delegation of Ourense, General Directorate of Nature Conservation. A mechanized removal was carried out with a backhoe in 80 meters of the channel (riverbed), from upstream to downstream. The removed biomass was deposited in a nearby ditch until it rotted.
-19/9/2015 and 29/09/2016. Working days for the elimination of Ludwigia grandiflora on the Limia river by volunteers led by ADEGA technical staff. http://www.adega.gal/novas.php?id=380&idioma=gl&sec=9
- 20/10/2016 - 04/11/2016. Elimination works in the Barbaña and Barbañica rivers in Ourense by the Miño-Sil Hydrographic Confederation.
- 11-30/08/2017. Carried out by the brigade of the Territorial Headquarters of the Department of the Environment and Land Planning in Ourense. The removed plants were destroyed by burying them into a plot assigned by the Galician Society of Natural History in the area of action.
- 16/9/2017. Working day for the elimination of Ludwigia grandiflora by volunteers led by ADEGA technical staff. http://www.adega.gal/novas.php?id=380&idioma=gl&sec=9
- 20-27/10/2017. Hand removal in the Barbaña river by the Miño-Sil Hydrographic Confederation.
A Natura 2000 Network site where, at least partly, the measures have been carried out is the ZEC "Baixa Limia-Serra do Xurés"	(ES1130001)


IDmeasures: 25_0_eradication
IDspecies: 25
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: decreasing
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
The mechanical-physical methods used to control M. aquaticum consist of a combination of hand removal and use of covers made of biodegradable jute, to crush the plants and deprive them of light. The works aren't successful. A summary of indicators that allow assessing the results of the measures is presented:
     - year 2012; treated area: 395 m2; covered area: 0 m2; removed biomass by hand: 0 m2; working days: 0, 
     - year 2013; treated area: 395 m2; covered area: 395m2; removed biomass by hand: 2,5m3; working days: 38,9 .
     - year 2014; treated area: 384 m2; covered area: 372m2; removed biomass by hand: 9,5m3; working days: 40.
     - year 2015; treated area: 281 m2; covered area: 0; removed biomass by hand: 18,3 m3; working days: 34.
     - year 2016; treated area: 460 m2; covered area: 0; removed biomass by hand: 43,5m3; working days: 83,4 .
     - year 2017; treated area: 42 m2; covered area: 0; removed biomass by hand: 2,3m3; working days: 25.
     - year 2018; treated area: 42 m2; covered area: 0; removed biomass by hand: 2,2m3; working days: 27.
A Natura 2000 Network site where, at least partly, the measures have been carried out is the LIC "Curs Mitja del Riu Albaida" (ES5232008)


IDmeasures: 25_1_eradication
IDspecies: 25
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2017-05-18
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Currently in development. Eradication measure by the Barcelona Provincial Council in the only known locality of the species in El Molinot reservoir, (Parc del Montnegre y el Corredor).


IDmeasures: 25_0_management
IDspecies: 25
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2017-09-12
endDate: 2017-09-27
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Emptying the pond where the specimens inhabited, capture and translocation. 
A Natura 2000 Network site where, at least partly, the measures have been carried out is the ZEC "Monfragüe" (ES4320077)


IDmeasures: 29_0_management
IDspecies: 29
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: containment
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
This measure tries to avoid the contact in the headwaters between the populations of this species and those of the native crayfish. The species has already colonized the Boadella reservoir. Measures carried out in part by the Salines Bassegoda Consortium.


IDmeasures: 37_3_management
IDspecies: 37
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #4
startDate: 2016-10-25
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Currently in development. A control plan for the species has been drawn up in Extremadura (http://doe.gobex.es/pdfs/doe/2016/2200o/16061720.pdf). This plan has been developed according to Spanish regulation (article 64.5 of Ley 42/2007, de 13 de diciembre, del Patrimonio Natural y de la Biodiversidad) and Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014.


IDmeasures: 37_5_management
IDspecies: 37
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #6
startDate: 2015-04-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Currently in development. Control by sport fishing (using crab traps) in authorized water bodies in accordance with the law (https://www.xunta.gal/dog/Publicados/2018/20180913/AnuncioG0422-100918-0001_es.html). This measure implies to kill immediately the specimens of Procambarus clarkii captured, for which reason no inspection was made to the establishment. The security measures in the transport (confinement of specimens, contingency plan) of the specimens were appropriated. 
Related to the Natura 2000 Network sites, the species has only been mentioned in ZEC "Serra de Enciña de Lastra" (ES1130009), where sport fishing is permitted as a management measures.


IDmeasures: 37_7_management
IDspecies: 37
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: stable
objective: containment
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #8
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Fishing is prohibited.
Mainly physical methods have been carried out (capture). In one locality of Teruel, treatments with antiquitinizers have been applied. 


IDmeasures: 37_8_management
IDspecies: 37
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #9
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
In Moxina, estanys d’en Broc (Girona). Spring and summer traps. Measures carried out by the Volcanic Zone of La Garrotxa - Molino del Font Wildlife Center (DTES).


IDmeasures: 31_0_management
IDspecies: 31
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: stable
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2011-01-01
endDate: 2030-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
The species has been subject to control efforts well before its entry into force. Since 2011, a response protocol is operational to (try to) cull every observed specimen (shooting). From its entry into force (3/8/'16) to date, 22 birds have been culled in this manner. The population is maintained at (very) low levels.


IDmeasures: 39_0_management
IDspecies: 39
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-At sites where protected species are present that are potentially impacted by the raccoon (freshwater bivalves, amphibians, reptiles, ground nesting birds), life traps are placed (life traps, so no impact on other species). There are insufficient measures on the terrain to slow down the progression of the species. 
-As there are only very casual observations of the species in the Atlantic bioregion, all available means go to population control in the Continental bioregion.


IDmeasures: 39_1_management
IDspecies: 39
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: increasing
objective: containment
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
Government-led attempts to capture raccoons have been undertaken since its entry into force, but these have been met with limited success so far. Given the current populations in south and east of Flanders, it will be very difficult to avert the species from gaining further foothold.
Management ongoing: no specified end date


IDmeasures: 45_0_management
IDspecies: 45
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: eradicated
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2030-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
A government-led response protocol is operational to (try to) cull every observed specimen. From its entry into force (3/8/'16) to date, 2 birds have been culled in this manner. Sightings of the species are very rare, and probably represent newly escaped specimens.


IDmeasures: 46_0_management
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
- No end date is specified
- Test at pilote sites: 50 individuals were captured with live traps and then killed with a bolt gun in 2016, 4 in 2017 and 59 in 2018. 
- Priority sites need to be identified


IDmeasures: 46_2_management
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
- No enddate specified
- Since its entry into force, initiatives on legislation and communication have been taken with the aim of intensifying its control. Measures are taken mostly by local authorities and practitioners. These concern feral populations that become re-stocked by illegal dumping of pet turtles, with no signs of natural reproduction so far. 


IDmeasures: 47_0_eradication
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: decreasing
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-11-18
endDate: 2017-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
- Potential impact of the insecticide on non-target insect species. However, this impact is undocumented and considered as low since the insecticide was used at the end of the season. 
- Detection and neutralisation of a nest 2016 december. Late (and thus partial) destruction.  
- In 2017, neutralisation of 4 nests after an attack on beehives of which 3 were in the proximity of the nests of 2016. 


IDmeasures: 16_2_management
IDspecies: 16
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Owentaraglin Catchment
startDate: 2015-02-28
endDate: 2021-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfo:
Eradication measures apply to the Owentaraglin Catchment, from source, downstream as far as confluence with Blackwater.
End date for eradication measures are undetermined.
Eradication measures are by hand-pulling of the plants.
Funding of this work is from a RAPTORLIFE project covering both the Blackwater catchment and the Owentaraglin catchment with total cost for Impatiens glandulifera control to date being €338,048. As the level of infestation and input into control is approximately equal for both catchements, a cost of €169,024 cost of eradication including personnel, travel & subsistence and consumables to date is given for this site.
Further information on the RAPTORLIFE project is available from: https://www.duhallowlife.com/raptor-life/about-raptor-life-project


IDmeasures: 13_10_management
IDspecies: 13
IDreport: LV-2015-2018
country: LV
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #11 Ķekavas luterāņu baznīca
startDate: 2006-04-25
endDate: 2024-10-10
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lv/eu/ias/envxhoog
addInfo:
Eradication methods used: other- combined 
Duration of application of eradication - until complete eradication


IDmeasures: 17_0_eradication
IDspecies: 17
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
effectiveness: decreasing
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Lough Inchiquin
startDate: 2016-09-28
endDate: 2020-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfo:
Control methods include hand pulling of Lagarosiphon major by divers for small areas of infestation. The removed plant material is bagged and disposed of. Laying of jute matting (which is biodegradable) will cover beds of Lagarosiphon major where the infestation is more extensive. 
The site will be monitored for re-growth from the shore line and through diving and infestations found will be treated according to the above methods as appropriate.
Indirect methods: Biosecurity actions have been put in place to  prevent further spread within and from the site.  This includes implementation of biosecurity guidelines such as check, clean and disinfection of all equipment and outerwear while undertaking eradication works and for users of the lake. Erection of biosecurity guidance signs around the lake and direct engagement with fishing rights owners, local anglers, local residents and other relevant stakeholder groups.
Initial control measures in 2016-2017 substantially reduced the population of Lagarosiphon major. However, no control measures were undertaken in 2018 and site surveys in May 2019 show that there has been some spread within Lough Inchiquin and also to the lower connected Lough Clonee. An up-dated eradication plan is currently being drafted. 
No impacts on non-target species have been reported to date.
The end date for eradication measures is currently undetermined. 


IDmeasures: 17_0_management
IDspecies: 17
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Lough Corrib
startDate: 2008-01-01
endDate: 2025-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfo:
Control work in 2008-2013 under the CAISIE LIFE programme reduced the total surface area of the species in Lough Corrib from 98 hectares to 9 hectares where population management is ongoing.
Mechanised operations (cutting and harvesting) were carried out on 98 hectares. The harvested plants were dried and composted on site. Manual
uprooting was done in very small areas (a total of 0.5 hectare) and made it possible to selectively manage L. major in sections where its density was low.Regrowth of native macrophytes occurred, but at slower rates than on the sites where sheets of burlap were used. The latter method was implemented on a total of 5 hectares and had a number of advantages:
- ease of use (the biodegradable fabric rapidly absorbs water and sinks to the bottom, it is not necessary to remove it);
- the curly waterweed covered by the fabric quickly dies;
- native macrophytes regrow through the burlap fabric after approximately 4 months and the original plant community fully recovers after about 2 years.
Cost of managing Lagarosiphon major in Lough Corrib was 400 000 euros from 2005 to 2008;  1.5 million euros from 2009 to 2012 and 300 000 euros in 2013 - i.e. a total of 2.2 million euros for the period from 2005 to 2013.
At the time of reporting there was no updated data available on the extent and cost of the ongoing managment measures. 
The end date is currently undetermined. 


IDmeasures: 23_0_eradication
IDspecies: 23
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Stranorlar, Co. Donegal
startDate: 2017-02-23
endDate: 2017-02-24
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfo:
One male Muntjac deer was caught using a net, removed from site and then shot with a rifle. No additional Muntjac deer were seen during further surveillance of the area.


IDmeasures: 23_1_eradication
IDspecies: 23
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
effectiveness: unclear
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: The North Slob, Co. Wexford
startDate: 2017-01-19
endDate: 2018-03-30
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfo:
On the day the Muntiacus reevesi was seen and reported, eradication by shooting was attempted but measures could not be deployed as a clear shot was not possible. Subsequently two cameras over about two months. The camera trap sites were baited with carrots, potatoes and turnip but no Muntiacus reevesi were observed or subsequently reported. Local National Parks and Wildlife Service Conservation Ranger raised awarenss of the sighting with the local community and the large bird watching community that visit the site and encouraged reporting of the species.  


IDmeasures: 24_0_management
IDspecies: 24
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Curaheen, Cork
startDate: 2016-10-03
endDate: 2020-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfo:
Most of the animals trapped and removed from this core population site occued during the initial rapid response phase. Few animals have been seen. At this stage it is unclear what the extent of the populaiton is and so it is also unclear what the popualtion trend is at this time. 
An estimated end date of 31 December 2020 is given for managment measures at this core population site but in reality, the end date will be determined by the effectivenness of the management measures that are being periodically assessed and so there is currently an undetermined end date.


IDmeasures: 39_0_eradication
IDspecies: 39
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Gaggan, Bandon, Cork
startDate: 2017-07-17
endDate: 2017-07-17
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfo:
On the day the sighting was reported, National Parks and Wildlife Service rapidly responded by commissioning a pest control service to collect and euthanize the animals. The two animals were dispatched by shooting using .22 rifle on same day as sighting reported. No further animals seen. 
Both specimens deposited with University College Cork for further examination. 
Species alert and eradication measures submitted to NOTSYS on 01 August 2018.


IDmeasures: 39_1_eradication
IDspecies: 39
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Ballyheean, Liscannor, Co. Clare
startDate: 2018-10-10
endDate: 2018-10-10
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfo:
One female approximately 1 year old was captured by National Parks and Wildlife Service and taken into captivity by Fota Wildlife park in Co. Cork.


IDmeasures: 39_2_eradication
IDspecies: 39
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Macroon, Co. Cork
startDate: 2018-11-13
endDate: 2018-11-13
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfo:
One animal was dispatched in November 2018. Prior to this date there were numerous anecdotal and one verified report of a Procyon lotor in the general vicinity. Local National Parks and Wildlife Service Conservation Ranger was responding to the sightings and an animal detected and dispatched. There have been no further sighting reports for this area. There were however anecdotal reports of Raccoon in locations approximately 10 kilometres away in November 2018. National Parks and Wildlife Service staff remain vigilant in surveillance for the animal(s) but none have been detected and none there have been no further reported sightings from these areas. 


IDmeasures: 28_0_management
IDspecies: 28
IDreport: SE-2015-2018
country: SE
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Höga kusten
startDate: 2018-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/se/eu/ias/envxkngww
addInfo:
250 muskrats killed, ca 50% of affected waterways now free of muskrats. Eradication programme continues.


IDmeasures: 32_0_management
IDspecies: 32
IDreport: SE-2015-2018
country: SE
effectiveness: eradicated
objective: containment
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Gute
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/se/eu/ias/envxkngww
addInfo:
https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/se/eu/ias/envxkngww/AtgArder_2015-2019_signalkrAfta_Pacifastacus_leniusculus.docx


IDmeasures: 31_0_eradication
IDspecies: 31
IDreport: DK-2015-2018
country: DK
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1 Horsens Fjord
startDate: 2018-12-01
endDate: 2019-06-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/dk/eu/ias/envxl8tna
addInfo:
An individual was registered and photo documented. The bird had however left the area when the Nature Agency went to eradicate it. A few weeks later an individual was shot just on the other side of the border in Germany, which could have been this individual. It has not been resighted in Denmark. 


IDmeasures: 0_0_management
IDspecies: 0
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
Designation of wildlife management units to shoot animals. In some provinces the population seems to stabilize.


IDmeasures: 4_0_management
IDspecies: 4
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
Mechanical removal of plants. These are local measures by water boards and sometimes by nature managers like the State Forestry Service. The costs of all measures for (all) water plants in the Netherlands by water boards are roughly estimated at 4 million euro annually. These measures take place in the context of the regular management of watercourses. 


IDmeasures: 9_0_management
IDspecies: 9
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
A general exemption for fishing invasive mittenkrab is regulated under the Nature protection Act. Fishing with commercial fishing gears (i.e. fykes) is exclusively for commercial fishermen (based on the Fisheries Law 1963). Next to a public license, a private permission from the owner of the water area or fishing rights is required, for example regional water management authorities. 


IDmeasures: 11_0_management
IDspecies: 11
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
Local measures by municipalities, water boards or nature managers. A project has been subsidized in Gelderland to involve citizens in the local removal of plants. In Flevoland the province contributes financially in a project by nature managers.


IDmeasures: 15_0_management
IDspecies: 15
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
Mechanical or manual removal of plants. These are local measures by water boards and sometimes by naturemanagers like the State Forestry Service. The costs of all measures for (all) water plants in the Netherlands by water boards are roughly estimated at 4 million euro annually. The scale of other organizations taking additional measures is unknown. 


IDmeasures: 16_0_management
IDspecies: 16
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
Local measures by municipalities, water boards or nature managers. A project has been subsidized in Gelderland to involve citizens in the local removal of plants.


IDmeasures: 37_12_management
IDspecies: 37
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #13
startDate: 2015-03-01
endDate: 2018-08-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Algars river (Ebro basin) (municipality of Arnes). Measures carried out by the Natural Park dels Ports, DTES.


IDmeasures: 37_13_management
IDspecies: 37
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #14
startDate: 2015-01-14
endDate: 2018-06-26
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Glorieta river (municipality of Alcover). The population of native crayfish and amphibians are declining. No effect on Procambarus clarkii population has been noticed. 


IDmeasures: 37_14_management
IDspecies: 37
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #15
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2015-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Monsant river. Native crayfish mortalities due to the crayfish plague. Measures carried out by the Natural Park Monsant.


IDmeasures: 37_15_management
IDspecies: 37
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #16
startDate: 2015-03-01
endDate: 2018-08-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Measures carried out in the dels Senglars pond, Parc del Montnegre i el Corredor by the Barcelona Provincial Council.  


IDmeasures: 37_16_management
IDspecies: 37
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #17
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Riera de Merlès. Llobregat basin. The red crab preys on naiads and it can transmit the crayfish plague. Measures carried out mainly by the ADEFFA Association of Santa Maria de Merlès, Barcelona.


IDmeasures: 37_17_management
IDspecies: 37
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #18
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2017-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Riera de Canet and Llèmena river. The population decreased up to 90% in the localities where the measures have been applied. Measures carried out in Estany de Banyoles and in the Natural Park of the Volcanic Zone of La Garrotxa.


IDmeasures: 39_1_eradication
IDspecies: 39
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2016-06-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Initially, The capture methods consisted of box traps and, later, of dog-proof traps. These capture methods were combined with photo-trapping techniques and bait station, to delimit the areas most frequented by the animals before the installation of the traps. The change of the trapping method led to a significant increase in the effectiveness of eradication actions. Trap boxes = 0,9 specimens/100 night-traps; dog proof traps = 5,2 specimens/100 night-traps. In total, 39 (16 males, 3 juveniles; 23 females, 4 juveniles), were captured during the action (37 months). The works required 235 working days distributed in three annualities: 2014 (88 working days); 2015 (98 working days); 2016 (49 working days). The measures have been developed in the framework of the Natura 2000 Network in the LIC "Aitana, Serrella and Puigcampana" (ES5213019).


IDmeasures: 39_0_management
IDspecies: 39
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
In Cádiz, subject to rapid eradication after early detection. In 2018, after some days of work, 1 specimen was captured with trap cages. 


IDmeasures: 39_1_management
IDspecies: 39
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2015-05-07
endDate: 2018-09-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
The method of capture is the box trap. Between the years 2015 and 2018, two male specimens were captured.


IDmeasures: 39_2_management
IDspecies: 39
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2017-07-31
endDate: 2018-05-15
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Service for the monitoring and early eradication of raccoon in areas of the Natura 2000 Network and areas of high nature value in the provinces of Lugo and A Coruña. Natura 2000 Network site where, at least partly, the measures have been carried out are listed here: ZECs “Parga-Ladra-Támoga” (ES1120003), “Fragas do Eume” (ES1110003), “Río Tambre” (ES1110016) and “Sistema Fluvial Ulla-Deza” (ES1140001).


IDmeasures: 39_3_management
IDspecies: 39
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #4
startDate: 2017-03-16
endDate: 2017-08-29
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Service for the monitoring and early eradication of raccoon in the Natural Park Baixa Limia and Serra do Xurés and in the area of influence ZEC “Baixa Limia - Serra do Xurés" (ES0000376).


IDmeasures: 40_0_management
IDspecies: 40
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: eradicated
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-09-01
endDate: 2016-10-30
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
A pilot project to eradicate the species has been carried out in El Peral stream, a tributary of the Alcollarín river. A product based on rotenone was applied ( 4 ppm of CFT Legumine 3.3% ® - 0,132 ppm of active rotenone). The population was eradicated in a section of the course but neither in the Alcollarín river nor in the Alcollarín reservoir.
Natura 2000 Network sites where, at least partly, the measure has been carried out are: ZEC "Río Guadiana Alto-Zújar" (ES4310026) and  ZEPA "Arrozales de Palazuelo y Guadalperales" (ES0000400).			


IDmeasures: 40_2_management
IDspecies: 40
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Park of the Area of Natural Interest of Gallecs. Control of the species in a specific locality within its distribution area. The specimens were removed from the water body where they were released previously by private owners. The species was eradicated in a specific locality within its distribution area. 


IDmeasures: 46_0_eradication
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: decreasing
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
All freshwater turtles found in the wild are removed. The CRFS (Centro de Recuperación de Fauna Silvestre, Wild Fauna Recovery Center ) informs the owners that they can not be released into the wild and the specimens delivered in this center are euthanized.


IDmeasures: 46_1_eradication
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: unclear
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
During 2015 and 2016, authorizations have been granted for the capture of the species included in volunteer activities which aim is the monitoring of the Segura River. Seven specimens were captured and delivered to the Wildlife Recovery Center.


IDmeasures: 46_2_eradication
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
- Valdeón, A.; A. Crespo-Diaz; A. Egaña-Callejo; A. Gosá (2010a) Update of the pond slider Trachemys scripta (Schoep, 1792) records in Navarre (Northern Spain), and presentation of the Aranzadi Turtle Trap for its population control. Aquatic invasions, 5(3): 297-302.
- Methodological protocol for control and management of Trachemys scripta Schoepff, 1792 and experimental application in LIC “Tramos Bajos del Aragón y del Arga”  (LIFE+ “Territorio Visón” - NAT/ES/00053).


IDmeasures: 46_0_management
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Trachemys scripta is widely distributed throughout the Valencian Community, it occupies all the humid coastal areas. Their populations are very abundant, so they compete with native freshwater turtle for resources. From 2003 to 2011, Trachemys scripts are captured outside the framework of a project.  For example, as a result of monitoring native freshwater turtles. However, in 2011 the LIFE TRACHEMYS get the project, developed by the Government of the Valencian Community. One of the aims of this project is to establish a strategy to eradicate the wild populations of invasive turtles. From this year, an important effort has been made and a high number of specimens have been captured as it appears in the following data. 
     - year 2010; working days: 283; number of captured specimens: 1.723; number of localities: 18
     - year 2011; working days: 1.684; number of captured specimens: 5.132; number of localities: 23
     - year 2012; working days: 1.572; number of captured specimens: 9.147; number of localities: 25
     - year 2013; working days: 1.556; number of captured specimens: 8.338; number of localities: 25
     - year 2014; working days: 714; number of captured specimens: 3.998; number of localities: 22
     - year 2015; working days: 285; number of captured specimens: 5.640; number of localities: 18
     - year 2016; working days: 320; number of captured specimens: 3.942; number of localities: 19
     - year 2017; working days: 255; number of captured specimens: 2.155; number of localities: 16


IDmeasures: 46_1_management
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Specimens captured are removed from the wild and specimens in captivity by private owners are recovered and toke in by the Government of La Rioja. 


IDmeasures: 46_2_management
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Removal campaigns have been carried out in the ZECs: "Monte e lagoa de Louro" (ES1110012) and Gándaras de Budiño (ES1140011).
Likewise, in compliance with the provisions of the Spanish regulations on the management of invasive alien species, and as a control measure of the entry into the wild of specimens of this species, the Wildlife Recovery Centers remove and take in those specimens found in the wild or turned in by private owners.
In 2018, the reproduction of the species in the wild (ZEC Gándaras de Budiño) was verified.


IDmeasures: 46_4_management
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #5
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-12
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
The actions are developed with turtle traps and floating turtle traps. At the moment they are not very effective.


IDmeasures: 46_5_management
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #6
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Llobregat river basin. It's necessary the control because this species displaces the native freshwater turtle Mauremys leprosa and the number of specimens of amphibians and native fish decreases where this species is present.


IDmeasures: 46_6_management
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #7
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Llobregat river basin. Besós river basin and urban parks. Barcelona. Unclear population trend. Actions in more than 35 control localities by Galanthus Association, by the Recovery Center for Amphibians and Reptiles of Catalonia and other organizations. In some localities, the population has been eradicated, in other localities are decreasing or the population trend is not clear.


IDmeasures: 46_7_management
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #8
startDate: 2016-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Riera de Merlés, Llobregat river basin and Aiguamolls de la Bòvila in Santpedor. Controls to support Mauremys leprosa.


IDmeasures: 47_0_eradication
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
There is a specific protocol for action in Catalonia. The methodology consists of specific traps and elimination of nests. The area of distribution of the species in Catalonia is increasing.  The influence of the control measures in the spread of the species is not determined.  


IDmeasures: 47_1_management
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Trapping of queens is subsidized by the municipalities. The active nests are removed and/or destroyed.


IDmeasures: 4_0_eradication
IDspecies: 4
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: unclear
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018-02-19
endDate: 2022-08-17
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
1. Sofortmaßnahme: Abwarten des Winters,
ob Bestände Frost überstehen;
2. Sofortmaßnahme: Kartierung und Planung
der Bekämpfung des einzigen dokumentierten
Vorkommens in Bayern


IDmeasures: 4_1_eradication
IDspecies: 4
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: unclear
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2018-11-01
endDate: 2021-10-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
Das Vorkommen wurde erst am 01.11.2018 gemeldet, daher wurden zwar bereits Maßnahmen im Berichtszeitraum ergriffen,
erstrecken sich aber v.a. in die zukünftigen Jahre.


IDmeasures: 47_3_management
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #4
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
In Galicia, the control strategy for this species is based on the provisions of the Monitoring and Control Protocol against the Asian Wasp (Vespa velutina) developed by the Department of Rural Areas of the Government of Galicia in coordination with the Department of Environment and Spatial Planning, Vice-presidency and Department of the Presidency, Public Administrations and Justice, Department of Health and FGAMP (Federación Galega de Municipios e Provincias, Galician Federation of Municipalities and Provinces).
The control actions taken are based on 3 fundamental measures:  Selective removal of queens in spring, early detection and nest removal and apiaries control. http://mediorural.xunta.gal/fileadmin/arquivos/gandaria/apicultura/Protocolo_vixilancia_e_control_vespa_velutina_Galicia_Rev_2016.pdf
http://mediorural.xunta.gal/fileadmin/arquivos/gandaria/apicultura/2018_protocolo_captura_rainas_vespa_velutina.pdf
Control actions have been carried out in the following areas of the Natura 2000 Network:
-	Illas Cíes “ES0000001”
-	Ortigueira-Mera “ES1110001”
-	Costa Ártabra “ES1110002”
-	Fragas do Eume “ES1110003”
-	Encoro de Abegondo – Cecebre “ES1110004”
-	Costa da Morte “ES1110005”
-	Complexo húmido de Corrubedo “ES1110006”
-	Betanzos – Mandeo “ES1110007”
-	Carnota - Monte Pindo “ES1110008”
-	Costa de Dexo “ES1110009”
-	Estaca de Bares “ES1110010”
-	Esteiro do Tambre “ES1110011”
-	Monte e lagoa de Louro “ES1110012”
-	Xubia – Castro “ES1110013”
-	Serra do Careón “ES1110014”
-	Río Anllóns “ES1110015”
-	Río Tambre “ES1110016”
-	Ancares – Courel “ES1120001”
-	Río Eo “ES1120002”
-	Parga - Ladra – Támoga “ES1120003”
-	A Marronda “ES1120004”
-	As Catedrais “ES1120005”
-	Carballido “ES1120006”
-	Cruzul – Agüeira “ES1120007”
-	Monte Faro “ES1120008”
-	Monte Maior “ES1120009”
-	Ría de Foz – Masma “ES1120011”
-	Río Landro “ES1120012”
-	Río Ouro “ES1120013
-	Canón do Sil “ES1120014”
-	Serra do Xistral “ES1120015”
-	Costa da Mariña occidental “ES1120017”
-	Baixa Limia “ES1130001”
-	Pena Veidosa “ES1130004”
-	Río Támega “ES1130005”
-	Sistema fluvial Ulla – Deza “ES1140001”
-	Río Lérez “ES1140002”
-	A Ramallosa “ES1140003”
-	Complexo Ons - O Grove “ES1140004”
-	Monte Aloia “ES1140005”
-	Río Tea “ES1140006”
-	Baixo Miño “ES1140007”
-	Cabo Udra “ES1140009”
-	Costa da Vela “ES1140010”
-	Gándaras de Budiño “ES1140011”
-	Illas Estelas “ES1140012”
-	Serra do Candán “ES1140013”
-	Serra do Cando “ES1140014”
-	Sobreirais do Arnego “ES1140015”
-	Enseada de San Simón “ES1140016”


IDmeasures: 47_4_management
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #5
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Activity Report: http://mediambient.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/ambits_dactuacio/patrimoni_natural/especies_exotiques_medinatural/llista_sp_catalogades/artropodes/doc_enll/Memoria-Vespa-velutina.pdf


IDmeasures: 47_5_management
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #6
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
In Bizkaia, control program with application of an action protocol, with the collaboration of the Natural Heritage Service of the Bizkaia Provincial Council, firefighters, the public company Basalan and municipalities of Bizkaia.


IDmeasures: 47_6_management
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #7
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfo:
Actions developed by the forest officers of the Government of Navarra when the species is detected. 


IDmeasures: 7_0_eradication
IDspecies: 7
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-11-03
endDate: 2017-07-06
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
Die Art ist während des Berichtszeitraums als Einzelfund aufgetreten. Sie wurde nicht aktiv durch Maßnahmen beseitigt, dennoch ist ihr Vorkommen mittlerweile offenbar erloschen. Als Grund hierfür werden Temperaturen außerhalb des physiologischen Toleranzbereichs während des Winters angenommen.


IDmeasures: 9_2_management
IDspecies: 9
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2018-09-25
endDate: 2024-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
MV	 Die Aufwand-Nutzen-Relation ist so ungünstig, dass der Beseitigung/Eindämmung der Art keine Priorität zugeordnet werden kann.
SH	Die Öffentlichkeit wurde über verschiedene Medien über die potentielle Gefährdung der heimischen Artenvielfalt durch die Wollhandkrabbe informiert. Die Wollhandkrabbe ist in Schleswig-Holstein bereits sehr weit verbreitet und breitet sich weitgehend ohne Hilfe des Menschen entlang der Fließgewässer aus. Da ein Zurückdrängen aus bereits besiedelten Gewässern kaum Aussicht auf Erfolg hat, liegt der Fokus bei dieser Art auf der Verhinderung der Besiedlung noch nicht besiedelter Gewässer und dem Schutz von Populationen des einheimischen Edelkrebses. Im Berichtszeitraum konnten keine Gebiete identifiziert werden, in denen eine Besiedlung sensibler Gebiete mit geeigneten Maßnahmen hätte verhindert werden können.
SN: Maßnahmen, die auf das Zurückdrängen aus bereits besiedelten Gewässern abzielen, sind nicht sehr erfolgversprechend.


IDmeasures: 17_0_management
IDspecies: 17
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018-09-01
endDate: 2021-08-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
Die Durchführung von Managementmaßnahmen in der kontinentalen Region wird noch hinsichtlich Kosten-Nutzen-Verhältnis geprüft


IDmeasures: 17_1_management
IDspecies: 17
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: containment
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2018-04-17
endDate: 2024-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
NI: Eine Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse und eine Priorisierung von Maßnahmen ist bisher noch nicht abschließend durchgeführt worden, daher wird mit einer Umsetzung von Maßnahmen ggf. zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt begonnen. 


IDmeasures: 21_10_management
IDspecies: 21
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #11
startDate: 2018-08-01
endDate: 2018-08-08
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
Die Individuen wurden durch Ausgraben entnommen. Die (mittel- bis langfristige) Wirksamkeit der Maßnahme kann erst im Folgejahr abgeschätzt werden. 


IDmeasures: 24_8_management
IDspecies: 24
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: containment
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #9
startDate: 2018-02-03
endDate: 2024-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
SN: 
Beendigung der Förderung der Nutria durch gezielte Fütterung, Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (Infoblatt), Information an Tierparks
MV:
Ab 2018 ist Jagd in M-V zugelassen, daher keine Ausnahmen mehr erforderlich. Da Jagd keine Managementmaßnahme darstellt, hier keine Berücksichtigung.	
SH: 
Die Öffentlichkeit wurde über verschiedene Medien über die potentielle Gefährdung der heimischen Artenvielfalt durch die Nutria informiert. Durch die weite Verbreitung der Art, ist eine Priorisierung (Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse) vorzunehmen bevor Maßnahmen ergriffen werden. Prioritäre Maßnahmen beim Nutria wären die Unterbindung der Ausbreitung auf nicht besiedelte Inseln und der aktive Schutz gefährdeter Ökosysteme. Es wurden bisher keine prioritären Maßnahmen identifiziert.	
TH: Öffentlichkeits-/Aufklärungsarbeit (Sensibilisierung der Nutriahalter). Beseitigung von Nutrias


IDmeasures: 25_3_management
IDspecies: 25
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #4
startDate: 2018-07-16
endDate: 2018-07-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
MV: Die Art wurde erstmalig im November 2018 im Bundesland Mecklenburg-Vorpommern an einem Standort entdeckt (Teich). Beseitigungsmaßnahmen werden aktuell vorbereitet.
NW: An kleinem Stillgewässer erfolgreich beseitigt (zur Zeit noch Nachkontrollen), an Fließgewässern nicht mit vertretbarem Aufwand zu bekämpfen, im Kreis Kleve wurden Maßnahmen im Jahr 2015 erfolglos eingestellt,  bis jetzt keine Maßnahmen in der kontinentalen Region.


IDmeasures: 29_3_management
IDspecies: 29
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: stable
objective: containment
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #4
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2024-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
NRW Lokales Absammeln/Fang zum Schutz autochtoner Edelkrebsbestände in der kontinentalen Region
BB	Art wird fischereilich nicht genutzt. Managementmaßnahmen nur mit unverhältnismäßigem Aufwand durchführbar.
BE	Öffentlichkeitsarbeit
MV	Die Aufwand-Nutzen-Relation ist so ungünstig, dass der Beseitigung/Eindämmung der Art keine Priorität zugeordnet werden kann.
NI	Eine Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse und eine Priorisierung von Maßnahmen ist bisher noch nicht abschließend durchgeführt worden, daher wird mit einer Umsetzung von Maßnahmen ggf. zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt begonnen. 
SH	Die Öffentlichkeit wurde über verschiedene Medien über die potentielle Gefährdung der heimischen Artenvielfalt durch den Kamberkrebs informiert. Der Kamberkrebs ist in Schleswig-Holstein bereits weit verbreitet. Da ein Zurückdrängen aus bereits besiedelten Gewässern kaum Aussicht auf Erfolg hat, liegt der Fokus bei dieser Art auf der Verhinderung der Besiedlung noch nicht besiedelter Gewässer und dem Schutz von Populationen des einheimischen Edelkrebses. Im Berichtszeitraum konnten keine Gebiete identifiziert werden, in denen eine Besiedlung sensibler Gebiete mit geeigneten Maßnahmen hätte verhindert werden können.
SN   	Maßnahmen, die auf das Zurückdrängen aus bereits besiedelten Gewässern abzielen, sind nicht sehr erfolgversprechend.
TH	Öffentlichkeits-/Aufklärungsarbeit (Sensibilisierung der Angelverbände  zur Verminderung der direkten und indirekten anthropogenen Förderung der Art), Reusenbefischungen, Aufnahme von Auflagen in Fischerei-Hegepläne zur Beseitigung von invasiven Krebsarten in Freilandgewässern


IDmeasures: 32_4_management
IDspecies: 32
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #5
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2024-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
BB	Art wird fischereilich nicht genutzt. Managementmaßnahmen nur mit unverhältnismäßigem Aufwand durchführbar.
MV	 Die Aufwand-Nutzen-Relation ist so ungünstig, dass der Beseitigung/Eindämmung der Art keine Priorität zugeordnet werden kann. Entscheidend sind auch die Kollateralschäden, die Bekämpfungsmaßnahmen mit unklarem Ergebnis hervorrufen könnten
NI	Eine Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse und eine Priorisierung von Maßnahmen ist bisher noch nicht abschließend durchgeführt worden, daher wird mit einer Umsetzung von Maßnahmen ggf. zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt begonnen. 
SH	Die Öffentlichkeit wurde über verschiedene Medien über die potentielle Gefährdung der heimischen Artenvielfalt durch den Signalkrebs informiert. Der Signalkrebs tritt in Schleswig-Holstein vereinzelt in Gewässern auf. Da ein Zurückdrängen aus bereits besiedelten Gewässern kaum Aussicht auf Erfolg hat, liegt der Fokus bei dieser Art auf der Verhinderung der Besiedlung noch nicht besiedelter Gewässer und dem Schutz von Populationen des einheimischen Edelkrebses. Im Berichtszeitraum konnten keine Gebiete identifiziert werden, in denen eine Besiedlung sensibler Gebiete mit geeigneten Maßnahmen hätte verhindert werden können.
SN	Maßnahmen, die auf das Zurückdrängen aus bereits besiedelten Gewässern abzielen, sind nicht sehr erfolgversprechend.
TH	Öffentlichkeits-/Aufklärungsarbeit (Sensibilisierung der Angelverbände  zur Verminderung der direkten und indirekten anthropogenen Förderung der Art), Reusenbefischungen, Aufnahme von Auflagen in Fischerei-Hegepläne zur Beseitigung von invasiven Krebsarten in Freilandgewässern


IDmeasures: 37_4_management
IDspecies: 37
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #5
startDate: 2015-09-01
endDate: 2024-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
BB: Art wird fischereilich nicht genutzt. Managementmaßnahmen nur mit unverhältnismäßigem Aufwand durchführbar.	
BE: Öffentlichkeitsarbeit	
NI: Eine Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse und eine Priorisierung von Maßnahmen ist bisher noch nicht abschließend durchgeführt worden, daher wird mit einer Umsetzung von Maßnahmen ggf. zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt begonnen. 	
NW: Entnahme punktuell in Stillgewässern der atlantischen Region zum Schutz der Wechselkröte, hier rückläufige Population des Roten Amerikanischen Sumpfkrebses. 	
TH: Öffentlichkeits-/Aufklärungsarbeit (Sensibilisierung der Angelverbände  zur Verminderung der direkten und indirekten anthropogenen Förderung der Art), Reusenbefischungen, Aufnahme von Auflagen in Fischerei-Hegepläne zur Beseitigung von invasiven Krebsarten in Freilandgewässern


IDmeasures: 38_1_management
IDspecies: 38
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2018-06-08
endDate: 2024-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
NI: Eine Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse und eine Priorisierung von Maßnahmen ist bisher noch nicht abschließend durchgeführt worden, daher wird mit einer Umsetzung von Maßnahmen ggf. zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt begonnen. 	
TH: Öffentlichkeits-/Aufklärungsarbeit (Sensibilisierung der Angelverbände  zur Verminderung der direkten und indirekten anthropogenen Förderung der Art), Reusenbefischungen, Aufnahme von Auflagen in Fischerei-Hegepläne zur Beseitigung von invasiven Krebsarten in Freilandgewässern


IDmeasures: 23_0_management
IDspecies: 23
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2017-04-06
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-Surveillance on the field with cameras (no observation). 
-Active communication to local hunters (hunting council) for shooting individuals. 
-Muntjac are present in several private woods without access authorization
-Management ongoing, no end date specified


IDmeasures: 23_1_management
IDspecies: 23
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2017-11-29
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-Surveillance on the field with cameras (no observation). 
-Active communication to local hunters (hunting council) for shooting individuals. 
-Muntjac are present in several private woods without access authorization
-Management ongoing, no end date specified yet


IDmeasures: 23_2_management
IDspecies: 23
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2014-01-01
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
The species has been subject to (limited) culling efforts before its entry into force. Since its entry into force, initiatives on legislation and communication have been taken with the aim of intensifying its control. Government efforts so far focused mainly on the enforcement of restrictions on illegaly owned muntiac (with over 100 such specimens detected as of March 2019).


IDmeasures: 24_0_management
IDspecies: 24
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: increasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-08-03
endDate: 2017-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-In the Semois (side river Meuse): 54 individuals captured in traps in 2017. 
-In the Sambre (side river Meuse): 30 individuals were shot in 2016; 41 were shot and/or captured in 2017. 
Nevertheless we see a large progression of the species in the bassins of the Sambre, the Viroin and the Semois-chiers. The management was done with traps (lethal) and shooting. Management was stopped because the neccesary permits were not delivered (authorisation for bearing of arms for the agents in charge of the management, as well as an absence of a ministerial accord to use lethal traps). 


IDmeasures: 24_1_management
IDspecies: 24
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: containment
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2014-01-01
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
The species has been subject to control efforts even before 2014. A government-led, territory-wide control programme on musk rat and coypu is operational.


IDmeasures: 25_0_management
IDspecies: 25
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
Test at two pilot sites. Management consisted of pulling the plants from the soil. 
The test is still ongoing, no date has been put forward. 


IDmeasures: 25_1_management
IDspecies: 25
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
Various populations have been subject to eradication efforts. Since its entry into force, initiatives on legislation and communication have been taken with the aim of intensifying its control.
No end date has been specified. 


IDmeasures: 26_0_management
IDspecies: 26
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: increasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-Pilot site where pulling of the plant was tested. There was a large expansion seen after management. Another management method has to be found.
-Management of the population is still ongoing, no end date specified yet.


IDmeasures: 26_1_management
IDspecies: 26
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: containment
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-No end-date specified yet
-Some populations have been subject to eradication efforts. Since its entry into force, initiatives on legislation and communication have been taken with the aim of intensifying its control.


IDmeasures: 28_0_management
IDspecies: 28
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2000-01-01
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-The management already started in 1997, well before the entry into force of the Regulation.
-Lethal traps and poisoned feed is used. 
-About 29 000 individuals were captured in the traps in the period of 2016-2018.  
-Lack of measures in the field to have a real impact on the populations. 


IDmeasures: 28_1_management
IDspecies: 28
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: containment
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2014-01-01
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-No end-date of management in sight.
-The species has been subject to control efforts well before its entry into force. A government-led, territory-wide control programme on musk rat and coypu is operational.


IDmeasures: 39_14_management
IDspecies: 39
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #15
startDate: 2018-02-01
endDate: 2024-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
ST: Zum Schutz der Brut in Greifvogelhorsten wurden Überkletterschutzmanschetten an entsprechenden Horstbäumen angebracht. Außerdem wurden Einzäunungen zum Schutz von Bodenbrütern vorgenommen. In beiden Fällen handelt es sich um mechanische Verfahren, Auswirkungen auf Nicht-Zielarten wurden nicht festgestellt.
SH	Die Öffentlichkeit wurde über verschiedene Medien über die potentielle Gefährdung der heimischen Artenvielfalt durch den Waschbären informiert. Durch die weite Verbreitung der Art, ist eine Priorisierung (Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse) vorzunehmen bevor Maßnahmen ergriffen werden. Prioritäre Maßnahmen beim Waschbären wären die Unterbindung der Ausbreitung auf nicht besiedelte Inseln und der aktive Schutz in ihrer Population gefährdeter Beutetierarten. Es wurden bisher keine prioritären Maßnahmen identifiziert.	
TH: Öffentlichkeits-/Aufklärungsarbeit (Aufklärung der Bevölkerung; Sensibilisierung der  Jägerschaft zur Verminderung der direkten und indirekten anthropogenen Förderung der Art). Verleih von Lebendfallen an Privatpersonen, Fang und Tötung von Exemplaren durch Jagdausübungsberechtigte, Schutzmaßnahmen für durch den Waschbär bedrohte Arten, Sterilisation eines Tieres in Privatbesitz.
MV: Wirkungen der Maßnahmen nur temporär und kleinräumig möglich. 


IDmeasures: 40_3_management
IDspecies: 40
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #4
startDate: 2018-02-03
endDate: 2024-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
BB	Art wird fischereilich nicht genutzt. Art und Umfang der Bekämpfung werden derzeit geprüft.
BE Öffentlichkeitsarbeit
MV	Keine Maßnahmen für Fließgewässer bekannt, die ein günstiges Verhältnis zwischen Aufwand/Nutzen und Kollateralschäden besitzen. Daher Verzicht auf Maßnahmen.
NI	Eine Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse und eine Priorisierung von Maßnahmen ist bisher noch nicht abschließend durchgeführt worden, daher wird mit einer Umsetzung von Maßnahmen ggf. zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt begonnen. 
NW	Keine gravierenden Konflikte mit heimischen Arten
SH	Die Öffentlichkeit wurde über verschiedene Medien über die potentielle Gefährdung der heimischen Artenvielfalt durch den Blaubandbärbling informiert. Bisher konnten keine zielführenden Managementmaßnahmen gegen Freilandvorkommen dieser Art geplant werden. Vorrang bei dieser Art hat die Unterbindung der Ausbreitung durch den Menschen, vor allem im Zuge des unabsichtlichen Verbringens bei Besatzmaßnahmen anderer Fischarten.
TH	Öffentlichkeits-/Aufklärungsarbeit (Sensibilisierung der Angelverbände  zur Verminderung der direkten und indirekten anthropogenen Förderung der Art). Elektrobefischung. Einsatz natürlicher Prädatoren.


IDmeasures: 46_9_management
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
effectiveness: stable
objective: containment
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #10
startDate: 2018-02-03
endDate: 2024-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfo:
SN: Zulassung der Weitergabe von in menschlicher Obhut befindlichen Tieren und dadurch Verhinderung von Freisetzung.
TH: Öffentlichkeits-/Aufklärungsarbeit (Information der privaten Halter zur Verhinderung von Fortpflanzung und Freisetzung in die Natur) und Aufnahme von Fundtieren/herrenlosen Tieren und Weitervermittlung an neue zuverlässige Tierhalter
BB: Ökologische Auswirkungen und Bekämpfungsmöglichkeiten werden derzeit geprüft.	
SH: Die Öffentlichkeit wurde über verschiedene Medien über die potentielle Gefährdung der heimischen Artenvielfalt durch die Buchstaben-Schmuck¬schildkröte informiert. Eine Ent¬nahme von Tieren aus dem Freiland wurde in Schleswig-Holstein in keinem Gebiet als prioritär (Kosten-Nutzen-Abwägung) eingestuft, da in den bekannten Vorkommens¬gebieten der Art eine interspezifische Konkurrenz insbesondere zur Europäischen Sumpfschildkröte (in SH nicht vorkommend) nicht zu befürchten ist. Vorkommen in Gewässern in denen eine starke Prädation von Amphibienlarven auftritt, sind nicht bekannt. Weiter¬hin ist davon auszugehen, dass unter den jetzigen klimatischen Be¬dingungen in SH eine Fortpflanzung der Art aus¬geschlossen ist.


IDmeasures: 28_0_management
IDspecies: 28
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfo:
Kontrolė vykdoma medžiojant ondatras ištisus metus neribojant jų skaičiaus leistinais būdais pagal teisės aktus.


IDmeasures: 7_0_eradication
IDspecies: 7
IDreport: MT-2015-2018
country: MT
effectiveness: decreasing
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018-06-01
endDate: 2020-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/mt/eu/ias/envxnq1nw
addInfo:
Following initial eradication action taken during summer 2018, a number of specimens of Eicchornia crassipes were recorded again during winter-spring 2018/2019. Repeat mechanical removal has been carried out in summer 2019. Further action will be taken, if necessary, to ensure complete eradication of the species in the current single location where it is found. 


IDmeasures: 34_0_management
IDspecies: 34
IDreport: MT-2015-2018
country: MT
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018-09-01
endDate: 2024-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/mt/eu/ias/envxnq1nw
addInfo:
Control and eradication measures are ongoing however, noting the spread and nature of the species in question the end date of the measures could not be determined. 

Most of the smaller populations recorded on the island of Gozo were successfully eradicated during 2018; the areas are being monitored. Malta is keeping note of the populations being reported (even through citizen science processes) for relevant action to be taken accordingly.

To date, the measures entailed mechanical/physical removal and hence non-targeted species were not impacted. Furthermore, several populations occur in urban areas (pavements, roadsides, walls etc.)


IDmeasures: 34_1_management
IDspecies: 34
IDreport: MT-2015-2018
country: MT
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2018-08-01
endDate: 2024-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/mt/eu/ias/envxnq1nw
addInfo:
Control and eradication measures are ongoing however, noting the spread and nature of the species in question the end date of the measures could not be determined. Indeed, while action has been taken for selected populations to be controlled, some re-establishment was noted (due to seed bank in soil, growth from rhizomes which were difficult to remove completely); monitoring is being considered for follow-up action in this regard.

Malta is keeping note of the populations being reported (even through citizen science processes), for relevant action to be taken accordingly. A number of additional actions are planned for the coming months.

To date, the measures entailed mechanical/physical removal and hence non-targeted species were not impacted. Furthermore, several populations are in urban areas (pavements, roadsides, walls etc.) or close to habitats of low ecological value.

A single population was used as a trial for the application of a herbicide (Quizalofop). For the continued management of the crimson fountaingrass, integrated control (combination of adequate plant protection products and mechanical control) is being considered. The use of plant protection products nonetheless, shall be carefully assessed and due caution taken to ensure the safety of non-targeted species including native plants and pollinating insects as well, as non-living environmental elements (e.g. surface waters and soil).   
  


IDmeasures: 7_0_eradication
IDspecies: 7
IDreport: PT-2015-2018
country: PT
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pt/eu/ias/envyz_mka
addInfo:
Actions implemented by EDIA, in the period between 2012 and 2018 (1st semester), in the amount of €255 161.00 (these costs do not include any material of lesser value, as well as the repair of equipment.
In 2017, the ACECA project (Actions for the control and elimination of the water hyacinth in the cross-border section of the Guadiana river. Main beneficiary: Guadiana Hydrographic Confederation. Partners: Junta of Extremadura, EDIA and APA/ARH-Alentejo) was approved, which allowed EDIA to acquire more means to support the control of the species. projeto ACECA (https://www.interregeurope.eu/invalis/news/news-article/6899/invalis-project-in-the-aceca-conference/)
In 2017 a short film was made about the process of collecting the species (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkcD1-4t0F8)
International course on Aquatic Invasive Alien Species on the Guadiana River, prepared in collaboration between EDIA and Beja Polytechnic Institute, which took place in 2018 and included higher education students from 6 countries.


IDmeasures: 17_0_eradication
IDspecies: 17
IDreport: PT-2015-2018
country: PT
effectiveness: increasing
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2017-12-17
endDate: 2017-12-31
envelope_link: https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pt/eu/ias/envyz_mka
addInfo:
Eradication of the species in a channel that lies obliquely to the main course of the river. Manual removal of the plants using hand tools and removal of the uprooted plants using machinery from the margin. A barrier was set to avoid fragments to be washed into the river. Plants were placed in plastic containers to dry and then destroyed. 
Some of the native vegetation may also have been uprooted by mistake or due to the proximity of roots from Lagarosiphon.
Fragments escaped the intervention area and the species reestablished in downriver areas


IDmeasures: 47_0_management
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: PT-2015-2018
country: PT
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pt/eu/ias/envyz_mka
addInfo:
Impacts due to the use of entomological traps to capture/kill Asian hornets particularly around apiaries and during the period when the queen hornets leave hibernation.
Nest destruction is essentially dine by incineration (no impacts on other species) or by chemical methods. In this case, if some chemically treated nests remain in the environment, negative effects may happen.


IDmeasures: 11_0_management
IDspecies: 11
IDreport: EE-2015-2018
country: EE
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Digging of colonies
startDate: 2005-05-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ee/eu/ias/envxlxidq
addInfo:
Digging is considered the most effective method with no impacts on native species if done correctly. This also the most costly and labour intensive method.
Digging is the preferred method in areas where chemical control is not possible (close to waterways, in eco-farms) and also in sparse colonies to remove the last plants.


IDmeasures: 11_1_management
IDspecies: 11
IDreport: EE-2015-2018
country: EE
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Chemical control
startDate: 2007-05-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ee/eu/ias/envxlxidq
addInfo:
Glyphosate is considered the most cost-effective measure and is mostly done in large and dense colonies.


IDmeasures: 12_1_management
IDspecies: 12
IDreport: EE-2015-2018
country: EE
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Chemical control
startDate: 2006-05-01
endDate: 2016-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ee/eu/ias/envxlxidq
addInfo:
Glyphosate is considered the most cost-effective measure and is mostly done in large and dense colonies.


IDmeasures: 32_0_management
IDspecies: 32
IDreport: HU-2015-2018
country: HU
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/hu/eu/ias/envxgklzg
addInfo:
There was a crayfish monitoring program in 2018 in Hungary which concerned all native and non-native crayfish in the country. Unfortunately this species is widespread in Hungary and it is almost impossible to halt the growing of it's population. The only manner is if fishers do not allow back the catched individuals to the water. 


IDmeasures: 35_0_management
IDspecies: 35
IDreport: HU-2015-2018
country: HU
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/hu/eu/ias/envxgklzg
addInfo:
Perccottus glenii is a widespread alien invasive species in Hungary, which occures in smaller and bigger rivers and lakes. It is considered to be an invader which has strong populations in Hungary. The experts of national park directorates are tring to reduce their populations with fishing and trapping In some important habitats of Umbra krameri and in nature conservation areas. Usually they use electric fishing machines. Unfortunately outside of nature conservation areas the species is spreading continuously.


IDmeasures: 11_1_management
IDspecies: 11
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2002-01-01
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
- No impact on other species, selective manual method
- Management ongoing and no end date has been set


IDmeasures: 11_2_management
IDspecies: 11
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2014-01-01
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-Numerous populations have been subject to eradication efforts, by different authorities and practitioners. Since its entry into force, initiatives on legislation and communication have been taken with the aim of intensifying its control.


IDmeasures: 2_0_management
IDspecies: 2
IDreport: HU-2015-2018
country: HU
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/hu/eu/ias/envxgklzg
addInfo:
Asclepias syriaca is a widespread alien invasive species in Hungary, which occurs in almost all types of open habitats. It is considered to be an invader which spread very quickly in degraded habitats. It is difficult to control, its spread is continuous in the last decades. In the frame of LIFE and other nature conservation projects, the experts of national park directorates are trying to reduce their populations in nature conservation areas. The only effective method is mowing three times combined with chemical and mechanical (i.e. grazing) treatment two times. It is essential to continue these treatments otherwise the species appears again. Unfortunately outside of nature conservation areas the species is spreading continuously.  


IDmeasures: 16_0_management
IDspecies: 16
IDreport: HU-2015-2018
country: HU
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/hu/eu/ias/envxgklzg
addInfo:
Impatiens glandulifera is a widespread alien invasive species in Hungary, which occures particularly along rivers, creeks and cannals. It is considered to be an invader which has strong populations in Hungary locally. It is difficult to control because it occurs in hardly accessible areas. Mechanical treatment could be effective however this activity should be carried out in May, before flowering. It is essential to continue these treatments otherwise the species appears again. 


IDmeasures: 24_0_eradication
IDspecies: 24
IDreport: HU-2015-2018
country: HU
effectiveness: decreasing
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2017-03-17
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/hu/eu/ias/envxgklzg
addInfo:
The first reproduction of Coypu was in 2017 in Hungary, along the river Ipoly (Danube River Basin). After the first observation, collection process was started to clear up the situation of the species in the area and also in the country. It turned out from the available observations that the species is more numerous than it was known before. It is cleared there is a continuous spreading from the neighboring countries, Austria and Slovakia. For this reason, any action for elimination of this species is extremely difficult. Nevertheless, reproduction event has not been proven in any other occurrence. Locality of occurrences has also been refined. On the other hand, according to the casual observations along rivers, lakes, etc. we assume that the species is breeding in Hungary regularly, especially along the Danube river and its offsets. We have a monitoring program since 2017 and we have drawn all national government authorities attention to take action to reduce the coypu's population. Hunting is one of the most important tool, therefore the national government authorities have contacted the local hunting societies to hunt the species. An other method is trapping, what we will also use, although it is more difficult. 


IDmeasures: 28_0_management
IDspecies: 28
IDreport: HU-2015-2018
country: HU
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/hu/eu/ias/envxgklzg
addInfo:
The species has been present since the 1910s in Hungary. It is found in wetlands (rivers, lakes, artificial ponds, etc.). Because of its lifestyle (usually active at night or near dawn and dusk, etc.) there are few observations however it seems that the whole population is decreasing. The reasons are unknown. As a huntable species, in every year many individuals were killed by hunters (2015-2016: 33, 2016-2017: 74, 2017-2018: 38 individuals).


IDmeasures: 29_0_management
IDspecies: 29
IDreport: HU-2015-2018
country: HU
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/hu/eu/ias/envxgklzg
addInfo:
There was a crayfish monitoring program in 2018 in Hungary which concerned all native and non-native crayfish in the country. Unfortunately this species is widespread in Hungary and it is almost impossible to halt the growing of it's population. The only manner is if fishers do not allow back the catched individuals to the water.


IDmeasures: 40_0_management
IDspecies: 40
IDreport: HU-2015-2018
country: HU
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/hu/eu/ias/envxgklzg
addInfo:
Pseudorasbora parva is a widespread alien invasive species in Hungary, which occures in smaller and bigger rivers and lakes. It is considered to be an invader which has strong populations in Hungary. The experts of national park directorates are tring to reduce their populations with fishing and trapping In some important habitats of Umbra krameri and in nature conservation areas. Usually they use electric fishing machines. Unfortunately outside of nature conservation areas the species is spreading continuously. From legal aspects, it is strictly forbidden to use the non-native fish species (including invasive species) as a bait.


IDmeasures: 0_0_management
IDspecies: 0
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-08-03
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
- Management ongoing with undetermined end-date 
- Selective shooting of birds ensures there is no negative impact on non-target species


IDmeasures: 0_1_management
IDspecies: 0
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2013-01-01
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
- Management ongoing with undetermined end date
- Management through egg control ensures there is no negative impact on other species


IDmeasures: 0_2_management
IDspecies: 0
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2010-01-01
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-The species has been subject to culling efforts well before the entry into force of the Regulation. These (uncoordinated) efforts were undertaken primarily by hunters. Since its entry into force, initiatives on legislation and communication have been taken with the aim of intensifying its control. 
- Summer counts indicate a relatively stable population since 2013, but the period is too short to clearly state this.


IDmeasures: 2_0_management
IDspecies: 2
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-01-01
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-Some pilot sites are being managed in Etalle
-The species is being pulled out of the ground in the spring, and the process is repeated in august
-No specified end date


IDmeasures: 3_0_management
IDspecies: 3
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-08-03
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
Coastal populations of this species have been subject to eradication efforts. Since its entry into force, initiatives on legislation and communication have been taken with the aim of intensifying its control.


IDmeasures: 4_0_management
IDspecies: 4
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-08-03
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-The largest known population has been subject to eradication efforts (currently under aftercare). No other thriving populations are known, but plant fragments have been found in watercourses (with unknown source). Therefore, the trend is unclear.


IDmeasures: 9_0_management
IDspecies: 9
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-08-03
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
Since its entry into force, initiatives on legislation and communication have been taken with the aim of intensifying control of the species. Measures are taken mostly by local authorities and practitioners, at specific locations where significant ecological damage or socio-economic nuisance is reported.


IDmeasures: 11_0_management
IDspecies: 11
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2012-01-01
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
- Management in Wallonia in place since 2011. Large populations ( larger than 100 individuals) were managed by the Service public Wallonne via public tenders, small population were managed by local managers (community, province, river basin contracts). A total of 3863 populations have been discovered since 2012. 22% of these are considered to be eradicated (of which 13 large populations). In 2017, 1222 actions have been realised (102 large populations) and 1359 in 2018  (118 large populations).
- No impact on other species, selective method
- Management ongoing and no end date has been set


IDmeasures: 15_0_management
IDspecies: 15
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-08-03
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-In the continental bioregion, 6 sites are under management for the second year, and one site for the first year. Populations are clearly decreasing but eradication has not been accomplished. A minimum of three years of management or even more will be needed. 
-All the known populations of the CON bioregion are being managed except Gedinne (CRHM, no authorisation to acces the site).  


IDmeasures: 15_1_management
IDspecies: 15
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2016-08-03
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
- Local action by river basin contracts, natural parcs, provinces or Département Nature et Forêt (DNF) in nature reserves.


IDmeasures: 15_2_management
IDspecies: 15
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2014-01-01
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
The species has been subject to widespread control efforts well before its inclusion on the Union list (even before 2014). Since its entry into force, initiatives on legislation and communication have been taken with the aim of intensifying its control.


IDmeasures: 16_0_management
IDspecies: 16
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
- Management per water basins within Wallonia initiated well before list adoption, but management is more active in some basins than others, depending on the motivation of the river protection associations and their potential to take action (funds, time, acces to private land, ...).
- Local decrease of some populations thanks to the coordinated management by river protection association (e.g. Haute Meuse and de Dijle). In rivers with wide floodplain (e.g. Ourthe), results are less convincing. 
- No end date of management is already fixed. 


IDmeasures: 16_2_management
IDspecies: 16
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2014-01-01
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
Numerous populations have been subject to eradication efforts, by different authorities and practitioners. Since its entry into force, initiatives on legislation and communication have been taken with the aim of intensifying its control.


IDmeasures: 17_0_management
IDspecies: 17
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-4 pilote sites have been managed in 2017 and 2018 by pulling the plants out. New populations  have been discovered in 2017 and 2018. Not all populations are managed (e.g. Floreffe) because it is technically very complex to pull out the plants on those sites. The results of the management that is put in place is not very effective (because the roots are very hard to reach). Other management techniques will be tested in the future like water drawdown and jute matting. 
-No end date has been specified


IDmeasures: 17_1_management
IDspecies: 17
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-Various populations have been subject to eradication efforts. Since its entry into force, initiatives on legislation and communication have been taken with the aim of intensifying its control.
-No end date for the management has been specified


IDmeasures: 18_0_management
IDspecies: 18
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
Only one population known in Wallonia which has been under management since several years with electric fishing and shooting (start of the action), but mostly by live capture with the aid of traps for adults and larval stages. 
2016 : 23 adults, 87 larval, 10 traps
2017 : 68 adults, 701 larval, 22 traps
2018 : 1 adult male, 4 juveniles, 1244 larval, 42 traps 


IDmeasures: 18_1_management
IDspecies: 18
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: containment
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2014-01-01
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-Management started before 2014, no end date specified yet
-The species has been subject to control efforts before its entry into force. Since its entry into force, initiatives on legislation and communication have been taken with the aim of intensifying its control. The current objective is to contain the population within the valley of the Grote Nete. Priority is therefore given to downstream and upstream control, together with a rapid response on far-away populations. In addition to standard control using fyke nets for larvae, airgun shooting of adults is gradually gaining importance.


IDmeasures: 19_0_management
IDspecies: 19
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: stable
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
- End date for management has not been specified yet.
- 7 out of 8 population are managed in the Continental zone. 1 population is not managed because the permit has not yet been delivered. The effect of the measures in place still has to be checked on the long term because the extraction of the roots is complicated and has a big impact on the results. 
The species is not managed in the Atlantic bioregion because of limited resources and the extent of the population making eradication (as in the Continental bioregion) very difficult.


IDmeasures: 19_1_management
IDspecies: 19
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
Various populations have been subject to eradication efforts. Since its entry into force, initiatives on legislation and communication have been taken with the aim of intensifying its control.


IDmeasures: 20_0_management
IDspecies: 20
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
-Various populations have been subject to eradication efforts. Since its entry into force, initiatives on legislation and communication have been taken with the aim of intensifying its control. No end date has been specified.


IDmeasures: 21_0_management
IDspecies: 21
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
11 populations were managed in 2017. The management of the largest population has been taken into 2018 (Communne de Rendeux). Multiple populations have been eradicated by the management actions in 2017. However, a yearly control visit should be realised for multiple subsequent years to be sure. Not all known populations have been managed due to a prohibition of private owners to enter their land. 


IDmeasures: 21_1_management
IDspecies: 21
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2016-03-08
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
Some populations have been subject to eradication efforts. Since its entry into force, initiatives on legislation and communication have been taken with the aim of intensifying its control. No end date has been specified for the management.


IDmeasures: 23_0_eradication
IDspecies: 23
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: unclear
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2017-09-30
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
Active surveillance on the field with cameras. Population estimated at least five individuals (two males et 3 females), probably 7. Identificaiton of actif period of animals (mainly night) and localisation of activity.  Trapping test with boar cages was not concluant. Test of lookout during the day was not concluant. Test of lookout during the night : animal was seen and 3 indivuals (2 males) have been shot without suitable material for night shooting. Afterwards, night shooting was not autorizathed by minister.   


IDmeasures: 0_0_management
IDspecies: 0
IDreport: FR-2015-2018
country: FR
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018
endDate: en cours
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fr/eu/ias/envxouw3q
addInfo:
Pas d'autorisations ni de contrôles d'établissements, du fait de la mise en place de la réglementation nationale en 2018, et d'un démarrage effectif en 2019


IDmeasures: 0_21_management
IDspecies: 0
IDreport: FR-2015-2018
country: FR
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #22
startDate: 2016
endDate: en cours
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fr/eu/ias/envxouw3q
addInfo:
La gestion de l'ouette d'Egypte se réalise département par département jusqu'à aujourd'hui en autorisant en général les professionnels comme les agents de l'ONCFS à prélever les oiseaux toute l'année et les chasseurs sur la saison de chasse des oies. Ces derniers sont associés uniquement dans les départements où l'espèce est "abondante", c'est à dire l'est et le nord de la France. Ailleurs, il est recherché un prélèvement des individus observés à l'unité. Les effets de cette gestion ne semblent pas réduire notoirement l'expansion de l'espèce, celle-ci étant également présente dans des sites où la destruction par tir ne peut avoir lieu (zones urbaines). Sa présence en captivité avant la mise en place de la nouvelle réglementaiton est également un facteur de dissémination de l'espèce. 


IDmeasures: 47_1_eradication
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2017-09-24
endDate: 2017-12-24
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
- Potential impact of the insecticide on non-target insect species. However, this impact is undocumented and considered as low since the insecticide was used at the end of the season. 
- After an attack on a beehive, a nest was found and neutralised 


IDmeasures: 47_2_eradication
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2017-08-01
endDate: 2018-11-21
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
The very first sightings of V. velutina in the Flemish Region (in 2017) have been notified for rapid response under Articles 16 and 17 (cases Belgium#2 and Belgium#3). Each of the observed nests from these cases has been destroyed. Nonetheless, the species has shown a sharp increase in numbers and distribution since. As of 2018, the species is therefore regarded as a widespread species (under Article 19).


IDmeasures: 47_0_management
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: increasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018-01-01
endDate: 2030-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
- No end date has been specified
- 22 nest were destroyed in 2018. Not all nests were found and attacks in apiaries did not stop.
- Techniques:  Insecticide for the nest and traps to capture spring queens before they nest


IDmeasures: 47_1_management
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2018-01-01
endDate: 2020-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfo:
From 10/05/2018 (the 1st observation of that year) to 19/10/2018, the total number of validated records of hornet specimens counted 101. All five provinces of Flanders have become affected, with overall spread appearing to be eastwards. In 23 occasions, a nest has been localized, in all cases of which it has been successfully destroyed.
-No end date of the management has been foreseen


IDmeasures: 17_0_management
IDspecies: 17
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
Mechanical removal of plants. These are local measures by water boards and sometimes by municipalities.The costs of all measures for (all) water plants by water boards in the Netherlands are roughly estimated at 4 million euro annually. These measures take place in the context of the regular management of watercourses.


IDmeasures: 18_0_eradication
IDspecies: 18
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2015-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
The species is eradicated but there is threat of influx from Belgium. In Limburg the remnants of a former popultation around Baarlo were eradicated in 2015 by draining ponds and catching. In Noord-Brabant an early warning system is established by using eDNA (INVEXO project).


IDmeasures: 19_0_management
IDspecies: 19
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
Mechanical or manual removal of plants. These are local measures by water boards and sometimes by nature managers and municipalities. The costs of all measures for (all) water plants by water boards in the Netherlands are roughly estimated at 4 million euro annually. These measures take place in the context of the regular management of watercourses. In Limburg the Department of Public Works (Rijkswaterstaat) and a nature manager (Natuurmonumenten) have started a pilot with measures.


IDmeasures: 20_0_management
IDspecies: 20
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
Draining and mechanical removal in two locations (Tiengemeten and Valkenburg) in Zuid-Holland. Effects must be studied in 2019. Earlier actions in Tiengemeten were unsuccesfull and had to be repeated in 2018.


IDmeasures: 21_0_management
IDspecies: 21
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2017-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
Plants were removed on a number of sites. In Gelderland an inventory of sites is made in order to start an eradication program.


IDmeasures: 23_0_management
IDspecies: 23
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
Designation of wildlife management units to shoot animals in some provinces. Cameratraps are placed, but no animal was sighted.


IDmeasures: 24_0_management
IDspecies: 24
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
Coypu has been eradicated since 2013. From 2013, it is about controlling the influx of Coypu from Germany in particular. There is no breeding population in The Netherlands. 


IDmeasures: 25_0_management
IDspecies: 25
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
Mechanical removal of plants. These are local measures by water boards. The costs of all measures for (all) waterplants by water boards in the Netherlands are roughly estimated at 4 million euro annually. These measures take place in the context of the regular management of watercourses.


IDmeasures: 28_0_management
IDspecies: 28
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
Occasionally other animals are caught in the muskrat traps, such as otters, rats and crayfish. In 2019 the impact of the muskrat on biodiversity has been published: https://muskusrattenbestrijding.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Invloed-van-muskusratten-op-biodiversiteit-2019.pdf


IDmeasures: 29_0_management
IDspecies: 29
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
A general exemption for fishing invasive cray fish species is regulated under the Nature protection Act. Fishing with commercial fishing gears (i.e. fykes) is exclusively for commercial fishermen (based on the Fisheries Law 1963). Next to a public license, a private permission from the owner of the water area or fishing rights is required, for example regional water management authorities. In some areas of water management authorities (in the provinces of Noord-Brabant, Noord-Holland and Utrecht) research and elimination projects are being carried out, amongst others subsidized by the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF). 


IDmeasures: 36_1_eradication
IDspecies: 36
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2018-08-09
endDate: 2018-08-20
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
Contaminant nursery material. In a shipment of bonsai two plants were found during an inspection. The plants have been removed and destroyed.


IDmeasures: 37_0_eradication
IDspecies: 37
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018-11-12
endDate: 2019-01-18
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
Dutch Customs Officers based at Schiphol Airport intercepted a shipment which contained 80 living specimens. 


IDmeasures: 47_0_eradication
IDspecies: 47
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
effectiveness: increasing
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2017-09-17
endDate: 2018-11-10
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfo:
In 2017 and 2018 three nests were located in the provinces Zeeland and Zuid-Holland. These nests were succesfully eradicated (nest destroyed and wasps gassed). Sometimes a drone was used to locate the nests. One abandoned nest was discovered in the autumn of 2018. Probability that more nests were missed and therefore expected progress of this species and increase of number of sightings in 2019. Also because of steady influx from Belgium. Species can not be stopped. No alternative measures are available at the moment. 


IDmeasures: 2_0_management
IDspecies: 2
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-01-01
endDate: 2020-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfo:
Management measures are taken on the property of the Municipality of Ljubljana and in Landscape Park Goričko. In the Landscape Park Goričko 2 specimens were removed in 2017 and actions on rising public awareness are regular (Facebook, articles in local media and in the internet (http://www.park-goricko.org/sl/informacije.asp?id_informacija=6168&id_jezik=0&id_tip1=1&id_tip2=9&id_tip3=2).  Measures are still ongoing with undetermined end date. The population trend is slightly decreasing.


IDmeasures: 11_0_management
IDspecies: 11
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2009-04-01
endDate: 2023-10-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfo:
The species has been eradicated on 16 locations, on 7 locations measures are still ongoing with undetermined end date. Further monitoring is necessary and will be provided.
https://www.tujerodne-vrste.info/2019/03/01/stroski-obvladovanja-orjaskega-dezena/ , http://www.mop.gov.si/fileadmin/mop.gov.si/pageuploads/podrocja/invazivke/Orjaski_dezen_2018.pdf, http://www.mop.gov.si/fileadmin/mop.gov.si/pageuploads/podrocja/invazivke/orjaski_dezen_kratko_porocilo_2017.pdf


IDmeasures: 16_0_management
IDspecies: 16
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
effectiveness: stable
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018-05-01
endDate: 2024-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfo:
Management took place in two locations in Triglav National Park in 2018. Further actions in additional locations in Triglav National park are planed in 2019. An inventory of the species was made in 2018 in Landscape Park Ljubljansko Barje (http://www.ljubljanskobarje.si/uploads/datoteke/Popis%20%C5%BElezave%20nedotike%20in%20velikega%20pajesna%20-%20kon%C4%8Dno%20poro%C4%8Dilo.pdf). Management took place also in Landscape Park Goričko in 2018 on the area of 2,4 ha. 


IDmeasures: 24_0_management
IDspecies: 24
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
effectiveness: increasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Slovenia
startDate: 2011-01-01
endDate: 2020-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfo:
Management of coypu is integrated in regular wildlife management in Slovenia. In current long-term wildlife management plans (2011-2020; thus starting and end date in the Measure(s) section) total reduction of the species is foreseen as a primary management goal. Hunting is allowed all year round without any limitations regarding hunting quotas. Use of traps is also legally alowed for this species. In the reporting period (2015-2018) 1541 animals were culled in Slovenia.


IDmeasures: 28_0_management
IDspecies: 28
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Slovenia
startDate: 2011-01-01
endDate: 2020-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfo:
Management of muskart is integrated in regular wildlife management in Slovenia. In current long-term wildlife management plans (2011-2020; thus starting and end date in the Measure(s) section) prevention of spatial spread and population reduction is foreseen as a primary management goal for muskart. Hunting is allowed all year round without any limitations regarding hunting quotas. Use of traps is also legally alowed for this species.  In the reporting period (2015-2018) 114 animals were culled in Slovenia.
Population decrease is most likely not only due to population control measures, but also a consequence of unknow disease or other unknown reasons.


IDmeasures: 29_0_management
IDspecies: 29
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2017-06-01
endDate: 2026-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfo:
In Slovenia, freshwater indigenous species of crayfish are considered as fishing resources and are consequently a subject of fisheries management. The measures that are currently listed for implementation through Fisheries Management are: 
- unlimited catch (number of specimens) of the species in the areas where the species is present;
- no time and measurment limitiation for fishing (catchment) of the species;
 - the species is allowed to be fished throughout the year and at all sizes/ages.

These measures are long term and will be continuously implemented with the adoption of Fisheries Managament plans; their adoption is forseen by the end of 2019 and will have a 6 year cycle. Even though the plans are not adopted yet, the listed measures are included in the adopted long - term National Fisheries plan (till 2021) that is tha basis for Fisheries Management plans. Untill the adoption of more detailed plans these measures are a recommendation and already partly in implementation. Since the plans are not adopted yet, the ending date for the measures is listed as "till the end of 2021" (end period of long - term adopted National Fisheris Programme), but in practice the fisheries management measures will be without time limitation (no end date).
In 2017 a raising awarness action with Fishing clubs was performed in the framework of the project LIFE for LASCA (LIFE 16/NAT/SI/000644), with the goal of raising awarness regarding problematics of invasive alien species.
Besides the fisheries management measures mentioned above, the implementation of measures for controling the population of Orconectes limosus in the location of established naturalized population started in 2017. In this year different catchment methods were tested. With different methods tested, more comprehensive elimination with the combination of electrofishing, manual catching and the use of crayfish traps started in 2018. Since more intensive elimination of crayfish started in the season of 2018 there are no data on trend of population available yet. In 2017 and 2018, 1925 specimes were removed. In 2019, a LIFE Integrated project  NATURA.SI (LIFE17 IPE/SI/000011) started, which envolves the action of removal of specimens of the species  with the aim of controling the spread of the species in nearby Natura 2000 area with stone crayfish (Austropotamobius torrentium) as quallifying species. The project will end in december 2026. 


IDmeasures: 46_2_management
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #3
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2024-12-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfo:
The actions have taken place in Landscape Sečoveljske Soline and Škocjanski zatok Nature Reserve. One specimen of Trachemys scripta has been removed from the nature in Sečoveljske Soline in 2018. Management measures for Trachemys scripta in the Škocjanski Zatok Nature Reserve have taken place since 2015 and 45 specimens has been caught and removed from the nature since 2015. Management plan for further actions in the Škocjanski Zatok Nature Reserve has been prepared in 2018. Measures are still ongoing with undetermined end date.


IDmeasures: 2_0_eradication
IDspecies: 2
IDreport: DK-2015-2018
country: DK
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018-01-01
endDate: 2019-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/dk/eu/ias/envxl8tna
addInfo:
The species was part of an eradication project, but not found at the location. The population will be sought after again in 2019. 


IDmeasures: 4_0_eradication
IDspecies: 4
IDreport: DK-2015-2018
country: DK
effectiveness: unclear
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1 Hedeland
startDate: 2019-01-01
endDate: 2021-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/dk/eu/ias/envxl8tna
addInfo:
Measure is ongoing. An attempt on eradication by blocking sunligt for the plants will start summer 2019 and the population will be under surveillance over the next few years. Impact on other organisms is unknown at the moment. 


IDmeasures: 32_0_management
IDspecies: 32
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-01-01
endDate: 2021-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfo:
In Slovenia, freshwater indigenous species of crayfish are considered as fishing resources and are consequently a subject of fisheries management. The measures that are currently listed for implementation through Fisheries Management are: 
- unlimited catch (number of specimens) of the species in the areas where the species is present;
- no time and measurment limitiation for fishing (catchment) of the species - the species is allowed to be fished throughout the year and at all sizes/ages;
-  the species is allowed to be fished throughout the year and at all sizes/ages.
These measures are long term and will be continuously implemented (no end date limitation) with the adoption of Fisheries Managament plans; their adoption is forseen by the end of 2019 and will have a 6 year cycle. Even though the plans are not adopted yet, the listed measures are included in the adopted long - term National Fisheries plan (till 2021) that is the basis for Fisheries Management plans. Untill the adoption of more detailed plans these measures are a recommendation and already partly in implementation. Since the plans are not adopted yet, an end date of the measures is listed as "till the end of 2021" (end period of long - term adopted National Fisheris Programme), but in practice the fisheries management measures will be without time limitation (no end date).

In 2017, a raising awarness action with the Fishing clubs was performed in the framework of the project LIFE for LASCA (LIFE 16/NAT/SI/000644), with the goal of raising awarness regarding problematics of invasive alien species.


IDmeasures: 37_0_eradication
IDspecies: 37
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
effectiveness: unclear
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018-06-03
endDate: 2018-10-09
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfo:
Implemented rapid eradication measures regarding the release of Procambarus clarkii on Lopata gas station:
- performance of intervention catch with electrofishing, manual checking and placing crayfish traps;
- placement of iron nets on the outflows of the draining pond at the end of the parking lot and on all the outlets of the drainage system;
- open drainage trenches covered with grass around the gas station were cut down  in order to improve visibility;
- immediate placement of crayfish traps inside the draining pond with the aim of elimination of possibly present individuals of P.clarkii;
- implementation of high electric shocks (600 V, 20 A) with the goal to destroy possibly present individuals inside the pond;
- placement of the nets around the pond to prevent possible migrations of crayfish from the pond to surrounding area on land;
- implementation of high temeprature steaming of the drainage system underneath the parking lot of the gas station with the goal to destroy posibbly present individuals in the pipes;
- examination of drainage system pipes with pipe robot camera;
- establishment of monitoring of the surrounding watercourses and wet areas;
- implementation of e-DNA monitoring of the selected areas in Slovenia for the species.


IDmeasures: 11_0_management
IDspecies: 11
IDreport: DK-2015-2018
country: DK
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1 Municipalities
startDate: 2018-01-01
endDate: 2028-01-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/dk/eu/ias/envxl8tna
addInfo:
Municipalities in Denmark has actionsplan against the giant hogweed. In 2017 a new law was passed which allows municipalities to eradicate giant hog weed on private land and send the bill to owner. The national eradication does not have an end date.


IDmeasures: 40_0_management
IDspecies: 40
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
effectiveness: unclear
objective: containment
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2016-01-01
endDate: 2021-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfo:
Management measures for Pseudorasbora parva so far derive from national legislation (Nature Conservation legislation, Freshwater Fisheries legislation). These measures are:
- ban of settlement of indigenous species;
- ban of breeding of invasive alien species;
- ban of transfering fish species between river basins;
- allowed catchment of invasive alien fish species of all sizes (no minimum size limitations) through the whole year (no time limitations);
- ban of stocking invasive alien fish species.
In 2015 The National Programme of fish management  for 12 year period was adopted. The Programme includes goals and measures also for invasive fish species. Additional measures deriving from this  Programme are:
- establishment of more strict control with stocking of non salmonid fish from polyculture ponds;
- unlimited catchment of invasive alien fish species (no limitiations in number if caught fish per day);
- mandatory catchment of invasive fish species during fishing;
- more strict control of cyprinid fish farms;
- elimination of invasive alien fish species during sport fishing, fishing events (competitions), when performing intervent catchments (managers of fisheries districts - fishing clubs), when performing ichtyological samplings (proffesional institutions , researchers). 
Measures listed above will be determined in more detailed Fisheries management plans. These measures are long term and will be continuously implemented (no end date limitation) with the adoption of Fisheries Managament plans; their adoption is forseen by the end of 2019 and will have a 6 year cycle. Even though the plans are not adopted yet, the listed measures are included in the adopted long - term National Fisheries plan (till 2021) that is the basis for Fisheries Management plans. Untill the adoption of more detailed plans these measures are a recommendation and already partly in implementation. Since the plans are not adopted yet, an end date for the measures "till the end of 2021" is listed (end period of long - term adopted National Fisheris Programme), but in practice the fisheries management measures will be without time limitation (no end date).

 In 2017, a raising awarness action with the FIshing Clubs in the framework of the project LIFE for LASCA (LIFE 16/NAT/SI/000644) was performed, with the goal of raising awarness regarding problematics of invasive alien species.


IDmeasures: 41_0_eradication
IDspecies: 41
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
effectiveness: decreasing
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018-12-01
endDate: 2020-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfo:
Near Strunjan, one plant has been observed in a dense foliage cover near the road. Plant has been present in the area at least since 2013 as it can be seen on the Google street view which has been recorded in the year 2013. Eradication of the kudzu plant took place on 12.12.2018. Kudzu at the location near Dekani has covered the area of 1500 square metres. Eradication of the species took place in December 2018. Monitoring of the site will continue in the 2019 to see if the removal method was successful. 


IDmeasures: 46_0_management
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018-09-01
endDate: 2021-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfo:
The action has taken place in Vipavska dolina - accumulation Vogršček and Renski okljuki. 52 specimens of Trachemys scripta has been removed from the nature in 2018 and euthanized by the vet. The action is a part of the project VIPava (co-financed by the EU and The Republic of Slovenia). Measures are still ongoing with undetermined end date.


IDmeasures: 46_1_management
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #2
startDate: 2018-03-01
endDate: 2021-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfo:
The action has taken place in Landscape Ljubljansko Barje. 11 specimens of Trachemys scripta has been removed from the nature in 2018 and euthanized by the vet. The action is a part of the project PoLJUBA (co-financed by the EU and The Republic of Slovenia). Measures are still ongoing with undetermined end date.


IDmeasures: 32_0_management
IDspecies: 32
IDreport: DK-2015-2018
country: DK
effectiveness: unclear
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2018-08-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/dk/eu/ias/envxl8tna
addInfo:
Temporary commercial use of signal crayfish was allowed in 2018 under restrictions for both the fisher and the buyer of signal crayfish. Only one person used the formulas for selling signal crayfish. The scheme has been evaluated and will continue from 2019 to 2021 under different control measures.


IDmeasures: 38_0_eradication
IDspecies: 38
IDreport: DK-2015-2018
country: DK
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2019-01-01
endDate: 2019-11-01
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/dk/eu/ias/envxl8tna
addInfo:
2 marble crayfish was caught. More marble cray fish has since been extensively sought after and not found. The river will be under surveillance over the summer. 


IDmeasures: 8_0_management
IDspecies: 8
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Lough Arrow
startDate: 2018-09-01
endDate: 2020-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfo:
Mangament measures delpoyed on Lough Arrow under the CANN INterreg project: http://www.newrymournedown.org/the-cann-project. 
Control measures delpoyed are use of jute matting to act as a physcial barrier to growth of Elodea nuttallii. Approximatley a 3,500 meters squared area is under control. It is too early yet in the control programme to determine the population trend.
Biosecurity training to prevent further introduction and spread has been delivered to Lough Arrow stakeholders. 
Management measures are ongoing with an undetermined end date.


IDmeasures: 10_0_management
IDspecies: 10
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: National Roads Invasive Alien Plants Project
startDate: 2016-06-01
endDate: 2022-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfo:
Information on impacted non-target species if there are any has not been collated yet.
The Invasive Alien Plants Project, a joint initiative between Transport Infrastructure Ireland and the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport (DTAS) is a 5.5 million Euro project aimed at eradicating invasive Gunnera tinctoria and other invasive plants on the national road network and where they intersect with regional roads.  For treatment contractors, whether ‘eradication’ of Japanese and other knotweed species and Gunnera tinctoria has been achieved will be determined after the growing season in the fourth year has finished.
The project is implemented in a phased basis and on a regional scale. Local Authorities can draw down on the funds through a framework of competitive tendering for call-off contracts. 
The end date given is indicative of the end date of the final phase but this is not confirmed. 


IDmeasures: 16_0_management
IDspecies: 16
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
effectiveness: eradicated
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Allow Catchment
startDate: 2011-06-01
endDate: 2015-06-30
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfo:
Eradication measures were carried out as part of the DuhallowLIFE (SAMOK) project on the Allow catchment incorporating the tributaries of the Dalua, Rampart and Brogeen.
Approximately 7,500 meters square of Impatiens glandulifera was successfully eradicated from 5 kilometers of riaprian habitat.
The cost of eradication including personnel, travel & subsistence and consumables was 130,523 Euro.
 A full technical report on the removal and monitoring of Impatiems glandulifera from the Allow catchment is available from: https://www.duhallowlife.com/ird-duhallow-life/himalayan-balsam-report-final


IDmeasures: 16_1_management
IDspecies: 16
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Blackwater Catchment (Munster)
startDate: 2015-02-28
endDate: 2021-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfo:
Eradication measures apply to the Blackwater Catchment (Munster)- incorporating the Upper Blackwater from source, downstream as far as confluence with Owentaraglin.
End date for eradication measures are undetermined.
Eradication measures are by hand-pulling of the plants.
Funding of this work is from a RAPTORLIFE project covering both the Blackwater catchment and the Owentaraglin catchment with total cost for Impatiens glandulifera control to date being €338,048. As the level of infestation and input into control is approximately equal for both catchements, a cost of €169,024 cost of eradication including personnel, travel & subsistence and consumables to date is given for this site.
Further information on the RAPTORLIFE project is available from: https://www.duhallowlife.com/raptor-life/about-raptor-life-project


IDmeasures: 42_0_management
IDspecies: 42
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: National overview
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2030-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfo:
Sciurus carolinensis was widespread and abundant and under management measures prior to 2015. Various managment measures are in place for different populations across Ireland. Reporting on the measures on a site/population basis was not feasible for this reporting period but overview details at the national level are given. There is an undetermined end date for management measures at the national scale.
Between 2015 and 2018 population control measures have taken place. A combination of measures have been used including shooting, and trapping and shooting/cervical dislocation. These measures would have been inplemented by Forest owners, Local Authorities and the National Association of Regional Games Council. Anecdotally, it is also reported that some private property owners have employed the services of pest control companies to remove Sciurus carolinensis from their gardens. 


IDmeasures: 46_0_eradication
IDspecies: 46
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
effectiveness: eradicated
type: eradication
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: T. s. subsp troosti
startDate: 2016-02-23
endDate: 2016-02-23
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfo:
The animal was removed form the site by hand and placed in captivity with a rescue centre by the recorder. 


IDmeasures: 11_0_management
IDspecies: 11
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfo:
Mimo spadku liczebności gatunku w miejscach zwalczania to w skali całego kraju jego populacja rośnie. Występuje we wszystkich regionach Polski, obserwowany na ponad 100 stanowiskach liczących więcej niż 100 osobników. W przeciągu ostatnich 20 lat stwierdzono wiele nowych stanowisk gatunku, możliwe, że nadal nie jest odróżniany od pokrewnego barszczu Sosnowskiego (Heracleum sosnowskyi). W skali lokalnej, gatunek zwiększa zasięg populacji przez tworzenie dużej liczby młodych osobników i zasobnego banku nasion. Po przedostaniu się na tereny nadrzeczne, rozszerza potencjalny zasięg inwazji na całą dolinę w dół rzeki. W okresie wysiewu nasion, występowanie silnych wiatrów może przyczynić się do powstania spontanicznych stanowisk gatunku w promieniu wielu kilometrów.


IDmeasures: 13_0_management
IDspecies: 13
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfo:
Mimo spadku liczebności gatunku w miejscach zwalczania to w skali całego kraju jego populacja rośnie. Występuje we wszystkich regionach Polski, obserwowany na ponad 100 stanowiskach liczących więcej niż 100 osobników. W przeciągu ostatnich 20 lat stwierdzono wiele nowych stanowisk gatunku, możliwe, że nadal nie jest odróżniany od pokrewnego barszczu Mantegazziego (Heracleum mantegazzianum). W skali lokalnej, gatunek zwiększa zasięg populacji przez tworzenie dużej liczby młodych osobników i zasobnego banku nasion. Po przedostaniu się na tereny nadrzeczne, rozszerza potencjalny zasięg inwazji na całą dolinę w dół rzeki. W okresie wysiewu nasion, występowanie silnych wiatrów może przyczynić się do powstania spontanicznych stanowisk gatunku w promieniu wielu kilometrów.


IDmeasures: 13_15_management
IDspecies: 13
IDreport: LV-2015-2018
country: LV
effectiveness: stable
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #16 Latvijas valsts ceļi
startDate: 2007-06-10
endDate: 2027-10-30
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lv/eu/ias/envxhoog
addInfo:
Land owner- The Latvian State Roads. Eradication measures ~255 ha 
Eradication methods used: other- combined 
Eradication will be applied until full eradication


IDmeasures: 13_16_management
IDspecies: 13
IDreport: LV-2015-2018
country: LV
effectiveness: unclear
objective: eradication
type: management
noNegativeImpact: false
populationName: Population #17
startDate: 2008-05-02
endDate: 2030-10-30
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lv/eu/ias/envxhoog
addInfo:
Eradication methods used: other- combined 
Eradication will be applied until full eradication
Land owner ir responsible for implementation of eradiction measures, municapalities for control and coordination if land owner is not implementing eradiction measures, State Plant Protection Service for overall managment and monitoring. System to collect and acumulate information on implemented management measures is not established therefore information is given only about some teritories (Population 1.-16.).


IDmeasures: 16_0_management
IDspecies: 16
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
effectiveness: decreasing
objective: control
type: management
noNegativeImpact: true
populationName: Population #1
startDate: 2015-01-01
endDate: 2018-12-31
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfo:
W Polsce działania ograniczające populacje gatunku podejmowano w parkach krajobrazowych – np. w Zespole Nadmorskich Parków Krajobrazowych oraz w rejonie lub w samych parkach narodowych – Biebrzańskim, Kampinoskim, Karkonoskim i Wigierskim. Przy czym w ostatnim z wymienionych parków działania przeprowadzono na największą skalę w ramach projektu finansowanego ze środków Life. Zwalczanie realizowano bez użycia środków chemicznych – wyrywając rośliny kilka razy w roku, a w miejscach gdzie wyrywanie mogło naruszyć spójność gleby i doprowadzić do erozji, stosowano koszenie. Zabiegi przeprowadzano w różnych stadiach rozwojowych roślin, przed okresem zakwitania osobników gatunku i zawiązywania przez nie owoców. Wyrwane okazy lub ścięte części roślin usuwano poza miejsca ich występowania. Pozyskiwaną w ten sposób biomasę utylizowano w specjalnie przygotowanych miejscach kompostowania, zaopatrzonych w betonowe płyty. Uzyskane efekty są bardzo zadowalające – dla przykładu w rejonie miejscowości Sobolewo udało się całkowicie zlikwidować populację niecierpka gruczołowatego w dolinie Czarnej Hańczy. W celu zapewnienia trwałości efektów przeprowadzonych działań, poprzez zabezpieczenie tego terenu przed ponownym napływem nasion, podjęto starania na rzecz eliminacji gatunku z miejsc znajdujących się powyżej odcinka, na którym wykonano zabiegi. 

Mimo spadku liczebności gatunku w miejscach zwalczania to w skali całego kraju jego populacja rośnie. Na podstawie studiów, w których porównywano sytuację gatunku na przestrzeni kilkudziesięciu lat, przeprowadzonych dla polskiej części Karpat i ich przedpola, można stwierdzić, że w ostatnich latach niecierpek gruczołowaty wykazywał duże tempo zajmowania nowych stanowisk i zwiększania zajmowanego areału. Do podobnych wniosków można dojść, analizując obecną sytuację tego gatunku na obszarach niezajętych lub zajętych tylko w niewielkim stopniu w drugiej połowie XX w., do których należy Polska północno-wschodnia, czy też obszar Pomorza Zachodniego. Ogólnie ocenia się, że w ciągu ostatnich 20 lat liczba zajętych dotychczas stanowisk lub/i powierzchni zwartego zasięgu populacji lub/i liczebności populacji lub/i stwierdzeń osobników zwiększyła co najmniej o 1/3.


# eu_species

IDspecies: 35
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R11034
commonNameNational: trawianka
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Okoliczności pojawiania się trawianki w Polsce są nieznane. Gatunek przypuszczalnie został zawleczony z materiałem zarybieniowym azjatyckich ryb karpiowatych, choć nie można wykluczyć wypuszczenia przez akwarystów.
Gatunek szeroko rozprzestrzeniony o wysokim tempie wzrostu populacji. Wciągu ostatnich 20 lat, od czasu pierwszego stwierdzenia w 1993 r. zdołał zasiedlić wiele stanowisk w Wiśle (od ujścia do okolic Krakowa), a ponadto jej dopływach (np. w Bugu, Pilicy, Bzurze), obecny jest w wielu starorzeczach, stawach hodowlanych. Ostatnio stwierdzono również jego obecność w dorzeczu Odry – w dopływie Warty. Uznaje się zatem, że jest to gatunek silnie ekspansywny.

addInfoInspections:
Kontrola na podstawie analizy sprawozdania z realizacji zezwolenia. Zgodnie ze sprawozdaniem z 29.01.2018 od 15 osobników trawianki uzyskano 50 szt. narybku. Zgodnie ze sprawozdaniem z 14.01.2019 w 2018 r. pozyskano 10 osobników trawianki i uzyskano 150 larw trawianki.

addInfoPermits:
Zezwolenie na rozmnażanie i przetrzymywanie osobników w celu prowadzenia badań naukowych nad biologią rozrodu obcych inwazyjnych gatunków ryb, bytujących w środkowym biegu Wisły oraz ocenie ich wpływu na współbytujące taksony rodzime. Ryby objęte zezwoleniem zostały odłowione ze środowiska naturalnego.


IDspecies: 37
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R12250
commonNameNational: rak luizjański
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Jedyny znany przypadek stwierdzenia tego gatunku w naturze dotyczy rzeki Samicy w Wielkopolsce, gdzie w 2014 r. odłowiono jednego osobnika tego gatunku. Nie ma jednak przesłanek, aby odbywał tam rozród, a autor obserwacji przypisuje ją raczej jednorazowemu wypuszczeniu z akwarium (w tym samym czasie odłowił tam australijski gatunek raka Cherax quadricarinatus). Nie są obecnie dostępne inne dane na temat występowania tego gatunku w Polsce. Brak obecnie przesłanek, że gatunek w Polsce tworzy populacje. 


IDspecies: 38
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R17660
commonNameNational: rak marmurkowy
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Gatunek stwierdzono w środowisku przyrodniczym w Polsce dwukrotnie - w 2009 i 2010 r. Oba stwierdzenia miały miejsce w Szczecinie. Zaobserwowane osobniki pochodziły najprawdopodobniej z hodowli akwariowej, a ich obecność w wodzie mogła wynikać z wypuszczenia raków z akwarium. 


IDspecies: 39
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R12260
commonNameNational: szop pracz
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Gatunek został celowo sprowadzony do Europy i wprowadzony poza zasięg naturalnego występowania. Introdukcje miały miejsce w latach 30. ubiegłego wieku, zarówno na zachód, jak i na wschód od granic Polski: w Niemczech i Rosji. Z tych rejonów gatunek zaczął rozszerzać areał występowania i kolonizować nowe tereny. Większość introdukcji szopa pracza we wschodniej Europie zakończyła się niepowodzeniem. W zachodniej i środkowej części kontynentu szop utworzył jednak dziko żyjącą populację, adaptował się do warunków europejskich, a tempo ekspansji wzrosło na przestrzeni ostatnich 30 lat. Szop występuje w Polsce od początku lat 90. XX wieku. Ciągły zasięg występowania szopa ograniczony jest przede wszystkim do zachodniej części kraju (województwa: lubuskie, zachodniopomorskie i dolnośląskie), ekspansja na pozostałą cześć Polski przebiega stosunkowo wolno. Szopy kolonizują również pozostałą cześć Polski, w tempie 80-100 km/5 lat. W centralnej i wschodniej Polsce sporadycznie stwierdzano występowanie szopa w różnych miejscach Polski, co może wskazywać, że szopy skolonizowały już prawie cały obszar kraju, jednak w tych rejonach zasięg występowania szopów nie jest ciągły. 


IDspecies: 40
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R12451
commonNameNational: czebaczek amurski
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Czebaczek amurski jest gatunkiem notowanym niemal na całym obszarze Polski. Nie stwierdzono jego występowania jedynie w północnych rejonach kraju. Rozprzestrzenianie się czebaczka amurskiego w Polsce odbywa się głównie przy udziale człowieka. Stanowiska, na których stwierdzany jest ten gatunek to przede wszystkim stawy hodowlane oraz związane z nimi rzeki. 
Czebaczek amurski został zawleczony przez człowieka do Polski wraz z importowanym z Węgier materiałem zarybieniowym azjatyckich ryb roślinożernych, głównie tołpygi pstrej (Aristichthys nobilis) i tołpygi białej (Hypophathalmichthys molitrix). Po raz pierwszy zauważono go w październiku 1990 roku podczas opróżniania stawu hodowlanego w ośrodku hodowli ryb Stawno nieopodal Milicza. Wiek odłowionych osobników wskazywał, że czebaczek amurski był tam obecny prawdopodobnie od 1987 roku. Od tego czasu w szybkim tempie przybywało stanowisk, na których stwierdzany był ten gatunek w Polsce. Liczba kolejnych stwierdzeń przedstawia się następująco: do 1993 roku – 10; do 1996 roku – 14; do 1999 roku – 27; do 2002 roku – 38; do 2005 roku – 43; do 2008 roku – 51. Obecnie gatunek ten jest szeroko rozprzestrzeniony w naszym kraju, głównie w środkowych i nizinnych regionach, gdzie zasiedla stawy hodowlane, drobne zbiorniki, jeziora oraz rzeki – w tym również małe cieki i rowy melioracyjne. Jego ekspansji sprzyja połączenie kanałami systemów rzecznych. Sprzyjają temu również wędkarze, bowiem czebaczek amurski bywa stosowany jako żywa przynęta do połowu ryb drapieżnych. Szybką ekspansję umożliwiają temu gatunkowi niewielkie rozmiary ciała, duże zdolności adaptacyjne, krótki cykl życiowy, zasiedlanie ukrytych miejsc (wśród roślinności), zdolność do rozrodu na różnych substratach, wielomiotowość, sprawowanie opieki nad złożoną ikrą.


IDspecies: 45
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R15136
commonNameNational: ibis czczony
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Ibisy czczone były sporadycznie obserwowane na terenie Polski (ok. 8 znanych stwierdzeń w latach 1993-2010: w 1993 r. – 1 obserwacja; 2001 r. – 3 obserwacje; 2006 r. – 1 obserwacja; 2009 r. – co najmniej 8 obserwacji najprawdopodobniej tych samych 2 osobników, później jednego z nich; 2010 r. – 2 obserwacje). Obserwowano najczęściej pojedyncze osobniki, jedynie w 2009 r. obserwacje dotyczyły 2 osobników. Ibisy czczone były obserwowane na terenie województwa łódzkiego, w powiatach: łódzkim wschodnim i sieradzkim; województwa małopolskiego, w powiatach: miechowskim i oświęcimskim; województwa pomorskiego, w powiatach: bytowskim i mieście Słupsk; województwa wielkopolskiego, w powiatach: kolskim, ostrowskim i tureckim. Komisja Faunistyczna Sekcji Ornitologicznej Polskiego Towarzystwa Zoologicznego klasyfikuje gatunek jako nie należący do awifauny krajowej, zaliczany do kategorii E (gatunki pochodzące z niewoli, a także zawleczone lub introdukowane, które nie utworzyły samodzielnie utrzymujących się populacji; pojaw nienaturalny). Ibis czczony nie rozmnaża się w Polsce.


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R18154
commonNameNational: żółw ozdobny
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Gatunek o ograniczonym zasięgu występowania w Polsce, nie tworzy w naszym kraju stabilnych populacji. Na większości stanowisk występują pojedyncze osobniki, rzadziej grupy liczące kilka żółwi. Rozprzestrzenienie gatunku jest wynikiem licznych introdukcji prowadzonych przez człowieka, a nie jego spontanicznej inwazji. Obecnie żółwie ozdobne stwierdzane są w zbiornikach i ciekach wodnych niemal w całej Polsce, z wyjątkiem północno-wschodniej części kraju. W bazie danych o występowaniu obcych gatunków żółwi w Polsce, prowadzonej przez PTOP „Salamandra”, żółwie ozdobne zgłoszono co najmniej z 313 miejsc. Najczęściej zgłaszanym podgatunkiem jest żółw czerwonolicy, którego obserwowano w 282 miejscach, następnie żółw żółtolicy, obserwowany w 28 miejscach i najrzadziej spotykany żółw żółtobrzuchy stwierdzony w 3 miejscach. Żółwie uwalniane są przede wszystkim do zbiorników wodnych położonych w miastach i do miejskich odcinków rzek. Nie brak jest jednak stwierdzeń w siedliskach naturalnych. Gatunek ten został stwierdzony co najmniej w 8 parkach narodowych (Wolińskim, PN Ujście Warty, Drawieńskim, Wielkopolskim, PN Gór Stołowych, Kampinoskim, Ojcowskim i Poleskim), a także w co najmniej 14 parkach krajobrazowych (Kaszubskim, Drawskim, Krzesińskim, Mazowieckim, Wdzydzkim, Trójmiejskim, Stobrawskim, Łagowskim, Gryżyńskim, Pszczewskim, Przemęckim, Gostynińsko-Włocławskim oraz PK Łuk Mużakowa i PK Pogórza Przemyskiego).
Brak jest danych na temat rozmnażania się gatunku w Polsce. Z półotwartych hodowli znanych jest jednak kilkanaście przypadków składania przez samicę żółwia czerwonolicego jaj, z których nie wylęgły się jednak młode.


IDspecies: 47
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R15970
commonNameNational: no common name
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Jak dotąd brak jakichkolwiek stwierdzeń szerszenia azjatyckiego w środowisku przyrodniczym Polski, a najbliższe znane stanowiska znajdują się w odległości ok. 500 km od granic naszego kraju, w południowo-zachodnich Niemczech.


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: LV-2015-2018
country: LV
EASINCode: R18154
commonNameNational: sarkanausu bruņurupucis
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lv/eu/ias/envxhoog
addInfoSpecies:
Individuals are found in the whole territory of Latvia, but there is no information about reproduction in nature. In captivity in Latgales zoo eggs were laid. In nature mostly single individuals are found. Main reason why T.Scripta numbers in nature increase is pet release to nature. Also, subspecies (T. scripa scripta), which can breed with other subspecies (T.scripta elegans) and form hybrids are found.


IDspecies: 0
IDreport: CY-2015-2018
country: CY
EASINCode: R00644
commonNameNational: Αιγυπτιακή χήνα; Φοινικόσιηνα
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/cy/eu/ias/envxl7o6g
addInfoSpecies:
1 bird record in 2014 in a wetland (reservoir). No records after 2015 during monthly wetland bird monitoring. A small number of birds kept in contained conditions in a zoo.


IDspecies: 34
IDreport: CY-2015-2018
country: CY
EASINCode: R03000
commonNameNational: Πενισέτο
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: unclear
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/cy/eu/ias/envxl7o6g
addInfoSpecies:
1. INFORMATION ON DISTRIBUTION. Previous reports referred to recordings of species Cenchrus purpureus, Pennisetum setaceum or Pennisetum advena (=P.setaceum var. "Rubrum"). The survey carried out in Cyprus between November 2018 - May 2019 confirmed the presence of P. setaceum (identified by national experts). Based on our observations the species is found in disturbed sites (roadsides, sidewalks, or near houses). There is evidence for its presence in only 2 natural sites. The distribution map is attached in the relevant section of the report.
2. INFORMATION ON BIOLOGY/ECOLOGY. The fact that our observations recorded plants of multiple age classes indicates that reproduction occurs in Cyprus. No studies have been undertaken to determine the reproduction patterns of the species, although it is presumed that it reproduces both sexually and asexually according to our observations.
3. INFORMATION ON MANAGEMENT: A management plan was developed for the species in the end of 2018 which will be the basis for application of management measures.


IDspecies: 37
IDreport: CY-2015-2018
country: CY
EASINCode: R12250
commonNameNational: Αμερικανική Καραβίδα του γλυκού νερού; Βαλτογαρίδα
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/cy/eu/ias/envxl7o6g
addInfoSpecies:
1. INFORMATION ON OFFICIAL DETECTION: A total of 9 live specimens of P. clarkii imported from Thailand were confiscated on 26.10.18 at Larnaka BIP by the Veterinary Services and were destroyed by euthanization.
2. INFORMATION ON MANAGEMENT: A management plan was developed for the species in the end of 2017 which will be the basis for application of management measures.
2. iNFORMATION ON IMPACTS: Although no field study has been undertaken to assess the impacts of the species on native species during the reporting period, a laboratory study conducted in 2012 in Cyprus suggested negative impacts of Procambarus clarkii on the only native freshwated crab species Potamon potamios (protected species), through competition for shelter (agressiveness, domination in fights and shelter occupation). The study is published as: Savvides, Pantelis & Louca, Vasilis & Sfenthourakis, Spyros. (2015). Competition for shelter occupancy between a native freshwater crab and an invasive crayfish. Aquatic Ecology. 49. 10.1007/s10452-015-9522-7. 


IDspecies: 39
IDreport: CY-2015-2018
country: CY
EASINCode: R12260
commonNameNational: Ρακούν
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/cy/eu/ias/envxl7o6g
addInfoSpecies:
A number of animals are kept by a zoo in contained conditions, or by private owners but the species is not present in the environment.


IDspecies: 44
IDreport: CY-2015-2018
country: CY
EASINCode: R14882
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/cy/eu/ias/envxl7o6g
addInfoSpecies:
The species was imported in the past via the pet trade industry. It is assumed that a small number of animals are still kept by private owners but there have been no records of the species in the environment.


IDspecies: 45
IDreport: CY-2015-2018
country: CY
EASINCode: R15136
commonNameNational: Ιερή ίβιδα
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/cy/eu/ias/envxl7o6g
addInfoSpecies:
A small number of birds are kept in zoos under containment. The species is not present in the environment.


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: CY-2015-2018
country: CY
EASINCode: R18154
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/cy/eu/ias/envxl7o6g
addInfoSpecies:
INFORMATION ON PRESENCE: The species is established in the environment but is also kept by a zoo in containment and by private owners since it was the predominant turtle pet species imported and traded for years on the island before 2015. 
INFORMATION ON MANAGEMENT: A management plan was developed for the species in the end of 2017 which will be the basis for application of management measures.
INFORMATION ON IMPACTS: Although no ecological studies have been undertaken to assess impacts on native species, it is presumed that it competes with the native Mauremys rivulata in sites where they co-occur.

commonNameNational:
Αμερικανική νεροχελώνα του γλυκού νερού; Νεροχελώνα με τα κόκκινα μάγουλα; Νεροχελώνα με την κίτρινη κοιλιά


IDspecies: 23
IDreport: FR-2015-2018
country: FR
EASINCode: R09640
commonNameNational: Muntjac de Chine
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fr/eu/ias/envxouw3q
addInfoSpecies:
La source d'introduction est un particulier autorisé à en détenir mais dont les conditions de captivité n'ont manifestement pas permis d'empêcher la fuite d'individus depuis de nombreuses années avant leur détection formelle en 2017. Depuis, cette source d'introduction est en voie de résorption par retrait des animaux captifs (parc boisé). 
Pas d'autorisations ni de contrôles d'établissements, du fait de la mise en place de la réglementation nationale en 2018, et d'un démarrage effectif en 2019


IDspecies: 27
IDreport: FR-2015-2018
country: FR
EASINCode: R09857
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fr/eu/ias/envxouw3q
addInfoSpecies:
Espèce présente uniquement dans les parcs zoologiques, absente en nature. Présente à l'état naturel en Guyane française.

commonNameNational:
Quati (Guyane Française);Quatimundé (Guyane Française);Coati brun;Kwasi kwasi (Guyane Française);Coachi;Couasi (Guyane Française);Coati roux;Kwasi kaanu (Guyane Française);Kouachi (Guyane Française);Siyeu (Guyane Française)


IDspecies: 33
IDreport: FR-2015-2018
country: FR
EASINCode: R10890
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fr/eu/ias/envxouw3q
commonNameNational:
Camomille z'oiseaux (La Réunion);Camomie (La Réunion);Grande camomille;Camomille balais (La Réunion);Herbe blanche (La Réunion)


IDspecies: 2
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
EASINCode: R01529
commonNameNational: glejovka americká
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfoSpecies:
Management measures are defined in annex 2a of Decree No. 24/2003 Coll. as as follow: mechanical (small-scale occurrence), chemical (widely spread) and combined (widely spread).


IDspecies: 16
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
EASINCode: R07719
commonNameNational: netýkavka žliazkatá
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfoSpecies:
Management measures are defined in annex 2a of Decree No. 24/2003 Coll. as follow: mechanical (small-scale occurrence), chemical (widely spread) and combined (widely spread).


IDspecies: 24
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
EASINCode: R09720
commonNameNational: nutria vodná/riečna
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfoSpecies:
Originally spread from fur farms. Management measures are defined in annex 2 of Decree No. 24/2003 Coll. as follow: taking in the wild or hunting. Management measures must follow the Act No. 274/2009 Coll. on Hunting.


IDspecies: 29
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
EASINCode: R10443
commonNameNational: rak pruhovaný
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfoSpecies:
Spread of this species may be accompanied by the spread of the pathogen Aphanomyses astaci, which threatens the populations of native crayfish. Management measures are defined in annex 2 of Decree No. 24/2003 Coll. as follow: taking in the wild. Management measures must follow the Act No. 216/2018 on Fisheries.


IDspecies: 31
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
EASINCode: R10652
commonNameNational: potápnica bielolíca
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfoSpecies:
Only one specimen was recorded in 2013 and one in 2015 (both female). Management measures are defined in annex 2 of Decree No. 24/2003 Coll. as follow: taking in the wild.


IDspecies: 35
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
EASINCode: R11034
commonNameNational: býčkovec amurský
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfoSpecies:
Common in the East Slovakia lowland. Has negative impact on Umbra krameri. Management measures are defined in annex 2 of Decree No. 24/2003 Coll. as follow: taking in the wild. Management measures must follow the Act No. 216/2018 on Fisheries.


IDspecies: 38
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
EASINCode: R17660
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfoSpecies:
Spread of this species may be accompanied by the spread of the pathogen Aphanomyses astaci, which threatens the populations of native crayfish. 


IDspecies: 3
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
EASINCode: R01830
commonNameNational: Struikaster [NL]; Baccharis à feuilles d’arroche [FR]; Kreuzstrauch [DE]
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfoSpecies:
d: Although we have no clear numbers, the species may still have planted right after 2015 for erosion control in dune ecosystems


IDspecies: 5
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
EASINCode: R02573
commonNameNational: pallaseekhoorn [NL]; écureuil de Pallas [FR]; Pallas-Schönhörnchen [DE]
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfoSpecies:
1 potential observation in 2016 that was never seen again 
A feral population (zoo escapees) has been eradicated in Dadizele before entry in force of list 1


IDspecies: 16
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
EASINCode: R07719
commonNameNational: reuzenbalsemien [NL]; balsamine de l’Himalaya [FR]; Drüsiges Springkraut [DE]
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfoSpecies:
no evidence of "b", but invasion level in neighboring countries very high; d: beekeepers planting the species in nature around the hives


IDspecies: 18
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
EASINCode: R08679
commonNameNational: Amerikaanse stierkikker [NL]; grenouille taureau [FR]; Amerikanischer Ochsenfrosch [DE]
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfoSpecies:
e: not in trade anymore since a long time so presumably new population is the result of translocation
g: fishstocking

addInfoInspections:
As the research granted by the permit was commissioned by the competent authority itself, compliance with the permit was closely supervised in ways other than inspections.

addInfoPermits:
The permits have been issued for research on the control of bullfrog populations, in light of the Regulation.


IDspecies: 19
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
EASINCode: R17663
commonNameNational: grote waterteunisbloem [NL]; jussie à grandes fleurs [FR]; Großblütiges Heusenkraut [DE]
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfoSpecies:
-Invasion level in neighbouring countries is rather high and the plant is often found along transboundary watercourses and waterbodies; new entries in TO+1 maps probably from spread because : 1) the species was included in the Belgian project Alterias (project with horticulture sector) and thus not sold anymore, and 2) new gridsquares are next to known gridsquares;
-Plant found in transboundary canals and water courses (France), but no direct evidence of entry


IDspecies: 26
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
EASINCode: R09747
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: asexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfoSpecies:
c: new populations were discovered in Nassonge and Floreffe, they were introduced by humans 
I: natural spread seems rather limited hitherto

commonNameNational:
ongelijkbladig vederkruid [NL]; Myriophylle hétérophylle [FR]; Verschiedenblättriges Tausendblatt [DE]


IDspecies: 29
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
EASINCode: R10443
commonNameNational: gevlekte Amerikaanse rivierkreeft [NL]; écrevisse américaine [FR]; Kamberkrebs [DE]
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfoSpecies:
Reason of absence of management: 
The species is widespread in Belgium and present in most watercourses and many private ponds. Given the species is very widespread, and the low feasibility of management, applying control programs (other than actions on pathways) for this species is not considered cost-effective.  Therefore, control actions have therefore not (yet) been undertaken.


IDspecies: 32
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
EASINCode: R10676
commonNameNational: Californische rivierkreeft [NL]; écrevisse signal [FR]; Signalkrebs [DE]
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfoSpecies:
h: aquaculture
Absence of management: 
Relative to other Union list species, P. leniusculus is considered of low priority both in terms of impact and feasibility of control. Control actions have therefore not (yet) been undertaken. It is a widespread species and can be found in rivers and ponds.


IDspecies: 34
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
EASINCode: R03000
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
commonNameNational:
fraai lampenpoetsersgras [NL]; herbe aux écouvillons pourpres [FR]; Afrikanisches Lampenputzergras [DE]


IDspecies: 37
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
EASINCode: R12250
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfoSpecies:
In Wallonia, populations are known in private ponds, but they require specific agreements with the owners. Tests were done to develop traps as other methods of management (such as drainage of the pond) are very intrusive for owners. 

commonNameNational:
rode Amerikaanse rivierkreeft [NL]; écrevisse de Louisiane [FR]; Roter Amerikanischer Sumpfkrebs [DE]


IDspecies: 40
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
EASINCode: R12451
commonNameNational: blauwbandgrondel [NL]; goujon asiatique [FR]; Blaubandbärbling [DE]
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfoSpecies:
Contaminant of fish stocking (c) but no evidence

Justification of no management: 
- The species is widely distributed in watercourses throughout the country.   Relative to other Union list species, P. parva is considered of low priority both in terms of impact and the feasibility of control (there is no cost-effective way to manage the species). Control actions have therefore not (yet) been undertaken.


IDspecies: 26
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
EASINCode: R09747
commonNameNational: Verschiedenblättriges Tausendblatt
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: asexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfoSpecies:
Wirksame Managementmaßnahmen werden aktuell erarbeitet und werden erst nach dem Berichtszeitraum fristgerecht vorliegen.


IDspecies: 44
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R14882
commonNameNational: Iora talún Sibéarach
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
Casual sightings of the species have been reported with no evidence of reproduction. 
In most instances where live animals were reported for during and prior to this reporting period (2015-2018), the species behaviour observed was of not being 'human-shy' indicating that they may be escaped/released pets. Most sightings were also of animals in gardens or on the periphery of woodland areas. 
A rapid response by authorities to remove the animals reported was made but the animals could not be located. There have been no further sighting reports of the animals from these areas with local National Parks and Wildlife Service remaining vigilant to surveillance for the species.

A full detailed risk assessment for this species was undertaken in 2014. The conclusion response for the overall risk of this species in Ireland was MINIMAL with a Medium level of confidence. The full risk assessment can be accessed from: http://nonnativespecies.ie/risk-assessments/  
An online species account with access to an interactive map of verified sightings is available from: https://species.biodiversityireland.ie 


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R18154
commonNameNational: no common name
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
Verified sightings for Trachemys scripta subsp. scripta and one sighting for Trachemys scripta subsp. troosti have been recorded in Ireland during the reporting period (2015-2018). There are also additional records for the species at the genus level Trachemys scripta. No evidence of successful reproduction has been documented for these animals from the wild in Ireland. The animals ecology suggests that Ireland's current climate would not provide the enough of consistently warm days to enable successful incubation of eggs. 
The majority of the sightings are for Trachemys scripta species have been predominantly reported from ponds in public park settings. It is highly suspected that these are pet animals that were intentionally released into these areas. Few sightings are from natural water courses. 
The Trachemys scripta subsp. troosti animal seen on the shores of Lough Ennell in 2016 was was removed from the site and placed with a rescue centre. 


IDspecies: 40
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
EASINCode: R12451
commonNameNational: hrúzovec sieťovaný
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfoSpecies:
Common in the lowlands. Management measures are defined in annex 2 of Decree No. 24/2003 Coll. as follow: taking in the wild. Management measures must follow the Act No. 216/2018 on Fisheries. Have negative impact on native Leucaspius delineatus.


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: SK-2015-2018
country: SK
EASINCode: R18154
commonNameNational: korytnačka písmenková
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/sk/eu/ias/envxo_voq
addInfoSpecies:
Management measures are defined in annex 2 of Decree No. 24/2003 Coll. as follow: taking in the wild. Found specimen must be transported to National ZOO Bojnice. Possession of the species was prohibited under Act no. 15/2005 Coll. on CITES


IDspecies: 0
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R00644
commonNameNational: Ganso del Nilo
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoPermits:
The Government of the Principality of Asturias has issued two permits. The first one has been issued to the Parque Isabela Católica and it started on 2nd November 2011 (one specimen). The other one has been issued to the Zoo NZ-0-34-19 and it started on 11th October 2012  (two specimens). The aim is to house specimens of this species coming from private owners to avoid their release in the environment. 


IDspecies: 7
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R05440
commonNameNational: Jacinto de agua;Camalote
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoSpecies:
In 2004, the only known population in Asturias was eradicated. 
In the Valencian Community the species has been eradicated as well. The mechanical-physical methods used for the control of E. crassipes consisted of hand removal, assisted by manually operated tools (such as pitchforks, rakes or dip nets). The eradication works have lasted for eight years starting in 2007 until 2014, with annual preventive monitoring actions to date. It has been performed in three localities: Castellón marshes, Algar River y Albaida River. 
In Andalusia the species was subject to rapid eradication after early detection (June 2010 to September 2010). The methodology applied was hand removal and the action was carried out two more times to eliminate isolated specimens or small individuals hidden on the banks.


IDspecies: 8
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R05501
commonNameNational: Broza del Canadá;Peste de agua
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoSpecies:
There is not much data. It seems like the species has not yet appeared in Spain although its similarity with Elodea canadensis does not allow to support it. Although it reproduces by seed and vegetatively (by means of stem fragments with the capacity to take root), in Europe it's entirely vegetative as there are no specimens with male flowers.	


IDspecies: 9
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R05836
commonNameNational: Cangrejo chino
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoSpecies:
In Andalusia, the species has been subject to management measures in Seville from 2005 until 2010. The entry pathways have not been controlled and the species is also found along the Guadalquivir estuary, an open area where it is very complicated to apply control measures.


IDspecies: 25
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R18934
commonNameNational: Cola de zorro;Milenrama brasileño
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoSpecies:
Washington State's Department of Ecology (2003) states: "Virtually all M. aquaticum plants are female. Male plants are unknown outside of South America, so no seeds are produced in North American populations. Since M. aquaticum also lacks tubers or other specialized reproductive overwintering structures like turions, it spreads exclusively by plant fragments outside of its native range. Unlike Eurasian watermilfoil, M. aquaticum does not form autofragments. However, fragments can be formed mechanically and will readily root. With its tough rhizomes, M. aquaticum can be transported long distances on boat trailers. Rhizomes stored under moist conditions in a refrigerator survived for one year. (\"http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=401)
Detected in a cattle pond in Extremadura.  Apparently, the species has not been dispersed in five years. 


IDspecies: 26
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R09747
commonNameNational: no common name
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoSpecies:
Myriophyllum heterophyllum spreads primarily via clonal reproduction and fragmentation, seldom forming emergent heterophyllous flower-bearing stems, and does not generate a significant seedbank. Little is known about the reproductive biology of M. heterophyllum but many fertile specimens appear to contain viable seeds. Its stems serve as efficient organs for vegetative reproduction and their draping habit facilitates transport on boat trailers. Winter buds enable M. heterophyllum to overwinter in northern New Hampshire. http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=1700


IDspecies: 27
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R09857
commonNameNational: Tajon;Achuni;Coatí;Caoti
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoPermits:
The Government of the Principality of Asturias has issued one permit. It hs been issued to the Zoological Park ES 330440004362 and it started on 2nd November 2011 (five specimens). The aim is to house specimens of this species coming from private owners to avoid their release in the environment. 


IDspecies: 31
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R10652
commonNameNational: Malvasía canela;Pato tepalcate
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoSpecies:
Subject to rapid eradication by shooting in Andalusia after early detection (from 01/06/1991 to 31/05/2003) 


IDspecies: 45
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R15136
commonNameNational: Ibis sagrado
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoSpecies:
Subject to rapid eradication by shooting in Andalusia after early detection. The species was eradicated from Andalusia in 2010 by shooting. 

addInfoPermits:
The Government of the Principality of Asturias has issued one permit. It has been issued to the Zoological Park NZ-0-51-2 and it started on 2nd November 2011 (two specimens). The aim is to house specimens of this species coming from private owners to avoid their release in the environment.


IDspecies: 25
IDreport: FI-2015-2018
country: FI
EASINCode: R18934
commonNameNational: isoärviä
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fi/eu/ias/envxs8imw
addInfoSpecies:
The species has been sold in aquarium shops before the legislation came into force, thus it is possible that it still exists in some home aquaria in Finland.


IDspecies: 32
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R10676
commonNameNational: Cangrejo de California;Cangrejo señal;Cangrejo del Pacífico
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoSpecies:
It spreads by watercourses.
In Asturias, the species was introduced in 2006 in the Nalón basin. 
In the Region of Murcia was detected for the first time in November 2015 in the Segura river basin. The entry was the result of an intentional or negligent release. An analysis of the situation of the stock of this species was carried out in 2017, as a previous stage to carrying out eradication or control measures. The species was detected for the first time in November 2015 in the Segura river basin.	
In Andalusia, management measures took place in Riofrío (Granada) between 2005 and 2013. The applied methodology was electrofishing, crab traps and artificial islands for shelter (to facilitate the capture in inaccessible areas). Its eradication was considered impossible. Otherwise, effective control has been maintained for years.

addInfoPermits:
The Government of the Principality of Asturias has issued one permit. The permit has been issued to the Zoological Park ES ES330240005673 and it started on 24th June 2016 (two specimens). The aim is to house specimens of this species coming from private owners to avoid their release in the environment. 


IDspecies: 34
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R03000
commonNameNational: Plumero;Pasto de elefante;Rabogato
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoSpecies:
Soil seed bank viable for up to 6 years. The species is able to re-sprout from the roots.
In the Region of Murcia, the species is planted in public and private gardens, source of spreading. The escaped specimens are located mainly on roadsides.


IDspecies: 37
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R12250
commonNameNational: Cangrejo americano;Cangrejo rojo
eradicationMeasures: true
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoSpecies:
Spread by watercourses.
Species introduced in the county in the 60s. The species was introduced in Asturias in 1989 by fishermen.
In the Region of Murcia, studies about location have been carried out and proposals of actions and control have been initiated but no eradication program was undertaken.

addInfoPermits:
The Government of the Principality of Asturias has issued one permit. It has been issued to the Zoological Park ES330240005673 and it started on 24th June 2016 (two specimens). The aim is to house specimens of this species coming from private owners to avoid their release in the environment. 


IDspecies: 39
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R12260
commonNameNational: Mapache;Mapache comn;Mapachín
eradicationMeasures: true
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoSpecies:
In the Valencian Community and Region de Murcia is considered an eradicated species.
A single specimen was captured in Extremadura without detecting more specimens until now.
In Catalonia, nowadays is unknown.

addInfoPermits:
The Government of the Principality of Asturias has issued two permits One of the permits has been issued to the Zoological Park ES 330440004362  and it started on 2nd November 2011 (two specimens). The other one has been issued to the Zoological Park NZ-0-34-19 and it started on 11th October 2012 (one specimen). The aim is to house specimens of this species coming from private owners to avoid their release in the environment. 


IDspecies: 44
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R14882
commonNameNational: Ardilla de Siberia
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoSpecies:
Subject to rapid eradication by shooting in Andalusia after early detection. Species eradicated from Cádiz in 2013. 


IDspecies: 31
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R10652
commonNameNational: Американска тръноопашата потапница
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Nikolov B. 2017. Oxyura jamaicensis Gmelin, 1789. Pp. 118-121. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf 
Nikolov B. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Oxyura jamaicensis Gmelin, 1789 in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 32
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R10676
commonNameNational: Сигнален (калифорнийски) рак
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Todorov M., Trichkova T., Hubenov Z. 2017. Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana, 1852). Pp. 82-85. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Todorov M., Trichkova T., Hubenov Z. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana, 1852) in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 33
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R10890
commonNameNational: Алергизиращ партениум
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Reference:
Владимиров, В., Петрова, А., Георгиев, В., Цонева, С. 2017. Baccharis halimifolia, Parthenium hysterophorus, Persicaria perfoliata, Pueraria montana var. lobata. – В: Тричкова, Т, Владимиров, Вл., Томов, Р., Тодоров, М. (ред.). Атлас на инвазивните чужди видове от значение за Европейския съюз, ИБЕИ-БАН, ESENIAS, София, ISBN:978-954-9746-43-3.


IDspecies: 34
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R03000
commonNameNational: фонтан трева
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: unclear
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
The species is established in one localtion (first recorded in 1987). Most likely it was planted somewhere in the area of establishment for ornamental purposes and consequently escaped and established locally. The species reproduces by vegetative means and very likely also sexually but the latter has not been studied (respectively, proven) yet. Since the species is present by a road with heavy traffic, the grassy stripes along the road are regularly cut and this usually prevents formation of seeds. The latter fact probably explains why the species has not spread widely.


IDspecies: 35
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R11034
commonNameNational: Китайски поспаланко
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Trichkova T., Stefanov T. 2017. Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877. Pp. 98-101. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf


IDspecies: 37
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R12250
commonNameNational: Червен (луизиански) блатен рак
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Trichkova T., Todorov M., Hubenov Z. 2017. Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852). Pp. 86-89. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Trichkova T., Todorov M., Hubenov Z. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 38
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R17660
commonNameNational: Американски мраморен рак
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Trichkova T., Todorov M., Hubenov Z. 2017. Procambarus fallax f. virginalis. Pp. 90-93. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Trichkova T., Todorov M., Hubenov Z. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Procambarus fallax f. virginalis in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 39
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R12260
commonNameNational: Американски енот (миеща мечка)
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Koshev Y., Nedyalkov N. 2017. Procyon lotor Linnaeus, 1758. Pp. 146-149. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Koshev Y., Nedyalkov N. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Procyon lotor Linnaeus, 1758, in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 40
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R12451
commonNameNational: Псевдоразбора
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Stefanov T., Trichkova T. 2017. Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846). Pp. 102-105. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf 
Stefanov T., Trichkova T. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846) in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R18154
commonNameNational: Tortuga pintada
eradicationMeasures: true
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoPermits:
The Government of the Principality of Asturias has issued some permits. The aim of these permits are to house specimens of this species coming from private owners to avoid their release in the environment. The permits are listed below: 
- Zoological Park ES 330440004362, it started on 2nd November 2011 (31 specimens).
- Zoological Park NZ-0-51-2, it started on 2nd November 2011 (30 specimens).
- Zoological Park ES330240005673, it started on 24th June 2016 (10 specimens).
- Zoological Park NZ-0-34-19, it started on 11th October 2012 (100 specimens).
- The Parque Isabela Católica, it started on 2nd November 2011 (150 specimens).
- Zoological Park NZ-0-12-90, it started on 2nd November 2011 (10 specimens).


IDspecies: 47
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R15970
commonNameNational: Avispón asiático, Avispa negra
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoSpecies:
In Asturias, this species is detected for the first time on 31st July 2014, in the San Tirso de Abres council, and it spreads across neighbouring councils. In eastern Asturias, the species is detected for the first time in 2016.
In Extramdura, a living specimen introduced through seasonally mobile apiculture has been detected in a hive.


IDspecies: 26
IDreport: FI-2015-2018
country: FI
EASINCode: R09747
commonNameNational: kampaärviä
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fi/eu/ias/envxs8imw
addInfoSpecies:
The species may have been sold in aquarium shops before the legislation came into force, thus it is possible that it still exists in some home aquaria in Finland.


IDspecies: 34
IDreport: FI-2015-2018
country: FI
EASINCode: R03000
commonNameNational: arabiansulkahirssi
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fi/eu/ias/envxs8imw
addInfoSpecies:
The species has been sold in garden shops before the legislation came into force. The species cannot overwinter in Finland.


IDspecies: 44
IDreport: FI-2015-2018
country: FI
EASINCode: R14882
commonNameNational: siperianmaaorava
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fi/eu/ias/envxs8imw
addInfoSpecies:
The species has been sold in pet shops before the legislation came into force, thus it is possible that it still exists in some homes in Finland.


IDspecies: 2
IDreport: IT-2015-2018
country: IT
EASINCode: R01529
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/it/eu/ias/envxou6uq/
commonNameNational:
Canape della Siria (Toscana);Albero della seta;Pianta dei pappagallini;Asclepiade della Siria;Lino d'India;Titimalo laurifolio (Lombardia);Apocinu majuri (Sicilia);Asclepiade;Cotone egiziano (Toscana);Pianta dei pappagalli


IDspecies: 8
IDreport: IT-2015-2018
country: IT
EASINCode: R05501
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: asexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/it/eu/ias/envxou6uq/
commonNameNational:
Elodea di Nuttall (Italia), Elodea di Nuttall (Italia), Peste d'acqua di Nuttall (Italia);Peste d'acqua comune


IDspecies: 16
IDreport: IT-2015-2018
country: IT
EASINCode: R07719
addInfoSpecies: Still being marketed.
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/it/eu/ias/envxou6uq/
commonNameNational:
Fiori di bach ;Non mi toccare;Impaziente ghiandolosa;Impatiente glanduleuse;Balsamina ghiandolosa;Balsamina


IDspecies: 42
IDreport: IT-2015-2018
country: IT
EASINCode: R13698
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/it/eu/ias/envxou6uq/
commonNameNational:
Scoiattolo grigio;Sciurus carolinensis;Scoiattolo grigio americano;SCOIATTOLO GRIGIO ;Scoiattolo grigio orientale


IDspecies: 44
IDreport: IT-2015-2018
country: IT
EASINCode: R14882
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/it/eu/ias/envxou6uq/
commonNameNational:
Scoiattolo striato giapponese ;Scoiattolo coreano;Tamia siberiano;Tamia siberiano o borunduk;Scoiattolo giapponese


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: IT-2015-2018
country: IT
EASINCode: R18154
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/it/eu/ias/envxou6uq/
commonNameNational:
Tartaruga acquatica americana ;Tartaruga dalle orecchie rosse
;Tartaruga dalle orecchie arancioni di cumberland;Tartaruga dalle orecchie gialle comune ;Tartaruga dalle guance gialle;Tartaruga dalle orecchie gialle minore;Tartaruga palustre americana;Testu


IDspecies: 0
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
EASINCode: R00644
commonNameNational: Nilgans
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfoSpecies:
Wirksame Managementmaßnahmen werden aktuell erarbeitet und werden erst nach dem Berichtszeitraum vorliegen. 


IDspecies: 11
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
EASINCode: R07248
commonNameNational: Riesenbärenklau
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfoSpecies:
Wirksame Managementmaßnahmen werden aktuell erarbeitet und werden erst nach dem Berichtszeitraum vorliegen. 


IDspecies: 15
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
EASINCode: R07537
commonNameNational: Großer Wassernabel
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfoSpecies:
NW: Ist in Fließgewässersystemen am Niederrhein schon länger verbreitet ohne negative Auswirkungen bisher.  Entnahme wäre sehr aufwendig und hat derzeit keine Priorität.


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: FI-2015-2018
country: FI
EASINCode: R18154
commonNameNational: punakorvakilpikonna
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fi/eu/ias/envxs8imw
addInfoSpecies:
The species has been sold in pet shops before the legislation came into force, thus it is possible that it still exists in some homes in Finland.

addInfoPermits:
Permit concerns slider eggs. Link to the permit (In Finnish): https://vieraslajit.fi/sites/default/files/P%C3%A4%C3%A4t%C3%B6s_ESAVI_2017_03_27.pdf#overlay-context=fi/content/tiedostojen-uploadsivu


IDspecies: 0
IDreport: RO-2015-2018
country: RO
EASINCode: R00644
commonNameNational: Gâscă egipteană
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ro/eu/ias/envxaqfxw
addInfoSpecies:
Informații suplimentare despre distribuția speciei vor fi generate prin proiect Managementul adecvat al speciilor invazive din Romania, in conformitate cu Regulamentul UE 1143/2014 referitor la prevenirea si gestionarea introducerii si raspandirii speciilor alogene invazive - Cod SMIS 2014+ 120008.


IDspecies: 2
IDreport: RO-2015-2018
country: RO
EASINCode: R01529
commonNameNational: Ceara albinei
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ro/eu/ias/envxaqfxw
addInfoSpecies:
Informații suplimentare vor fi generate prin proiect Managementul adecvat al speciilor invazive din Romania, in conformitate cu Regulamentul UE 1143/2014 referitor la prevenirea si gestionarea introducerii si raspandirii speciilor alogene invazive - Cod SMIS 2014+ 120008.


IDspecies: 18
IDreport: DE-2015-2018
country: DE
EASINCode: R08679
commonNameNational: Nordamerikanischer Ochsenfrosch
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/de/eu/ias/envxl8hqg
addInfoPermits:
Die Genehmigungen wurden für die Jahre 2017 und 2018 durch das Bundesland Baden-Württemberg erteilt.


IDspecies: 9
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R05836
commonNameNational: apželtkojis krabas
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje pavienių apželtkojo krabo individų nuolat aptinkama Baltijos jūros priekrantėje ir Kuršių mariose, pasitaiko Nemuno žemupyje. Ši rūšis Baltijos jūros Lietuvos priekrantę ir Kuršių marias bei kitas Baltijos jūros rytines dalis pasiekia savaime iš kitų teritorijų, kuriose rūšis įsitvirtinusi. Rytinėse Baltijos jūros pakrantėse rūšis nesidaugina dėl per mažo vandens druskingumo. 
Rūšis turi aiškų polinkį plisti. Dėl nedidelio gausumo apželtkojis krabas Baltijos jūros priekrančių buveinėse aiškaus neigiamo poveikio nedaro.


IDspecies: 10
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R06923
commonNameNational: čilinė gunera
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje šios rūšies augalų gamtoje nebuvo neužregistruota. Esama nepatikrintų duomenų, kad buvo bandoma auginti privačiuose želdynuose. Lietuvoje rūšis galėtų natūralizuotis ir plisti vegetatyviniu būdu, o dauginimasis sėklomis mažai tikėtinas. 


IDspecies: 11
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R07248
commonNameNational: Mantegacio barštis
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Mantegacio barščiai Lietuvoje neužregistruoti, tačiau yra tikimybė, kad jų gali būti, nes aptikti visose kaimyninėse valstybėse, išskyrus Rusijos Kaliningrado sritį. Būtina atlikti išsamius tyrimus, siekiant nustatyti, ar Lietuvoje auga Mantegacio barščiai. Didžiausia tikimybė aptikti Mantegacio barščių Lietuvoje yra pietvakariniuose rajonuose, į kuriuos galėjo paplisti iš Lenkijos ir Baltarusijos. Šios rūšies augalų gali būti aplink miestus ir gyvenvietes, į kurias galėjo būti gyventojų savarankiškai  atvežti XX a. pabaigoje iš kitų Europos šalių.


IDspecies: 12
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R07250
commonNameNational: persinis barštis
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje šios rūšies augalų gamtoje kol kas neužregistruota, nėra patikimų duomenų, kad buvo auginami želdynuose. Lietuvos klimato sąlygos visiškai palankios šiai rūšiai natūralizuotis ir tapti invazine. Vertinant tai, kad rūšis buvo auginama Latvijoje, yra tikimybė, kad galėjo patekti ir į Lietuvą. Būtina atlikti išsamius tyrimus, siekiant nustatyti, ar Lietuvoje aptinkamas persinis barštis, ar jo nėra.


IDspecies: 13
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R07252
commonNameNational: Sosnovskio barštis
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje labai plačiai paplitusi rūšis, aptinkama beveik visuose administraciniuose rajonuose. Retesnis tik Vakarų Lietuvos pietinėje dalyje ir Rytų Lietuvos pietinėje dalyje. Kai kur sudaro didelius plotus užimančius ir labai tankius sąžalynus. Įsikuria pievose, vandens telkinių pakrantėse, apleistuose laukuose, pakelėse, šaltiniuotose vietose ir kt. buveinėse. Dauginasi sėklomis, kurias išplatina vėjas, vanduo, transporto priemonės ir kita žmonių veikla. 
Neringos miesto savivaldybės teritorijoje rūšis išnaikinta (buvo aptinkama XX a. 10 dešimtmetyje). Daugelyje vietų Sosnovskio barščiai naikinami, tačiau iki šiol visiškai išnaikinti pavykę vos keliose vietovėse. 


IDspecies: 14
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R07276
commonNameNational: javinė mangusta
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje gamtinėmis sąlygomis iki šiol neužregistruota. Duomenų apie auginimą dirbtinėmis sąlygomis nėra. Galimybė įsitvirtinti Lietuvoje nedidelė, nes klimato sąlygos šalyje rūšiai nepalankios.


IDspecies: 15
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R07537
commonNameNational: vėdryninė raistenė
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje šios rūšies augalų gamtoje neužregistruota ir patikimos informacijos apie jų galimą auginimą akvariumuose nėra. Rūšies galimybės įsitvirtinti ir daugintis Lietuvoje netirtos, bet yra tikimybė, kad ji galėtų Vakarų Lietuvoje išgyventi gamtoje ir sukurti stabilias populiacijas. 


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R18154
addInfoPermits: The permit was issued to the Lithuanian Zoo.
commonNameNational: raštuotasis vėžlys
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Paplitimas ir populiacijos dydis Lietuvoje nežinomi. Esama informacijos, kad raštuotasis vėžlys buvo pastebėtas Neries upėje, nepatvirtintais duomenimis, stebėtas Druskininkuose ir Kaune. Anksčiau gana dažnai buvo laikomi terariumuose ir tvenkiniuose kaip dekoratyviniai gyvūnai. Duomenų apie šios rūšies veisimąsi Lietuvoje gamtinėmis sąlygomis nėra. Peržiemoja. Yra tikimybė, kad galėtų įsitvirtinti.


IDspecies: 47
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R15970
commonNameNational: azijinis juodnugaris širšuolas
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje šios rūšies vabzdžių gamtoje kol kas neužregistruota. Rūšies galimybės įsitvirtinti ir daugintis Lietuvoje netirtos, tačiau yra tikimybė, kad šios rūšies vabzdžiams patekus į šalį, jie galėtų išgyventi ir pradėti daugintis, nes yra tinkamų buveinių ir mitybos šaltinių. Didžiausia tikimybė azijiniams juodnugariams širšuolams patekti į šalį yra su importuojamais gyvais vazoniniais augalais.


IDspecies: 11
IDreport: EE-2015-2018
country: EE
EASINCode: R07248
commonNameNational: hiid-karuputk
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ee/eu/ias/envxlxidq
addInfoSpecies:
Five alien Heracleum species (Heracleum mantegazzianum, Heracleum persicum, Heracleum sosnowskyi, Heracleum pubescens and Heracleum lehmannianum) have been found in Estonia, although H. sosnowskyi is the most common the others are also present. For eradication, species is not determined to species level. Therefore the maps include all 5 species and the same map has been provided under every Heracleum species in this reporting.


IDspecies: 16
IDreport: EE-2015-2018
country: EE
EASINCode: R07719
commonNameNational: verev lemmmalts ;verev lemmalts
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ee/eu/ias/envxlxidq
addInfoSpecies:
Currently, species is predominantly spread by the garden waste and incorrect treatment of removed plants, but intentional human assistance can occur as the species is considered pretty.


IDspecies: 28
IDreport: EE-2015-2018
country: EE
EASINCode: R10336
commonNameNational: piisamrott;ondatra
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ee/eu/ias/envxlxidq
addInfoSpecies:
Species has a small population range and there is no evidence of new releases or spread in the last decades.


IDspecies: 29
IDreport: EE-2015-2018
country: EE
EASINCode: R10443
commonNameNational: ogapõskne vähk
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ee/eu/ias/envxlxidq
addInfoSpecies:
Species is known from one locality, where it entered probably by intentional release. 
There is some evidence of small local spread.

addInfoInspections:
The permit was issued 14.03.2018, no inspections were carried out within 2018. The establishment was assessed during the permitting process.


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: EE-2015-2018
country: EE
EASINCode: R18154
commonNameNational: punakõrv-ilukilpkonn
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ee/eu/ias/envxlxidq
addInfoSpecies:
Species entered through pet-trade and is released to nature by pet owners unable to keep the animals or by taking the animal to a "walk" and losing it unintentionally.


IDspecies: 0
IDreport: HU-2015-2018
country: HU
EASINCode: R00644
commonNameNational: nílusi lúd
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/hu/eu/ias/envxgklzg
addInfoSpecies:
The species was bred in 2016 and 2017 in Hungary (Vas county, in a gravel pit lake). However, the species was eradicated successfully in 2017, the female and the nine nestling were shooted.


IDspecies: 31
IDreport: HU-2015-2018
country: HU
EASINCode: R10652
commonNameNational: halcsontfarkú réce
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/hu/eu/ias/envxgklzg
addInfoSpecies:
It is very rare vagrant in autumn (November) and in spring (March), there were only two observations between 2015 and 2018. Before 2015 it was rare vagrant too, but there were more records (usually in autumn and in spring, in duck flocks).


IDspecies: 39
IDreport: HU-2015-2018
country: HU
EASINCode: R12260
commonNameNational: mosómedve
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/hu/eu/ias/envxgklzg
addInfoSpecies:
The species has been present since the 1980s in Hungary. Because of its lifestyle (usually active at night, etc.) there are few observations. As a huntable species, in every year less then ten individuals were killed by hunters (2015-2016: 8, 2016-2017: 2, 2017-2018: 8 individuals).  


IDspecies: 44
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
EASINCode: R14882
commonNameNational: Siberische grondeekhoorn [NL]; tamia de Sibérie [FR]; Sibirisches Streifenhörnchen [DE]
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfoSpecies:
Absence of management: Relative to other Union list species, T. sibiricus is considered of low priority both in terms of impact and risks of further spread. There is only one population in "forêt de soignes" that did not really expand since several decades. So, in regard to public impact of management of this population, no action was taken in this population.


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: BE-2015-2018
country: BE
EASINCode: R18154
commonNameNational: lettersierschildpad [NL]; tortue de Floride [FR]; Buchstaben-Schmuckschildkröte [DE]
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/be/eu/ias/envxifnpg
addInfoSpecies:
c: mostly dumped pets
The species is considered as established although there is no reproduction because of their long persistence in the environment


IDspecies: 3
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
EASINCode: R01830
commonNameNational: Struikaster
eradicationMeasures: true
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfoSpecies:
The species was present in the reporting period, but eradicated before the end of the period. Therefore, no map and species details are included.


IDspecies: 5
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
EASINCode: R02573
commonNameNational: Pallas' eekhoorn
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfoSpecies:
The species was present before the reporting period and eradicated before the start of the period. The population was trapped and largely sterilized before 2015 and the animals were kept in captivity. Extensive research was done after a sighting but no new animals were observed. Therefore, no map and species details are included.


IDspecies: 0
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R00644
commonNameNational: gęsiówka egipska
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Gęsiówka egipska jest gatunkiem występującym w środowisku przyrodniczym Polski, rozmnażającym się, silnie ekspansywnym. Drogi wprowadzania i rozprzestrzeniania tego gatunku, związane z udziałem człowieka, to celowa introdukcja i ucieczki z hodowli. Gęsiówka egipska ponadto rozprzestrzenia się spontanicznie, zarówno z populacji krajowej, jak i innych krajów europejskich. 
W Polsce osobniki tego gatunku pojawiły się w środowisku przyrodniczym zarówno wskutek ucieczek z prywatnych hodowli, jak i wtórnie naturalnie – z populacji zadomowionych w innych krajach europejskich. Pierwszy lęg tego gatunku w kraju, który miał miejsce w 2007 r., był następstwem ucieczki z prywatnego mini zoo. Do lęgów dochodzi obecnie przede wszystkim w południowej i północno-zachodniej części Polski. Na tych samych obszarach odnotowano również największą liczbę ptaków nielęgowych.
Do 2006 r. gęsiówka egipska  stwierdzana była w Polsce jedynie sporadycznie. W 2007 r. zanotowano 4 obserwacje tego gatunku, w tym pierwszy udany lęg. W 2008 r. nastąpił wzrost liczby stwierdzeń gęsiówki – było ich co najmniej 38, w tym 3 pary lęgowe. W 2014 r. zanotowano 6 lęgów gęsiówki egipskiej. 


IDspecies: 7
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R05440
commonNameNational: eichornia gruboogonkowa
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Eichhornia gruboogonkowa (hiacynt wodny) wykazana została jedynie ze zmienionych termicznie (podgrzanych) jezior obiegu chłodzenia elektrowni okolic Konina - Jezioro Ślesińskie. Mimo podwyższonej temperatury wody, gatunek ten nie zadomowił się w tych jeziorach. 


IDspecies: 20
IDreport: ES-2015-2018
country: ES
EASINCode: R08830
commonNameNational: Ludwigia
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/es/eu/ias/envxjdxaq
addInfoSpecies:
Detected by the early warning network in two different rivers in Extremadura.
All citations from Catalonia belong to L. peploides although the presence of L. grandiflora is not ruled out. A specific study is being carried out on the subject. No specific control actions have been carried out.


IDspecies: 31
IDreport: PT-2015-2018
country: PT
EASINCode: R10652
commonNameNational: Pato-de-rabo-alçado-americano
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pt/eu/ias/envyz_mka
addInfoSpecies:
Last sighting of a specimen in Santo André Lagoon (SW Portugal) - 14/11/2015
After intensive search with intention to shoot it, the specimen disappeared and no more sightings ocurred since that date.


IDspecies: 10
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
EASINCode: R06923
commonNameNational: Gewone gunnera
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfoSpecies:
Isolated specimens are present in historical, private and botanical gardens. No specimens are observed in the wild. Therefore, no map and species details are included.


IDspecies: 34
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
EASINCode: R03000
commonNameNational: Fraai lampenpoetsergras
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfoSpecies:
Although we do not have information on the distribution, we know that the species is present in public and private gardens. But there are no sightings in the wild. Therefore, no distribution map and species details are included.


IDspecies: 39
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
EASINCode: R12260
commonNameNational: Wasbeer
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfoSpecies:
The species was sighted incidentally in the reporting period. In 2018 first evidence of breeding, which makes it possible to locate animals and take eradication measures. 


IDspecies: 43
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
EASINCode: R19317
commonNameNational: Zwarte eekhoorn;Amerikaanse voseekhoorn
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfoSpecies:
Incidental sightings by citizen observations, but these were not validated. (((The species was present in the reporting period, but eradicated before the end of the period. Therefore, no map and species details are included.)))


IDspecies: 44
IDreport: NL-2015-2018
country: NL
EASINCode: R14882
commonNameNational: Siberische grondeekhoorn;Boeroendoek;Aziatische gestreepte grondeekhoorn;Koreaanse grondeekhoorn
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/nl/eu/ias/envxkmy7a
addInfoSpecies:
Intensive and careful monitoring of the population. There is no evidence that the population is increasing. Population is in control and not spreading, therefore no intervention is taken.


IDspecies: 16
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
EASINCode: R07719
commonNameNational: žlezava nedotika
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfoSpecies:
The species has been entering from Austria through the flow of the Drava and Mura rivers. It was used as an ornamental plant in the gardens and honeybee plant. Beekeepers planted it also in the nature in the past. 


IDspecies: 18
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
EASINCode: R08679
commonNameNational: volovska žaba
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfoSpecies:
During our field search activities in May 2014 and June 2015, a male bullfrog advertisement call was heard at Fiesa Lakes in Slovenia. On September 2015, a male specimen of the American bullfrog was caught in a funnel trap at the same location (http://web.bf.uni-lj.si/bi/NATURA-SLOVENIAE/pdf/NatSlo_18_1_3.pdf)
In the following years no more specimens were found, so it can be confirmed that the eradication was successful. 


IDspecies: 29
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
EASINCode: R10443
commonNameNational: trnavec
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfoSpecies:
Presumably by intentional human assistance. The species is present only in one location (larger system of gravel pits) in Slovenia. In Slovenia, we have not confirmed asexual reproduction, but there has been evidence of asexual reproduction of the species in the literature (Buřič M., Hulák M., Kouba A., petrusek A., Kozák P. 2011. A Succesufl Crayfish Invader Is Capable of Facultative Parthenogenesis: A Novel Reproductive Mode in Decapod Crustaceans).


IDspecies: 37
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
EASINCode: R12250
commonNameNational: močvirski škarjar
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfoSpecies:
In Slovenia there has been an intentional release of the species in 2018. Two bags (it was not possible to determine the exact number) of live Procambarus clarkii were released at the gas and resting station "Lopata" along the highway. Immediately after we were notified about the release, the search of the area was performed. 80 individuals were picked up in the near vicinity of the release in the next 24 hours. Fisheries Research Institute immediately established the monitoring of the area. In the period of about a month, two individuals were caught in the traps inside the draining pond at the end of the parking lot. Fisheries Research Institute of Slovenia continued with monitoring of the area and surrounding watercourses untill the end of season (October 2018) but no crayfish was found. Simultaneously there was an eDNA sample investigation of surrounding area done and results obtained in december 2018 have shown positive traces of the species in two surrounding streams.  In 2019 we are continuing with the scanning of the area in accordance with results of eDNA testing. Results of eDNA have also shown positive traces in Paka river (Štajerska region) and Vogršček stream (Primorska region). The positive traces in these locations are consequences of separate releases, not a consequence of the release from Lopata gas station. So far, there is no evidence of established naturalised populations yet. 


IDspecies: 41
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
EASINCode: R12644
commonNameNational: kudzu
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: asexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfoSpecies:
There has been 2 locations of the kudzu vine in Slovenia, near Strunjan and Dekani, both on the coastal area.


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: SI-2015-2018
country: SI
EASINCode: R18154
commonNameNational: popisana sklednica
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/si/eu/ias/envxjtew
addInfoSpecies:
The species reproduce mostly at the Obalno-Kraška and Goriška Region, but the reproduction has also been observed in the Central and Eastern Slovenia. The red-eared slider is still quite common pet turtle, so it is impossible to exclude further intentional releases of the pet turtle keepers. 


IDspecies: 2
IDreport: DK-2015-2018
country: DK
EASINCode: R01529
commonNameNational: Kæmpe-silkeplante
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/dk/eu/ias/envxl8tna
addInfoSpecies:
The species has previously been registered in atlas flora danica and therefore included in an eradication project. However the area has been searched itensively and only Eupatorium cannabinum was found. Denmark therefore no longer considers Asclepias syriaca present. 


IDspecies: 29
IDreport: DK-2015-2018
country: DK
EASINCode: R10443
commonNameNational: Amerikansk flodkrebs
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: true
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/dk/eu/ias/envxl8tna
addInfoInspections:
The crayfish was used for making an identification key for the crayfish and later used in making eDNA identification systems. The speciments are now in the collections in the Danish Natural History Museum. 


IDspecies: 30
IDreport: DK-2015-2018
country: DK
EASINCode: R10445
commonNameNational: Viril krebs
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: true
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/dk/eu/ias/envxl8tna
addInfoInspections:
The crayfish was used for making an identification key for the crayfish and later used in making eDNA identification systems. The speciments are now in the collections in the museum. 


IDspecies: 32
IDreport: DK-2015-2018
country: DK
EASINCode: R10676
commonNameNational: Signalkrebs
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/dk/eu/ias/envxl8tna
addInfoSpecies:
Crayfish plague has been found in populations in Jutland and on Zealand. The highest concentration of crayfish plague was found in Jutland. Populations on Funen was tested and crayfish plague was not found


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: DK-2015-2018
country: DK
EASINCode: R18154
commonNameNational: Rødøret terrapin;Cumberland terrapin;Guløret terrapin
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/dk/eu/ias/envxl8tna
addInfoInspections:
University of Århus and University of Copenhagen have research permits. University of Copenhagen renewed its permit from 2016 in 2018


IDspecies: 2
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R01529
commonNameNational: Асклепиас
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
It is very likely that the species first entered Bulgaria with intentional human assistance - the species was imported in the first half of XX century and cultivated in private gardens as ornamental and melliferous plant. However, some localities along Danube River may have appeared through natural dispersal from neighbouring countries, e.g. from Serbia and Hungary.
Reference:
Petrova, A., Vladimirov, V., Georgiev, V. 2013. Invasive Alien Species of Vascular Plants in Bulgaria. IBER – BAS, Sofia. 320 pp. ISBN 978-954-9746-30-3 (available at: https://www.esenias.org/files/IAS_Plants_Bulgaria_2013_En-1.pdf).


IDspecies: 4
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R02476
commonNameNational: Каролинска кабомба
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Reference:
Цонева, С., Георгиев, В., Владимиров, В., Петрова, А. 2017. Cabomba caroliniana, Lagarosiphon major, Ludwigia peploides. – В: Тричкова, Т, Владимиров, Вл., Томов, Р., Тодоров, М. (ред.). Атлас на инвазивните чужди видове от значение за Европейския съюз, ИБЕИ-БАН, ESENIAS, София, ISBN:978-954-9746-43-3.


IDspecies: 5
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R02573
commonNameNational: Катерица на Палас
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Koshev Y., Nedyalkov N. 2017. Callosciurus erythraeus Pallas, 1779. Pp. 126-129. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Koshev Y., Nedyalkov N. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Callosciurus erythraeus Pallas, 1779, in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015.


IDspecies: 6
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R04121
commonNameNational: Индийска домашна врана
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Nikolov B. 2017. Corvus splendens Vieillot, 1817. Pp. 114-117. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Nikolov B. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Corvus splendens Vieillot, 1817, in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 7
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R05440
commonNameNational: Воден зюмбюл
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Reference:
Петрова, А., Владимиров, В., Георгиев, В., Цонева, С. 2017. Eicchornia crassipes, Heracleum persicum, Heracleum sosnowskyi, Lysichiton americanus. – В: Тричкова, Т, Владимиров, Вл., Томов, Р., Тодоров, М. (ред.). Атлас на инвазивните чужди видове от значение за Европейския съюз, ИБЕИ-БАН, ESENIAS, София, ISBN:978-954-9746-43-3.


IDspecies: 8
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R05501
commonNameNational: Нуталиева водна чума
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: asexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Flowerng of some individuals have been observed in Bulgaria, however, there is no evidence for formation of seeds and sexual reproduction.
Reference:
Petrova, A., Vladimirov, V., Georgiev, V. 2013. Invasive Alien Species of Vascular Plants in Bulgaria. IBER – BAS, Sofia. 320 pp. ISBN 978-954-9746-30-3 (available at: https://www.esenias.org/files/IAS_Plants_Bulgaria_2013_En-1.pdf).


IDspecies: 9
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R05836
commonNameNational: Китайски мъхнат крив рак
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Trichkova T., Kutsarov Y., Todorov M., Puky M. & Hubenov Z. 2017. The Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne Edwards, 1853 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Varunidae), a new invasive alien species to the Bulgarian fauna. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, Supplement 9: 149-154. http://www.acta-zoologica-bulgarica.eu/downloads/acta-zoologica-bulgarica/2017/supplement-9-149-154.pdf
Hubenov Z., Trichkova T., Todorov M., Kutsarov Y. 2017. Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne Edwards, 1853. Pp. 70-73. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) Available at: http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Hubenov Z., Trichkova T., Todorov M. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne Edwards, 1853, in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 11
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R07248
commonNameNational: Гигантски девисил; Мантегацианов девисил
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
The species has been recently reported for Bulgaria - in 2017 (see Vladimirov, V. & al. (2017) in Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, Suppl. 9: 47-51, however, the species was erroneously reported as H. sosnowskyi). It is not clear how the species entered the country.


IDspecies: 14
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R07276
commonNameNational: Малка индийска мангуста
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Nedyalkov N., Koshev Y. 2017. Herpestes javanicus E. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1818. Pp. 130-133. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Nedyalkov N., Koshev Y. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Herpestes javanicus E. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1818, in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 15
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R07537
commonNameNational: Лютичевидно хидрокотиле
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Reference:
Георгиев, В., Цонева, С., Владимиров, В., Петрова, А. 2017. Hydrocotyle ranunculoides, Ludwigia grandiflora, Myriophyllum aquaticum. – В: Тричкова, Т, Владимиров, Вл., Томов, Р., Тодоров, М. (ред.). Атлас на инвазивните чужди видове от значение за Европейския съюз, ИБЕИ-БАН, ESENIAS, София, ISBN:978-954-9746-43-3.


IDspecies: 16
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R07719
commonNameNational: Жлезиста слабонога
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
The species is relatively widely cultivated as ornamental plant in private gardens, especially in lower- and mid-mountainous regions (500 to 1500 m a.s.l.). Once escaped from the gardens, the species spread naturally along rivers and streams.
Reference:
Petrova, A., Vladimirov, V., Georgiev, V. 2013. Invasive Alien Species of Vascular Plants in Bulgaria. IBER – BAS, Sofia. 320 pp. ISBN 978-954-9746-30-3 (available at: https://www.esenias.org/files/IAS_Plants_Bulgaria_2013_En-1.pdf).


IDspecies: 18
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R08679
commonNameNational: Американска жаба бик
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Lukanov S., Popgeorgiev S. 2017. Lithobates catesbеianus (Shaw, 1802). Pp. 106-109. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf 
Lukanov S., Popgeorgiev G., Tzankov N. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Lithobates catesbеianus (Shaw, 1802) in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 23
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R09640
commonNameNational: Китайски мунтжак
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Nedyalkov N., Koshev Y. 2017. Muntiacus reevesi Ogilby, 1839. Pp. 134-137. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Nedyalkov N., Koshev Y. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Muntiacus reevesi Ogilby, 1839 in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 24
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R09720
commonNameNational: Нутрия
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Nedyalkov N., Koshev Y. 2017. Myocastor coypus Molina, 1782. Pp. 138-141. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Koshev Y., Nedyalkov N. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Myocastor coypus Molina, 1782, in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 27
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R09857
commonNameNational: Южноамериканско носато мече (коати)
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Nedyalkov N., Koshev Y. 2017. Nasua nasua Linnaeus, 1766. Pp. 142-145. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Nedyalkov N., Koshev Y. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Nasua nasua Linnaeus, 1766, in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 29
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R10443
commonNameNational: Американски шипобузест рак
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Todorov M., Trichkova T., Hubenov Z., Jurajda P. 2019. Orconectes limosus (Rafinesque, 1817) (Decapoda: Cambaridae), a new invasive alien species of European Union concern in Bulgaria. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica. (Submitted)
Todorov M., Trichkova T., Hubenov Z. 2017. Orconectes limosus (Rafinesque, 1817). Pp. 74-77. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Todorov M., Trichkova T., Hubenov Z. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Orconectes limosus (Rafinesque, 1817) in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 30
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R10445
commonNameNational: Северен рак
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Todorov M., Trichkova T., Hubenov Z. 2017. Orconectes virilis (Hagen, 1870). Pp. 78-81. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Todorov M., Trichkova T., Hubenov Z. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Orconectes virilis (Hagen, 1870) in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 42
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R13698
commonNameNational: Източна сива катерица
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Koshev Y., Nedyalkov N. 2017. Sciurus carolinensis Gmelin, 1788. Pp. 150-153. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Koshev Y., Nedyalkov N. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Sciurus carolinensis Gmelin, 1788, in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 43
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R19317
commonNameNational: Лисича катерица
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Koshev Y., Nedyalkov N. 2017. Sciurus niger Linnaeus, 1758. Pp. 154-157. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Koshev Y., Nedyalkov N. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Sciurus niger Linnaeus, 1758, in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 11
IDreport: GB-2015-2018
country: UK
EASINCode: R07248
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/gb/eu/ias/envxjyqya
commonNameNational:
Giant Cow Parsley;Giant Hogweed;Cartwheel-Flower; Persian hogweed;Giant Cow Parsnip;Mantegazzi's Cow-Parsnip


IDspecies: 44
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R14882
commonNameNational: Азиатски (сибирски) бурундук
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Koshev Y., Nedyalkov N. 2017. Tamias sibiricus Laxmann, 1769. Pp. 158-161. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Koshev Y., Nedyalkov N. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Tamias sibiricus Laxmann, 1769, in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 45
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R15136
commonNameNational: Свещен ибис
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Nikolov B. 2017. Threskiornis aethiopicus Latham, 1790. Pp. 122-125. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Nikolov B. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Threskiornis aethiopicus Latham, 1790 in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R18154
commonNameNational: Червенобуза, жълтобуза и къмбърлендова водни костенурки
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Tzankov N., Stoyanov A., Dobrev D., Lukanov S., Kornilev Y., Andonov K., Vergilov V., Popgeorgiev G. 2017. Trachemys scripta (Thunberg in Schoepff, 1792). Pp. 110-113. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Popgeorgiev G., Lukanov S., Tzankov N. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Trachemys scripta (Thunberg in Schoepff, 1792) in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 47
IDreport: BG-2015-2018
country: BG
EASINCode: R15970
commonNameNational: Азиатски стършел
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/bg/eu/ias/envxpd2aq
addInfoSpecies:
Tomov R. 2017. Vespa velutina nigrithorax de Buysson, 1905. Pp. 94-97. In: Trichkova T., Vladimirov V., Tomov R., Todorov M. (Eds.), Guide to invasive alien species of European Union Concern, IBER-BAS, ESENIAS, Sofia, 184 pp. (In Bulgarian) http://esenias.org/files/ESENIAS_Atlas_WEB.pdf
Tomov R. 2017. Analysis of pathways for introduction and spread of the invasive alien species of EU concern Vespa velutina nigrithorax de Buysson, 1905, in Bulgaria. ESENIAS-TOOLS Project, D-33-51/30.06.2015. (In Bulgarian)


IDspecies: 18
IDreport: GB-2015-2018
country: UK
EASINCode: R08679
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/gb/eu/ias/envxjyqya
addInfoSpecies:
This species was present before being listed as a species of Union Concern, was not widespread and has since been eradicated.


IDspecies: 19
IDreport: GB-2015-2018
country: UK
EASINCode: R17663
commonNameNational: Large-flower Primrose-willow
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: asexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/gb/eu/ias/envxjyqya
addInfoSpecies:
This species was present before being listed as a species of Union Concern, is not widespread and is in the process of being eradicated.


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: GB-2015-2018
country: UK
EASINCode: R18154
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/gb/eu/ias/envxjyqya
commonNameNational:
Slider;Yellow-bellied Slider Turtle; Common Slider;Red Ear Slider;Red Eared Slider Turtle;Cumberland Slider Turtle;Yellowbelly Slider


IDspecies: 0
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R00644
commonNameNational: Gé Éigipteach
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
This species was last recorded in Ireland over a number of days in June 2016. It was recorded in a nature reserve where there are avid bird watchers there on a daily basis. If the bird was still present it would have been recorded. Hence, there is a very high level of confidence that this species is no longer present in the area. 


IDspecies: 8
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R05501
commonNameNational: no common name
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: asexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
Elodea nuttallii first reported from Ireland in 1974 and was widespread and locally abundant prior to 2015. It mostly occurs in still or slow-flowing fresh waters but it can tolerate some salinity. It has been recorded in lakes, reservoirs, ponds, rivers, streams, canals and ditches. 
In Ireland, only female plants of Elodea nuttallii  have been recorded and so it reproduces asexually from vegetative fragments. Anthropogenic-mediated transfer is the principal pathway to facilitate the establishment of the plant from colonised to uncolonized waters. The movement of boats and angling gear has a high potential to inadvertently spread Elodea nuttallii within and between watersheds. Natural dispersal within a watercourse also occurs. 

A full detailed all-Ireland risk assessment for this species was undertaken in 2014. The conclusion response for the overall risk of this species in Ireland was MAJOR with a VERY HIGH level of confidence. The full risk assessment can be accessed from: http://nonnativespecies.ie/risk-assessments/  

This species is also on the Invasive Alien Species of Member State concern list reported under the genus Elodea species in Section B. 

An online species account with access to an interactive map of all verified sightings is available from: https://species.biodiversityireland.ie


IDspecies: 9
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R05836
commonNameNational: Portán miotógach
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
The species was previously recorded in 2006 and 2009 when the animals were caught by fisherman. Additional surveys at those times did not detect any more animals as present. None have been reported since 2009. 


IDspecies: 10
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R06923
commonNameNational: Gunnaire
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
This species is also on the Invasive Alien Species of Member State concern list reported in Section B.

A full detailed all-Ireland risk assessment for this species was undertaken in 2014. The conclusion response for the overall risk of this species in Ireland was MAJOR with a Medium level of confidence. The full risk assessment can be accessed from: http://nonnativespecies.ie/risk-assessments/  

An online species account with access to an interactive map of all verified sightings is available from: https://species.biodiversityireland.ie 


IDspecies: 11
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R07248
commonNameNational: Feabhrán capaill
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
Heracleum mantegazzianum has a widespread distribution in Ireland and is particularly abundant along rivers in the southern half. In Ireland it favours damp ground and occurs on riversides, roadsides, railway sides, waste/disturbed ground and in former cultivated fields.
Heracleum mantegazzianum was introduced to Ireland in the 19th century as an ornamental garden plant and its first noted escape from cultivation was in 1902-03, in Dublin. 
Natural dispersal is predominantly through natural spread of seed easily dispersed by wind and water, attached to animals and through human activities such as movement of soil or inadvertant movement of seeds on vehicles and machinery.


IDspecies: 16
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R07719
commonNameNational: Lus na pléisce
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
Impatiens glandulifera has a widespread distribution in Ireland where it is often locally abundant. First reported in the wild in 1906. In Ireland it is primarily recorded along riparian areas but is also recorded on roadsides and in waste ground, damp woodland and former cultivated fields.
Introduced to Ireland in the 19th century as a garden ornamental, Himalayan balsam escaped from cultivation, spread and established along watercourses and in adjacent damp habitats. It has also been sold in seed mixes in Ireland. 
Spread is mainly through natural dispersal of seeds, but these may also be carried from infested areas by vehciles, machinery, watersport equipment, footwear or in infested soils.
This species is also on the Invasive Alien Species of Member State concern list reported in Section B.
An online species account with access to an interactive map of all verified sightings is available from: https://species.biodiversityireland.ie 


IDspecies: 17
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R08062
commonNameNational: Líobhógach Afracach
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: asexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
Lagarosiphon major has a scattered but locally abundant distribution in Ireland. 
Only female flower plants have been recorded in Ireland so reproduciton and spread is by vegetative fragmentation. 
Lagarosiphon major was until recently sold as an oxygenator/ornamental plant for garden ponds and aquaria. Most recorded sites are garden and park ponds or artifical waterbosdies. Introduction into natural waterbodies occured either accidentally through flooding or via waterfowl, or deliberately by dumping of plant material into waterbodies (one documented case of this occuring). Natual and unintentional human assisted spread is likely by plant fragments being carried by wind and water, in boats and angling equipment, and attached to animals, equipment, vehicles and clothing.

This species is also on the Invasive Alien Species of Member State concern list reported in Section B.

A full detailed all-Ireland risk assessment for this species was undertaken in 2014. The conclusion response for the overall risk of this species in Ireland was MAJOR with a VERY HIGH level of confidence. The full risk assessment can be accessed from: http://nonnativespecies.ie/risk-assessments/  

An online species account with access to an interactive map of all verified sightings is available from: https://species.biodiversityireland.ie 


IDspecies: 19
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R17663
commonNameNational: no common name
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
Ludwigia grandiflora was recorded from two separate artificial pond sites in 2009. A rapid response was initiated and the plant was eradicated from the two sites. There have been no further verified or anecdotal reports of this plant in Ireland. 


IDspecies: 21
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R08915
commonNameNational: Geathar buí
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
In Ireland Lysichiton americanus has a scattered distribution and is locally abundant in sites where it has been long established. It was introduced to Irish gardens as an ornamental in the last century and it is as escapes and discards from these that most occurrences in the wild in Ireland have originated. It is known to have been deliberately introduced into the wild in at least one instance around 1930, when it was planted in Woodfield Bog, Co. Offaly. 
The species is persistent once established, but only rarely forms large stands. Establishment and spread of new populations in Ireland is likely to be very slow and restricted by a limited availability of wet habitat. 
A full detailed risk assessment for this species was undertaken in 2014. The conclusion response for the overall risk of this species in Ireland was MINOR with a Medium level of confidence. The full risk assessment can be accessed from: http://nonnativespecies.ie/risk-assessments/ 
An online species account with access to an interactive map of verified sightings is available from: https://species.biodiversityireland.ie

This species is also on the Invasive Alien Species of Member State concern list reported in Section B.


IDspecies: 23
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R09640
commonNameNational: Muinseac
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
To date, there have only been sparse casual sightings for Muntiacus reevesi in Ireland with no evidence to suggest the species is reproducing. There is concern that the species has the potential to reproduce in Ireland as there are reproducing populations in neighbouring Northern Ireland. 
There were four verified sightings of Muntiacus reevesi in Ireland from four different sites within the reporting period. Each sighting was of an individual adult. For two of these sightigns, an early detection alert and rapid response was issued via NOTSYS with one successful eradication. For the other two sightings, National Parks and Wildlife Service were altered but the animals could not be located again. Local National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Rangers remain vigilant for surveillance of the species from these areas. 
Muntjac have been intentionally brought to Ireland, most likely from the UK and most likely for sport/hunting or private holdings. They have either been deliberately released into the wild or have escaped from private collections. Once present and established they would be expected to expand their range at a similar pace to that seen in England (1km per year) though that spread may be facilitated by secondary introductions and translocations within Ireland.
In Ireland a 12 month licenced open hunting season is in place for male and female Muntjac deer. 

This species is also on the Invasive Alien Species of Member State concern list reported in Section B.

A full detailed risk assessment for this species was undertaken in 2014. The conclusion response for the overall risk of this species in Ireland was MODERATE with a Medium level of confidence. The full risk assessment can be accessed from: http://nonnativespecies.ie/risk-assessments/  
An online species account with access to an interactive map of verified sightings is available from: https://species.biodiversityireland.ie 


IDspecies: 24
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R09720
commonNameNational: Francach abhann
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
Myocastor coypus have been recorded from 5 hectads during the 2015-2018 reporting period. For three of the sites, just one individual was seen in each site. Of those, two of the animals were removed and taken into captivity. 
The only known established population of Coypu in Ireland is from near Cork City which covers two hectads (W66 and W67 in Irish National Grid). After 4 Myocastor coypus were first reported from this core populaiton site in 2016, a rapid response to survey and remove the animals in the area was initiated on 03/10/2016 with 10 animals removed by 03/11/2016. This sighting resulted in the first Early Detection and Rapid Response alerts issued via the NOTSYS. Surveillance is ongoing at the site with animals trapped animals being euthanized and then deposited with University College Cork for post-mortum examination including DNA Analysis. It is hoped that the DNA analysis will help track the source of the population and see if the animals are connected to each other. 
Efforts to ascertain extent of Coypu in Cork City area have been extended by encouraging citizen surveillance and reporting of all suspected sightings. 
This species is also on the Invasive Alien Species of Member State concern list reported in Section B.
An online species account with access to an interactive map of all verified sightings is available from: https://species.biodiversityireland.ie


IDspecies: 25
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R18934
commonNameNational: Líonán cleiteach
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: asexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
Myriophyllum aquaticum has a scattered distribution and is scarce in abundance at a most sites in Ireland, except at sites in counties Cork, Waterford and Offaly where it could be considered invasive.
All plants outside its native range to date have been female so it reproduces and spreads solely by vegetative reproduction and plant fragments.
It was widely sold as an oxygenator or ornamental plant and is present moslty in artificial watercourses and ponds. There are few natural waterbody sites where it occurs and introduction/spread to these sites may be by escape during flooding or attached to waterfowl or deliberate introducution. 


IDspecies: 28
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R10336
commonNameNational: Muscfhrancach
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
One casual sighting of one individual in February 2015. Local National Parks and Wildlife Service staff were notified of the sighting but the animal was not found. No further sightings have been reported. 


IDspecies: 31
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R10652
commonNameNational: Lacha rua
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
Species status as not reproducing in Ireland is based on the current best available information with no data to underpin a contention that Ruddy duck is a regular breeding bird in Ireland. The reduction of Ruddy duck sightings in recent years is suspected to be attributed to the population eradication and control being undertaken in Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 


IDspecies: 39
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R12260
commonNameNational: no common name
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
Rare scattered casual occurrences of Procyon lotor have been reported in Ireland with no evidence to suggest this species is reproducing. Most likely source of individuals in Ireland and subsequent introductions are pets, either deliberately released or escaping from confinement. Most animals seen are in an urban setting and associated with entering gardens with a few sightings of the animals entering or being in small scale domestic Chicken coops. 
Of the 8 animals verified during the reporting period (2015-2018), 2 were separate sightings of roadkill; 3 were dispatched (for two separate sites); 1 taken into captivity and; 2 animals for separate sites could not be relocated for removal.
An online species account with access to an interactive map of verified sightings is available from: https://species.biodiversityireland.ie 


IDspecies: 42
IDreport: IE-2015-2018
country: IE
EASINCode: R13698
commonNameNational: Iora glas
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/ie/eu/ias/envxnwrqq
addInfoSpecies:
First documented deliberate introduction to the wild was in 1911 in Co. Longford where the animals were released for aesthetic reasons and from where they spread. Sciurus carolinensis is established with abundant and widespread populations predominantly in the east of the country. Latest surveys show they continue to expand their range, particularly in the north-west (Donegal) and in the south and southwest (Waterford, Limerick and Cork). Their recent decline in the midlands has been attributed to the recovery of Pine marten (Martes martes) in the area. Population estimated at 250,000 animals in 2008 but may have since dropped by up to 10% but there is an active national survey underway to better inform this.
The River Shannon is seen as a natural barrier to restrict westwards spread but the lack of suitable habitat linking woodlands may also limit westwards movement.
This species is also on the Invasive Alien Species of Member State concern list reported in Section B.
An online species account with access to an interactive map of all verified sightings is available from: https://species.biodiversityireland.ie


IDspecies: 2
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R01529
commonNameNational: trojeść amerykańska
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Od XVIII w. gatunek uprawiany był na obszarze Polski jako roślina włókiennicza, kauczukodajna, nektarodajna i ozdobna i zapewne już wówczas dziczał. Pierwsze opublikowane obserwacje ze stanu dzikiego pochodzą z drugiej połowy XIX w. (1862 r., Sapalski wg Rostafińskiego 1872). Uprawa trojeści amerykańskiej kontynuowana jest po czasy współczesne, głównie dla potrzeb pszczelarstwa, ale także jako rośliny ozdobnej i energetycznej. Wiele populacji w stanie dzikim bierze swój początek ze stanowisk w uprawie. Gatunek rozprzestrzenia się przez wiatrosiewne nasiona oraz przez rozrost podziemnych kłączy. Dotychczasowe rozmieszczenie i struktura przestrzenna populacji wskazują, że ekspansja rozwija się dzięki strategii typu "falanga", głównie poprzez rozrastanie się skupień na drodze wegetatywnej, inicjowanych przez rośliny celowo lub nieintencjonalnie wprowadzane do środowiska przez człowieka. W sposób niezamierzony trojeść amerykańska może być zawlekana zarówno w postaci nasion, jak i fragmentów kłączy, wraz z odpadami roślinnymi z ogrodów, z ziemią podczas różnych prac rolnych, budowlanych lub drogowych.
Trojeść amerykańska posiada rozproszone stanowiska na terenie całej Polski. Ich genezę można wiązać z celowym wprowadzaniem gatunku do uprawy jako rośliny ozdobnej i miododajnej oraz z zawlekaniem diaspor gatunku (nasion, fragmentów kłączy) w efekcie niezamierzonych działań człowieka (najczęściej z transportem). Od tego czasu liczba stanowisk wzrosła do blisko 100. Gatunek jest zadomowiony przede wszystkim na siedliskach antropogenicznych – przydrożach, terenach kolejowych i nieużytkach porolnych, w tym także na obszarach śród- i przyleśnych. Liczebność populacji na stanowisku jest zróżnicowana, jednak często ograniczona do niewielkiej liczby osobników (kęp) i niewielkich płatów.


IDspecies: 4
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R02476
commonNameNational: kabomba karolińska
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: asexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Gatunek prawdopodobnie zawleczony przez akwarystów, nie jest jednak jasna geneza stanowiska w kompleksie dawnych płuczek rud cynkowo-ołowiowych w Krążku, zaadaptowanych na stawy – nie można wykluczyć także przeniesienia fragmentów pędów przez ptaki wodno-błotne w czasie sezonowych wędrówek na północ – gatunek jest już lokalnie liczny na Nizinie Węgierskiej. Możliwe było także wsiedlenie gatunku jako rośliny ozdobnej – stawy są wykorzystywane jako teren rekreacyjny (lokalny park), wprowadzono do nich m.in. grzybienie ogrodowe (Nymphaea ×hybrida). Gatunek znaleziono w początkowej fazie inwazji, dopiero po kilku latach gwałtownie zwiększył liczebność, zajmując wszystkie trzy stawy kompleksu, w roku 2018 obserwowano pierwsze pędy także w strumieniu wypływającym ze stawów. Podczas kilku lat obserwacji (2011-2018) gatunek zwiększył liczebność z kilkudziesięciu do kilku tysięcy m2 zajętej powierzchni. Taki sposób inwazji (początkowo powolny rozrost populacji, później eksplozja liczebności) jest typowy dla gatunku. Istnieje wysokie niebezpieczeństwo rozwleczenia gatunku do zbiorników w okolicy – np. przez przypadkowe przeniesienie fragmentów pędów na siatkach na ryby – stawy są intensywnie wykorzystywane wędkarsko. Dotąd nie stwierdzono jednak innych stanowisk gatunku, mimo prowadzonych poszukiwań w tym kierunku.


IDspecies: 8
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R05501
commonNameNational: moczarka delikatna
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: asexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Na terenie Polski moczarka delikatna została zidentyfikowana po raz pierwszy w latach 1990–1993 w starorzeczu Biebrzy koło Goniądza. W 2007 roku stwierdzono jej występowanie w wodach Wisły. Szczegółowe badania rozmieszczenia tego gatunku prowadzone od 2012 r. w kraju wskazują gwałtowne rozprzestrzenianie się tego gatunku oraz wzrost inwazyjności. Elodea nuttallii rozprzestrzenia się głównie w dolinach dużych rzek: Wisły (głównie w środkowym biegu), ujściu Odry i sporadycznie Warty (region Środkowa Dolina Warty). Obecność E. nuttallii wykazano również z kilku jezior, m.in. Ryńskiego, Mikołajskiego czy Kuc (dane PMŚ). Występuje również w starorzeczach i zbiornikach zaporowych, związanych z dolinami rzecznymi. Większość stanowisk w kraju stwierdzono po roku 2000. Obecnie największa populacja moczarki delikatnej występuje w ujściowym odcinku Odry - od jeziora Dąbie, rzekę Świnę po zatokę Szczecińską. Jest bardzo prawdopodobne, że ze względu na swoje podobieństwo do bardziej powszechnego gatunku, moczarki kanadyjskiej E. canadensis, E. nuttallii była i jest z nią mylona, stąd doniesienia o jej występowaniu w Polsce (podobnie jak w innych krajach europejskich) mogą być zaniżone, a gatunek może występować liczniej i na większej liczbie stanowisk, niż się obecnie uważa.


IDspecies: 9
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R05836
commonNameNational: krab wełnistoręki; krab wełnistoszczypcy
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
W Polsce obecność kraba wełnistorękiego stwierdzono po raz pierwszy w 1928 roku w Jeziorze Dąbie. Od tego momentu, w kolejnych latach gatunek ten pojawiał się sporadycznie w rzekach zachodniej Polski, tj. Odrze, Noteci, Warcie i Wiśle oraz wzdłuż polskiego wybrzeża. Został także znaleziony w jeziorze Wydmińskim na Mazurach. Były to zwykle doniesienia o pojedynczych, dużych osobnikach. Dopiero od końca lat 90. ubiegłego wieku gatunek ten zaczął pojawiać się regularnie w lekko słonych zbiornikach, jak estuarium Odry czy Zalew Wiślany. Kraby rozprzestrzeniają się prawdopodobnie samoistnie z Niemiec, gdzie występuje liczna populacja tego gatunku. 
Chociaż informacje pozwalające na ocenę dynamiki gatunku w ciągu ostatnich 20 lat nie były zbierane w sposób systematyczny i reprezentatywny, to wydaje się, iż pozwalają one stwierdzić, iż w ciągu tego okresu liczba zajętych dotychczas stanowisk, jak i liczba stwierdzeń osobników kraba wełnistorękiego nie zmieniła się w zakresie większym niż 1/5. Od 20 lat gatunek ten występuje na stanowiskach w Jeziorze Dąbie, estuarium Odry i Zalewie Szczecińskim, w liczebności wynoszącej średnio powyżej 100 osobników w ciągu roku. Natomiast liczebność tego gatunku na stanowiskach w dwóch innych akwenach, Zalewie Wiślanym i Zatoce Gdańskiej, nie przekracza odpowiednio 40 i 100 osobników rocznie. Dodatkowo, krab wełnistoręki pojawia się pojedynczo lub w małej liczbie na wielu innych stanowiskach w Polsce.
Mimo, iż dorosłe osobniki kraba wełnistorękiego występują w Polsce już od kilku dekad, to brak jest zadomowionej populacji tego gatunku. Wynika to z faktu, iż larwy wymagają do rozwoju wód morskich, o zasoleniu wyższym niż występujące w Polskich Obszarach Morskich. Jest mało prawdopodobne, aby wzrost temperatury w prognozowanym zakresie zwiększył tolerancję larw tego gatunku na niskie zasolenie występujące w Polsce.


IDspecies: 10
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R06923
commonNameNational: gunera brazylijska
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Gatunek dotarł do Polski po drugiej wojnie światowej (ale przed 1980 r.) jako przedmiot celowego transportu i handlu roślinami egzotycznymi, w celu uprawy w ogrodach botanicznych, arboretach i ogrodach prywatnych. Dotychczas była to jedna z dość popularnych roślin wykorzystywanych przez architektów krajobrazu i projektantów ogrodów. Nie jest łatwa w uprawie, wymaga opieki człowieka by przeżyć zimę. W uprawach zawiązują się owocki, ale pod rośliną macierzystą nie obserwuje się siewek. Do tej pory nie pojawiła się w środowisku przyrodniczym.


IDspecies: 11
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R07248
commonNameNational: barszcz Mantegazziego
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Gatunek był w Polsce wprowadzany do środowiska jako roślina ozdobna w I połowie XX w. W dawnym województwie szczecińskim był uprawiany w wiejskich parkach, skąd samorzutnie się rozprzestrzeniał. Dla określenia możliwości rozprzestrzeniania się i uprawy gatunku, introdukowano go w Trzęsaczu, Karnicy i Cerkwicy w powiecie gryfickim. W okresie intensywnej uprawy pokrewnego barszczu Sosnowskiego (Heracleum sosnowskyi) w celach paszowych, również omawiany gatunek mógł być wprowadzany do eksperymentalnych upraw przy PGR i doświadczalnych stacjach rolniczych. Pierwsze stanowiska gatunku poza uprawą stwierdzono w powiecie gryfickim, we wsi Parnica – według jej mieszkańców, w stanie zdziczałym znany był przed rokiem 1950.
W Polsce jest obserwowany na bardzo wielu stanowiskach. Z powodu trudności w odróżnieniu barszczu Mantegazziego od barszczu Sosnowskiego dokładna liczba stanowisk tego gatunku nie jest znana, jednak z bazy stanowisk Zespołu ekspertów Barszcz.edu.pl notującej łącznie zgłoszenia miejsc występowania barszczu Sosnowskiego i barszczu Mantegazziego wynika, że rośliny te prawdopodobnie występują w każdym województwie. W ciągu ostatnich 20 lat stwierdzono wiele nowych stanowisk gatunku, przede wszystkich na terenach zabudowanych, łąkach i brzegach rzek, skąd przenika do lasów łęgowych i ziołorośli. Tylko w województwie dolnośląskim, w 2010 roku odnotowano 30 stanowisk gatunku liczących łącznie 11441 dojrzałych osobników, dla innych regionów kraju brak tak szczegółowych danych.


IDspecies: 13
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R07252
commonNameNational: barszcz Sosnowskiego
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Gatunek był wprowadzany w II połowie XX w. najpierw do uprawy eksperymentalnej, a następnie masowo w latach 70-80-tych uprawiano go w Państwowych Gospodarstwach Rolnych na terenie całej Polski. Rośliny te miały stanowić podstawę do sporządzania kiszonki dla bydła, jednak zwierzęta niechętnie spożywały taki pokarm, a ponadto zaczęły ujawniać się toksyczne właściwości gatunku – poparzeniom ulegały zarówno zwierzęta, jak i ludzie. Ponadto uzyskiwane w produkcji mleko i mięso miało zmieniony smak. Z biegiem lat zaniechano uprawy, jednak nie zlikwidowano skutecznie wszystkich roślin. Pozostawione osobniki zaczęły się dziko rozprzestrzeniać. Do rozprzestrzenienia się gatunku mogli przyczynić się także pszczelarze, którzy hodowali ten gatunek jako wysoce miododajny. Nie można wykluczyć, że barszcz Sosnowskiego był także sadzony (podobnie jak barszcz Mantegazziego), jako roślina ozdobna. Z miejsc uprawy barszcz Sosnowskiego rozprzestrzeniał się najpierw na tereny sąsiednie, a następnie dalej (np. z wiatrem, wzdłuż dróg, ze spływem rzek itd.). Pierwsze opublikowane dane odnotowujące występowanie gatunku poza uprawą pochodzą z lat 80. ubiegłego wieku, chociaż gatunek mógł posiadać spontaniczne stanowiska wcześniej. Obecnie gatunek wciąż w wielu miejscach utrzymuje się w sąsiedztwie niegdysiejszej uprawy, ale pojawia się także na zupełnie nowych obszarach oddalonych od pól uprawnych.
W Polsce jest obserwowany na bardzo wielu stanowiskach. Z powodu trudności w odróżnieniu barszczu Sosnowskiego od barszczu Mantegazziego dokładna liczba stanowisk tego gatunku nie jest znana, jednak z bazy stanowisk Zespołu ekspertów Barszcz.edu.pl notującej łącznie zgłoszenia miejsc występowania barszczu Sosnowskiego i barszczu Mantegazziego wynika, że rośliny te prawdopodobnie występują w każdym województwie.  Brak szczegółowych informacji odnośnie powierzchni zajmowanej przez gatunek, czy liczebności populacji, jednak notowana liczba stanowisk wciąż wzrasta.

addInfoInspections:
Kontrola na podstawie analizy sprawozdania z realizacji zezwolenia. Termin złożenia sprawozdania upływa 10 stycznia 2020 r.

addInfoPermits:
Zezwolenie na przetrzymywanie nasion pozyskanych z roślin ze stanowisk naturalnych w celu przeprowadzenia badań naukowych.


IDspecies: 7
IDreport: PT-2015-2018
country: PT
EASINCode: R05440
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pt/eu/ias/envyz_mka
addInfoSpecies:
Since 1974, the import, cultivation, multiplication, sale, transport or detention of Eichhornia crassipes is prohibited in Portugal (Decreto nº 165/74, of 22 April). There were several projects that aimed to control the species. With the publication of Decreto-Lei No. 565/99, of December 21, the species was classified as invasive.
Present in the hydrographic basins of the rivers Tejo, Guadiana, Vouga, Cávado, Ave, Sado and Mira.
Azores: Flores, Faial, Graciosa, Terceira e S. Miguel

commonNameNational:
Baroneza;jacinto-aquático ;aguapé;Camalote;Mururé;Pareci;Rainha-dos-lagos ; Jacinto-d'água; Pavoa;jacinto-de-água; jacinto-aquático


IDspecies: 10
IDreport: PT-2015-2018
country: PT
EASINCode: R06923
commonNameNational: gigante
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pt/eu/ias/envyz_mka
addInfoSpecies:
No evidence of new entries and spread in the Portuguese Mainland. Evidence of natural dispersal in Azores islands.


IDspecies: 16
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R07719
commonNameNational: niecierpek gruczołowaty
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Niecierpek gruczołowaty został wprowadzony do Polski jako roślina ozdobna i miododajna pod koniec XIX wieku. Pierwsze stwierdzenia gatunku poza uprawą, na obszarze Polski w obecnych granicach, pochodzą z terenu Dolnego Śląska, z roku 1890. Kolejne stanowiska, do połowy XX w., również pojawiały się głównie w południowo-zachodniej części kraju. W drugiej połowie XX w., kiedy niecierpek gruczołowaty stał się popularną rośliną miododajną oraz elementem ogródków przydomowych, jego stanowisk zaczęło szybko przybywać – najwięcej w części południowej, a w rozproszeniu także w innych regionach kraju. Najmniej stanowisk znanych było z północno wschodniej Polski, jednak obszar ten zaczął być szybko kolonizowany przez gatunek po 2000 r. Poza uprawę niecierpek gruczołowaty łatwo się wydostał w drodze autochorii – rozrzucania nasion podczas gwałtownego pękania owoców. Do środowiska przyrodniczego przedostał się także razem z zawierającymi jego nasiona odpadami z ogrodów, zwłaszcza, jeśli odpady te trafiały na obrzeża wód. Zasiedlenie brzegów rzek i strumieni zapewniło niecierpkowi gruczołowatemu możliwość transportu nasion z materiałem wleczonym po dnie cieków, a tym samym efektywne rozprzestrzenianie na znaczne odległości. Celowe wprowadzanie niecierpka gruczołowatego, jako rośliny ozdobnej i miododajnej miało decydujące znaczenie dla jego rozprzestrzenienia.
Niecierpek gruczołowaty jest obecnie w Polsce szeroko rozprzestrzeniony, występuje we wszystkich województwach, jakkolwiek rozmieszczenie jego stanowisk nie jest równomierne. Zdecydowanie częściej spotyka się go w południowej, niż w północnej części kraju. Dane umieszczone na mapie nie w pełni odzwierciedlają sytuację gatunku w kraju - z jednej strony ilustrują duże nagromadzenie stanowisk, np. w rejonie Wigierskiego Parku Narodowego, wynikające z prowadzenia intensywnych badań nad gatunkami inwazyjnymi, z drugiej strony - brak stanowisk w niektórych regionach kraju może, przynajmniej częściowo, wynikać z braku odpowiedniego rozpoznania sytuacji na ich terenie. Porównanie liczby stanowisk gatunku z roku 2005, z obecnie znanymi wskazuje na znaczy wzrost ich liczby. Należy zatem przypuszczać, że inwazja niecierpka gruczołowatego będzie dalej postępować.

addInfoInspections:
Kontrola na podstawie analizy sprawozdania z realizacji zezwolenia. Termin złożenia sprawozdania upływa 10 stycznia 2020 r.

addInfoPermits:
Zezwolenie na przetrzymywanie nasion pozyskanych z roślin ze stanowisk naturalnych w celu przeprowadzenia badań naukowych.


IDspecies: 21
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R08915
commonNameNational: tulejnik amerykański
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Pierwsze doniesienia o uprawie Lysichiton americanus pochodzą z lat 30. XX w. Więcej informacji o uprawie w ogrodach botanicznych i arboretach pojawia się od lat 90. XX w. W Polsce nie sprzyja tulejnikowi narastająca od zachodu ku wschodowi kontynentalizacja klimatu: malejąca wilgotność powietrza (uszkodzenia liści), kontrasty termiczne w ciągu roku (przemarzanie kłącza zimą), niskie temperatury wiosenne (zagrażające siewkom). Niewykluczona jest też mniejsza efektywność procesu zapylania i rozsiewania.


IDspecies: 24
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R09720
commonNameNational: nutria
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Informacje o występowaniu nutrii w Polsce w środowisku przyrodniczym są sporadyczne. Od 1980 roku, kiedy takie dane są zbierane do "Atlasu ssaków Polski" wykazano tylko kilka takich przypadków. Były to najczęściej obserwacje pojedynczych osobników, rzadziej - grup rodzinnych. Obserwacje te nie powtórzyły się w tych samych lokalizacjach w kolejnych latach, stąd wniosek, że obserwowane osobniki nie przeżyły, gdyż dla nutrii krytyczne są ciężkie zimowe warunki. Wydaje się, że mogą to być osobniki, które zbiegły z hodowli, ewentualnie takie, które zostały celowo uwolnione. 


IDspecies: 27
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R09857
commonNameNational: koati
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Gatunek nie jest zadomowiony w Polsce. Odnotowano jedynie dwa przypadki obserwacji koati w środowisku przyrodniczym: 3-4 osobniki koło Krakowa jesienią 2008 roku oraz w Warszawie w 2014 roku. Obydwa przypadki były najprawdopodobniej wynikiem ucieczek lub celowych uwolnień z hodowli.


IDspecies: 28
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R10336
commonNameNational: piżmak
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Piżmak jest w Polsce gatunkiem szeroko rozprzestrzenionym, ale obecnie ustępującym. W latach 20. XX wieku rozpoczęto w Polsce hodowlę fermową, z przeznaczeniem na futra, a uciekinierzy z ferm zasilali dziko żyjącą populację. W latach 30. XX wieku wprowadzono zakaz hodowli, po ich likwidacji piżmak rozprzestrzeniał się na drodze naturalnej. Do końca lat 50. ubiegłego wieku piżmak zasiedlił już prawie cały kraj, z wyjątkiem najwyższych partii gór. Od lat 80. XX wieku populacja piżmaka w Polsce zaczęła spadać. Gatunek uznawany jest za ustępujący, ponieważ mimo szerokiego rozprzestrzenienia przez ostatnie 25 lat wykazywał tendencje spadkowe.


IDspecies: 29
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R10443
commonNameNational: rak pręgowany; rak amerykański
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Gatunek występuje niemal w całym kraju. Jedynie Polska południowo-wschodnia oraz Karpaty wydają się być wolne od jego występowania. W terenach podgórskich wiarygodne dane o jego występowaniu pochodzą jedynie ze Zbiornika Dobczyckiego. Zasadniczo gatunek stwierdzony we wszystkich większych zlewniach w Polsce, w tym w zlewni Odry, Wisły, Bugu, Narwi, Pilicy, Nidy, Warty. Zajmuje również pojezierza gdzie jest pospolitym gatunkiem. Istnieją również obserwacje gatunku z przybrzeżnych wód Bałtyku.
W 1890 roku sprowadzono ze Stanów Zjednoczonych do Polski 100 osobników raków pręgowanych, które wypuszczono do niewielkiego (100 m2) stawu w Barnówku (obecnie woj. zachodniopomorskie). Następnie gatunek był wielokrotnie wsiedlany na nowe stanowiska, jednocześnie dokonywał też spontanicznej ekspansji. W połowie XX wieku jego zasięg obejmował ok. 1/3 kraju. Obecnie zajmuje on większość terytorium Polski. W ostatnich 20 latach tempo ekspansji nieco spadło, co wynika głównie z faktu skolonizowania już większości kraju i braku odpowiednich do zasiedlenia wód na południu kraju (wydaje się, że gatunek unika bystrych i chłodnych podgórskich i górskich strumieni i rzek). Mimo tego, obserwuje się dalsze zwiększanie zasięgu w kierunku południowym.

addInfoInspections:
Kontrola na podstawie analizy sprawozdania z realizacji zezwolenia. Zgodnie ze sprawozdaniami zezwolenia zostały już częściowo wykorzystane.

addInfoPermits:
Zezwolenia na przetrzymywanie w celu przeprowadzenia badań naukowych dotyczących biologii gatunku, w tym w zakresie morfologii i zachowań behawioralnych. Osobniki będą odłowione ze środowiska naturalnego. 


IDspecies: 16
IDreport: LU-2015-2018
country: LU
EASINCode: R07719
commonNameNational: Drüse-Sprangkraut
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lu/eu/ias/envxnmqqg
addInfoSpecies:
This species is believed to be widely spread all over the country, namely where it was observed before 2015, so the observations before 2015 were kept in the distribution map.


IDspecies: 31
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R10652
commonNameNational: sterniczka jamajska
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
W Polsce pierwsza obserwacja tego gatunku miała miejsce w 2005 r., choć należy wspomnieć, że w 1997 r. obserwowany był samiec będący hybrydą sterniczki jamajskiej i rodzimej sterniczki. Sterniczka jamajska pojawia się w środowisku przyrodniczym Polski jedynie sporadycznie, nie rozmnaża się, do tej pory zanotowano kilkanaście pojedynczych stwierdzeń tego gatunku, m. in. w województwie pomorskim, zachodnio-pomorskim i śląskim. Sterniczka jamajska jest gatunkiem bardzo mobilnym. Zachowanie obserwowanych ptaków wskazuje, że były to osobniki dzikie, a nie zbiegłe z niewoli, zatem z dużym prawdopodobieństwem przyleciały do Polski z Europy Zachodniej.


IDspecies: 32
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R10676
commonNameNational: rak sygnałowy; rak kalifornijski
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Rak sygnałowy występuje na kilkudziesięciu stanowiskach w północnej Polsce, w różnego typu zbiornikach i ciekach wodnych, od dużych jezior po stawy oraz od małych strumyków po wielkie rzeki. Został introdukowany do wód polskich w 1971 roku jako gatunek mający zastąpić wymarłego wskutek epidemii dżumy raka szlachetnego. Do połowy lat 90 XX wieku był obiektem badań w Instytucie Rybactwa Śródlądowego w Olsztynie i przetrzymywany w obiektach Pracowni Rybactwa Jeziorowego w Pieczarkach koło Giżycka. Stąd pochodzi materiał większości introdukcji tego gatunku w Polsce. Drugim źródłem raków sygnałowych była introdukcja do jeziora Krzywy Róg w otulinie Drawieńskiego Parku Narodowego z wykorzystaniem osobników przywiezionych bezpośrednio ze Szwecji. W ostatnich latach zaobserwowano wzrost tempa rozprzestrzeniania się raka sygnałowego na terenie Pomorza Środkowego. Rak sygnałowy jest bardzo atrakcyjnym gatunkiem z hodowlanego punktu widzenia. Wysoka jakość cech użytkowych takich jak duże rozmiary ciała i potężne szczypce powodują, że jest to gatunek chętnie przenoszony przez potencjalnych hodowców i użytkowników rybackich wód. Gatunek bardzo łatwo adaptuje się do warunków występujących w wodach polskich i wykazuje dużą zdolność migracyjną. Wydaje się też, że większość znanych stanowisk to raczej efekt nielegalnych wsiedleń, nie zaś spontanicznej ekspansji.


IDspecies: 33
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R10890
commonNameNational: partenium ambrozjowate
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Parthenium hysterophorus współcześnie w Polsce nie występuje. Obserwowany był w Polsce tylko przed II wojną światową. G. Wangrin stwierdził jego występowanie w 1938 roku na wysypisku w Szczecinie, gdzie obserwował tylko kilka roślin. Rok później obecność gatunku potwierdzono, przy czym odnotowano obecność tylko jednej rośliny. W literaturze przedmiotu brak informacji o innych stanowiskach Parthenium hysterophorus w Polsce.


IDspecies: 34
IDreport: PL-2015-2018
country: PL
EASINCode: R03000
commonNameNational: rozplenica szczecinkowata
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pl/eu/ias/envxnpwsa
addInfoSpecies:
Gatunek nie jest w stanie przetrwać okresu zimowego (roślina niezabezpieczona przemarza w temperaturach poniżej 0°C).


IDspecies: 13
IDreport: LV-2015-2018
country: LV
EASINCode: R07252
commonNameNational: Sosnovska latvānis
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexualAndAsexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lv/eu/ias/envxhoog
addInfoSpecies:
Spreads also - electricity power lines, gas piplines, roads, railways, firebreaks 
http://karte.vaad.gov.lv/, https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/HERSO/distribution/LV, https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/HERSO/documents


IDspecies: 24
IDreport: LU-2015-2018
country: LU
EASINCode: R09720
commonNameNational: Biwerrat
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lu/eu/ias/envxnmqqg
addInfoSpecies:
For the distribution map, the data of the site in the south of the country (Remerschen) were taken out, since the species was eradicated in that site. 

In the other sites, those were casual records, following a monitoring the species could not be observed anymore. We could consider that the species is absent of LU, in that case the distribution map should not be considered. 


IDspecies: 0
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R00644
addInfoPermits: The permit was issued to the Lithuanian Zoo.
commonNameNational: egiptinė žąsis
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje egiptinė žąsis sutinkama labai retai.  Pirmą kartą šalyje ji stebėta 2002 m. Kuršių mariose. Vėliau stebėta dar tris kartus – Biržų r. ir Kaune. Vienas iš šių paukščių, tikėtina, buvo pasprukęs iš nelaisvės, kiti, manoma, savaime užklydę iš kaimyninių šalių. Labiausiai tikėtinas plitimo kelias Lietuvoje – iš nelaisvės pabėgusių ar paleistų paukščių įsitvirtinimas gamtoje. Kadangi gretimose šalyse jau yra įsikūrusios laisvėje gyvenančios populiacijos, įmanomas ir laukinių paukščių savaiminis plitimas į Lietuvą. Dauginimasis Lietuvoje gamtos sąlygomis neužregistruotas, pastovių populiacijų nėra.


IDspecies: 1
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R00669
commonNameNational: siauralapė alstė
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Rūšies galimybės įsitvirtinti ir daugintis Lietuvoje netirtos, tačiau, sprendžiant pagal biologines savybes, ji beveik neturi galimybių natūralizuotis ir išplisti. Lietuvos klimato sąlygos šiai rūšiai visiškai nepalankios.


IDspecies: 2
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R01529
commonNameNational: sirinis klemalis
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: asexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje gana reta, netolygiai paplitusi rūšis, dažnesnė pietinėje ir rytinėje dalyse. Buvo auginama želdynuose ir iš jų sulaukėjo. Dauginasi ir plinta vegetatyviniu būdu, duomenų apie generatyvinį dauginimąsi nėra, bet jis galimas. 
Želdynuose buvo gana retai auginamas dekoratyviniais tikslais arba kaip nektaringas augalas. Subrandina sėklas, bet dauginimasis jomis ir plitimas netirtas.


IDspecies: 3
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R01830
commonNameNational: pajūrinė varva
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje rūšis gamtoje nebuvo užregistruota ir nėra duomenų, kad būtų buvusi auginama. Rūšies įsitvirtinimo ir dauginimosi galimybės Lietuvoje nevertintos.


IDspecies: 4
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R02476
commonNameNational: paprastasis labūstras
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje gamtoje rūšis neužregistruota. Anksčiau augalais buvo prekiaujama akvariumistikos parduotuvėse, jais keitėsi akvariumų mėgėjai. Rūšies galimybės įsitvirtinti ir daugintis Lietuvoje netirtos, bet klimato sąlygos palankios, todėl galėtų išplisti, natūralizuotis ir tapti invazine. 


IDspecies: 5
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R02573
commonNameNational: Palaso voverė
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje gamtinėmis sąlygomis iki šiol neužregistruota. Duomenų apie auginimą dirbtinėmis sąlygomis nėra. Klimato sąlygos šalyje yra palankios rūšiai įsitvirtinti. Kol kas labai maža tikimybė, kad artimiausiu metu į Lietuvą šios rūšies voverės galėtų savaime paplisti iš kitų kraštų, kur jos yra invazinės.


IDspecies: 6
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R04121
commonNameNational: indinė varna
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje ši rūšis nėra registruota. Rūšis aptinkama kitose Europos šalyse, todėl yra tikimybė, kad gali savaime atskristi. Tikimybė, kad šie paukščiai galėtų sudaryti pastovias populiacijas, yra maža.


IDspecies: 7
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R05440
commonNameNational: paprastoji eichornija
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje šios rūšies augalų gamtoje kol kas neužregistruota. Anksčiau retai augino akvariumų mėgėjai. Rūšies galimybės įsitvirtinti ir daugintis Lietuvoje netirtos, tačiau sprendžiant pagal rūšies biologiją, galimybių jai įsitvirtinti šalyje nėra.


IDspecies: 8
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R05501
commonNameNational: suktalapė elodėja
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje šios rūšies augalų gamtoje kol kas neužregistruota. Anksčiau suktalapėmis elodėjomis buvo prekiaujama akvariumistikos parduotuvėse ir jais keitėsi akvariumų mėgėjai. Yra didelė tikimybė, kad ši rūšis gali patekti į Lietuvą, natūralizuotis ir tapti invazine. 


IDspecies: 9
IDreport: AT-2015-2018
country: AT
EASINCode: R05836
commonNameNational: Wollhandkrabbe
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: notReproducing
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/at/eu/ias/envxktktw
addInfoSpecies:
Answer d) is given with a high amount on uncertainty. In fact, the entry pathway into Austria is unknown.


IDspecies: 16
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R07719
commonNameNational: bitinė sprigė
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje rūšis paplitusi visoje Lietuvos teritorijoje, bet netolygiai. Dažnesnė ir gausesnė šiaurės rytinėje, rytinėje ir pietinėje Lietuvos dalyse, kitur užregistruotos labiau ar mažiau izoliuotos populiacijos. Sparčiai plinta upių ir upelių slėniais, todėl realus paplitimas gali būti didesnis. Bitinės sprigės taip pat aptinkamos pamiškėse, dykvietėse, šalia sodybų, kapinių, sąvartynų. Jos neretai įsikuria aliuviniuose miškuose. Dauginasi ir plinta sėklomis, kurias dažniausiai išnešioja vanduo, atsitiktinai išplatina žmonės, transporto priemonės.
Rūšies populiacijose stebimos gana reikšmingos fluktuacijos: individų tankumas sumažėja kas 3–5 metai, bet paskui jos vėl grįžta į pradinę būseną arba dar labiau padidėja. Duomenų apie sėkmingai išnaikintas gamtinėse buveinėse buvusias populiacijas kol kas nėra. Antropogeninėse buveinėse augalai išnaikinami per 2–3 metus, nes nesuformuoja ilgalaikio sėklų banko.


IDspecies: 17
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R08062
commonNameNational: didysis vandrūnėlis
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje šios rūšies augalų gamtoje kol kas neužregistruota. Augalas anksčiau buvo auginamas akvariumuose, todėl yra tikimybė, kad galėjo atsitiktinai patekti į natūralius vandenis. Lietuvos klimato sąlygos šiai rūšiai augti ir natūralizuotis yra tinkamos. Būtini tyrimai, siekiant nustatyti, ar rūšis nėra paplitusi šalyje. Ypač svarbu ištirti urbanizuotų teritorijų vandens telkinius.


IDspecies: 18
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R08679
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje gamtoje neaptinkama. Duomenų apie nelaisvėje laikomas jautines varles šalyje nėra. Lietuvos klimato sąlygos rūšiai tinkamos, todėl patekusios į laisvę jautinės varlės galėtų išgyventi ir sukurti pastovias populiacijas.


IDspecies: 19
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R17663
commonNameNational: stambiažiedė liudvigija
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje šios rūšies augalų gamtoje nebuvo neužregistruota, taip pat nėra duomenų, kad rūšis būtų auginama dirbtinėmis sąlygomis. Lietuvos klimato sąlygos rūšiai yra nepalankios ir tikimybė šios rūšies augalams įsitvirtinti bei plisti šalyje yra labai maža.


IDspecies: 20
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R08830
commonNameNational: gulsčioji liudvigija
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje šios rūšies augalų gamtoje nebuvo neužregistruota, taip pat nėra duomenų, kad rūšis būtų auginama želdynuose. Rūšies galimybės įsitvirtinti ir daugintis Lietuvoje netirtos, tačiau galima daryti prielaidą, kad tikimybė augalams įsitvirtinti ir plisti Lietuvoje yra labai maža. 


IDspecies: 21
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R08915
commonNameNational: amerikinis dvokūnas
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje šios rūšies augalų gamtoje neužregistruota. Nėra patikimos informacijos, kad amerikiniai dvokūnai Lietuvoje auginami dekoratyviniuose želdiniuose, bet anksčiau jų šakniastiebiais buvo prekiaujama gėlių parduotuvėse. Didžiausia tikimybė aptikti sulaukėjusius augalus yra miškai ir kitos šlapynės šalia miestų ir gyvenviečių.Rūšis Lietuvoje galėtų natūralizuotis ir plisti.


IDspecies: 22
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R09459
commonNameNational: lanksčioji stypnė
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje šios rūšies augalų gamtoje neaptikta. Nėra duomenų, kad jie būtų auginami želdynuose. Tikimybė, kad rūšis galėtų įsitvirtinti Lietuvoje, labai maža. 


IDspecies: 23
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R09640
addInfoPermits: Leidimas išduotas Lietuvos zoologijos sodui.
commonNameNational: kininis muntjakas
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje gamtinėmis sąlygomis rūšis iki šiol neužregistruota. Žinoma, kad jų buvo laikoma aptvaruose. Jeigu sulaukėtų, būtų gana didelė tikimybė rūšiai Lietuvoje įsitvirtinti, nes ji prisitaikė gyventi vidutinio klimato juostos regionuose. Kol kas labai maža tikimybė, kad artimiausiu metu į Lietuvą šios rūšies gyvūnai galėtų savaime paplisti iš kitų kraštų, kur jie yra invaziniai.


IDspecies: 24
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R09720
commonNameNational: nutrija
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje gamtinėmis sąlygomis rūšis iki šiol neužregistruota. Anksčiau buvo auginama dėl kailio. Dabar duomenų apie auginimą nėra. Šalies gamtinės sąlygos palankios nutrijoms peržiemoti.


IDspecies: 25
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R18934
commonNameNational: stambioji plunksnalapė
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje gamtoje šių augalų nebuvo aptikta. Sprendžiant pagal rūšies biologijos savybes, rūšis gali įsitvirtinti Lietuvoje. Anksčiau šios rūšies augalais buvo prekiaujama, jie auginti akvariumuose. Didelė tikimybė, kad šios rūšies augalų gali būti aptikta urbanizuotų teritorijų vandens telkiniuose. Būtini išsamūs tyrimai. 


IDspecies: 26
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R09747
commonNameNational: kaičioji plunksnalapė
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje gamtoje šių augalų nebuvo aptikta. Anksčiau augalais buvo prekiaujama ir jie auginti mėgėjų akvariumuose. Rūšis Lietuvoje gali įsitvirtinti, nes klimato sąlygos yra palankios. Didelė tikimybė, kad šios rūšies augalų gali būti aptikta urbanizuotų teritorijų vandens telkiniuose. Būtini išsamūs tyrimai.


IDspecies: 27
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R09857
addInfoPermits: Leidimas išduotas Lietuvos zoologijos sodui.
commonNameNational: paprastasis koatis
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje gamtinėmis sąlygomis rūšis iki šiol neužregistruota. Šalies gamtinės sąlygos paprastiesiems koačiams žiemoti nepalankios, todėl labai maža tikimybė, kad šalyje jie galėtų įsitvirtinti.


IDspecies: 28
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R10336
commonNameNational: ondatra
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Rūšis paplitusi visoje Lietuvoje, bet netolygiai. Kiek retesnė šiaurinėje ir vakarinėje šalies dalyse. Lietuvoje per metus veda 2–3 vadas, vadoje po 4–7 jauniklius. Nėštumo trukmė 25–26 dienos. Patelės subręsta per 4–5 mėnesius, patinai vėliau. Gyvena vandens telkinių pakrantėse: paežerėse, lėtai tekančių upių, griovių, tvenkinių, senvagių krantuose, pelkučių pakraščiuose. Rausia urvus arba stato trobeles.
XX a. aštuntame dešimtmetyje Lietuvoje buvo apie 40 000 ondatrų, vėliau sumažėjo. Dabar Lietuvoje apskaitos nevykdomos, bet ekspertinio vertinimo būdu nustatyta, kad gyvena apie 2000 individų. Kasmet sumedžiojama mažiau kaip po 100 individų.


IDspecies: 29
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R10443
commonNameNational: rainuotasis vėžys
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Rainuotieji vėžiai paplitę beveik visoje teritorijoje, išskyrus šiaurrytinę dalį. Daugelyje vietovių šie vėžiai gausūs arba labai gausūs. Lengvai dauginasi, subrendusios patelės gali padėti daugiau kaip 500 ikrų. Kai kuriose vietose rūšis galėjo būti neteisėtai introdukuota, bet daugelyje vietų ji atsirado dėl savaiminio plitimo iš Lenkijos, kur ji jau anksčiau tapusi invazine. 
Sunaikindamas europinių vėžių išteklius, rainuotasis vėžys daro ekologinę ir ekonominę žalą. 


IDspecies: 30
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R10445
commonNameNational: šiurkštusis vėžys
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje šiurktusis vėžys kol kas neužregistruotas. Nėra duomenų apie jų auginimą akvariumuose ar kitomis dirbtinėmis sąlygomis. Rūšies galimybės įsitvirtinti ir daugintis Lietuvoje netirtos, tačiau galima teigti, kad šalies klimato sąlygos šiai rūšiai gyventi yra palankios. Kol kas neaptiktas kaimyninėse šalyse, todėl tikimybė, kad į Lietuvą pateks savaime, kol kas nedidelė.


IDspecies: 31
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R10652
commonNameNational: baltaskruostė stačiauodegė
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje ši rūšis nėra registruota. Kadangi paukščiai neretai laikomi paukščių kolekcijose ne ES šalyse, yra tikimybė Lietuvoje, kad iš jų pasprukę paukščiai galėtų užklysti. Tikimybė, kad galėtų susidaryti pastovios populiacijos, labai maža. 


IDspecies: 32
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R10676
commonNameNational: žymėtasis vėžys
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Dabar Lietuvoje žymėtieji vėžiai aptinkami rytinėje šalies dalyje ir toliau plinta visomis kryptimis. Žymėtieji vėžiai šalyje buvo introdukuoti 1972 m. į kelis izoliuotus ežerus. Vėliau jie buvo neteisėtai perkelti į kelis kitus ežerus. Plinta vandentakiais, tačiau gana lėtai. Kiaušinius deda rudenį, jaunikliai ritasi nuo balandžio pabaigos iki vėlyvos pabaigos. Padeda 100–400, kartais iki 500 ikrų. Įsikuria greitos tėkmėse vandenyse, taip pat ežeruose, tvenkiniuose, karjeruose.


IDspecies: 33
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R10890
commonNameNational: vėlyvoji gvajulė
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje šios rūšies augalų gamtoje neužregistruota, nėra duomenų, kad rūšis būtų auginama želdynuose. Augalo sėklų galėtų patekti atsitiktinai su kitais augalais ar jų žaliavomis. Rūšies galimybės įsitvirtinti ir daugintis Lietuvoje netirtos. Dėl klimato sąlygų, yra tik nedidelė tikimybė šios rūšies augalams įsitvirtinti ir plisti Lietuvoje.


IDspecies: 34
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R03000
commonNameNational: šeriuotoji soruolė
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Šeriuotosios soruolės Lietuvoje gamtoje kol kas neužregistruotos, tačiau jos buvo ir iki šiol kartais auginamos dekoratyviniuose miestų, gyvenviečių ir privačiuose želdynuose. Subrandina gyvybingas sėklas, todėl yra tikimybė, kad gali išplisti iš želdynų. Rūšis Lietuvoje gali natūralizuotis ir tapti invazine. Būtini nuolatiniai tyrimai urbanizuotose teritorijose ir jų aplinkoje, siekiant nustatyti, ar rūšis neplinta.


IDspecies: 35
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R11034
commonNameNational: nuodėgulinis grundalas
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje rūšis paplitusi vidurinėje, rytinėje, pietinėje ir pietrytinėje šalies dalyse, bet netolygiai. Iš viso užregistruota daugiau kaip 70 vandens telkinių (kūdrose, tvenkiniuose, nedideliuose ežeruose), o Vilniaus apskrityje pavienių individų pasitaiko ir kai kuriose Vilniaus upėse. Dauguma radimo vietų koncentruojasi aplink urbanizuotas teritorijas. Daugumoje vietovių grundalai buvo neteisėtai introdukuoti arba pateko atsitiktinai, kai buvo naudojami jaukui. Dabar plinta savaime, tačiau šis plitimas lėtas, nes upės šioms žuvims nepalankios buveinės. Vidutinis vislumas – apie 2000 ikrų. Neršia porcijomis, per du tris kartus, kas 14–20 dienų. Ikrus deda ant bet kokio substrato: smėlio, akmenų, povandeninių augalų.
Minta tik gyvūninės kilmės maistu. Tipiškas plėšrūnas, grobio tyko pakibęs vandens storymėje. Naikina ir varliagyvių ikrus bei lervas. Atsparus deguonies trūkumui ir nepalankioms aplinkos sąlygoms: sugeba išgyventi žiemą iki pat dugno įšąlančiuose, o vasarą – išdžiūstančiuose vandens telkiniuose, kuriuose kitų rūšių žuvys neišgyvena. 


IDspecies: 36
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R19287
commonNameNational: raizgusis rūgtis
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje rūšis gamtoje nebuvo užregistruota, taip pat nėra duomenų, kad ji būtų auginama želdynuose. Sprendžiant pagal rūšies ekologinius poreikius, biologines savybes ir klimato sąlygų poreikį, galima teigti, kad rūšis Lietuvoje galėtų įsitvirtinti ir plisti.


IDspecies: 37
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R12250
commonNameNational: Klarko vėžys
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje Klarko vėžys gamtoje kol kas nerastas, nėra patikimų duomenų apie jų auginimą pramoniniu būdu, tačiau yra tikimybė, kad buvo ir iki šiol kartais auginami privačiuose akvariumuose. Dėl to išlieka neteisėtos introdukcijos į gamtinius vandens telkinius tikimybė. Rūšies galimybės įsitvirtinti ir daugintis Lietuvoje netirtos. Žinoma, kad rūšis gali išgyventi ir daugintis užšalančiuose vandens telkiniuose, todėl Lietuvos klimato sąlygos potencialiai gali būti tinkamos šiam vėžiui. Labai maža tikimybė, kad artimiausiu metu šie vėžiai į Lietuvą galėtų paplisti savaime iš kitų kraštų, kur jie yra invaziniai. 


IDspecies: 38
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R17660
commonNameNational: Marmurinis vėžys
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje marmurinis vėžys gamtinėse buveinėse kol kas nerastas, nėra duomenų apie jų auginimą pramoniniais tikslais. Esama informacijos, kad kai kurie akvariumų mėgėjai šiuos vėžius augino namuose, todėl yra neteisėtos introdukcijos į gamtinius vandens telkinius tikimybė. Šių vėžių galimybės įsitvirtinti ir daugintis Lietuvos gamtinėmis sąlygomis netirtos, tačiau sprendžiant pagal biologines savybes, jie galėtų išgyventi ir suformuoti pastovią populiaciją. Labai maža tikimybė, kad artimiausiu metu šie vėžiai į Lietuvą galėtų paplisti savaime iš kitų kraštų, kur jie yra invaziniai.


IDspecies: 39
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R12260
addInfoPermits: Leidimas išduotas Lietuvos zoologijos sodui.
commonNameNational: paprastasis meškėnas
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Nuo 2010 m. Lietuvoje paprastieji meškėnai užregistruoti Rokiškio, Šilutės, Varėnos r., Kazlų Rūdos sav. Pavieniai individai kartais stebimas Kuršių nerijoje (Neringos miesto savivaldybė). Stebėti individai sugaunami, sumedžiojami arba randamos jų gaišenos ant kelių. Tikslus rūšies paplitimas ir populiacijos dydis šalyje nežinomi. Patvirtinta, kad Kuršių nerijoje buvo vienas dauginimosi atvejis. Nuo 2010 m. stebėta apie 30 meškėnų individų. Manoma, kad į Lietuvą paprastieji meškėnai pateko iš Lenkijos per Kaliningrado sritį (Rusija), taip pat gali būti, kad jie migruoja iš Baltarusijos teritorijos, tačiau šis migracijos kelias nepatvirtintas. 


IDspecies: 40
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R12451
commonNameNational: rytinis gružlelis
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje rūšis aptikta 2008 m. keliose Žemaitijos nacionalinio parko teritorijoje esančiose privačiose kūdrose. Į šalies vandens telkinius pateko dėl atsitiktinės introdukcijos, kartu su dirbtinai veisiamų amūrų ir plačiakakčių jaunikliais. Tikėtina, kad rytinio gružlelio plitimą Lietuvos vandenyse riboja nepalankios klimato sąlygos, tačiau, kintant klimatui, savarankiško plitimo tikimybė didėja. Didžiausia tikimybė rūšiai patekti iš Vyslos baseino upių. Nustatyta, kad rytiniai gružleliai Lietuvoje dauginasi, tačiau išsamios informacijos apie dauginimosi intensyvumą nėra. 
Nepatvirtintais duomenimis, 2010 m. registruotos rytinio gružlelio populiacijos dabar išnykusios.


IDspecies: 41
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R12644
commonNameNational: kalninės puerarijos skiautarėtasis varietetas
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje šios rūšies augalų gamtoje kol kas neužregistruota. Nėra duomenų, kad augalas būtų auginamas želdynuose. Duomenų apie prekybą augalais, jų daigais arba sėklomis nėra. Rūšies galimybės įsitvirtinti ir daugintis Lietuvoje netirtos, tačiau yra nedidelė tikimybė, kad šie augalai šalyje galėtų įsitvirtinti ir plisti.


IDspecies: 42
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R13698
commonNameNational: pilkoji voverė
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje gamtinėmis sąlygomis rūšis iki šiol neužregistruota. Šalies gamtinės sąlygos pilkosioms voverėms gyventi yra visiškai palankios, todėl yra labai didelė tikimybė, kad, patekimo atveju, šalyje galėtų įsitvirtinti. Duomenų apie auginimą nelaisvėje nėra. Gretimose valstybėse rūšis kol kas neužregistruota.


IDspecies: 43
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R19317
commonNameNational: juodoji voverė
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje gamtoje rūšis iki šiol neužregistruota. Šalies gamtinės sąlygos juodosioms voverėms gyventi yra visiškai palankios. Jeigu patektų į šalį, yra labai didelė tikimybė, kad galėtų įsitvirtinti ir tapti invazine. Duomenų apie auginimą nelaisvėje nėra. Gretimose valstybėse rūšis kol kas neužregistruota.


IDspecies: 44
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R14882
commonNameNational: sibirinis burundukas
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: false
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje gamtoje rūšis iki šiol neužregistruota. Šalies gamtinės sąlygos sibiriniams burundukams gyventi yra visiškai palankios. Patekus auginamiems burundukams į laisvę, būtų labai didelė jų natūralizacijos ir invazijos tikimybė. Anksčiau gyvūnais buvo dažnai prekiaujama ir neretai auginti namuose. Kaimyninėse su Lietuva šalyse rūšis taip pat kol kas neužregistruota.


IDspecies: 45
IDreport: LT-2015-2018
country: LT
EASINCode: R15136
addInfoPermits: The permit was issued to the Lithuanian Zoo.
commonNameNational: šventasis ibis
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/lt/eu/ias/envxnqy6w
addInfoSpecies:
Lietuvoje šventasis ibis iki šiol registruotas tik 1986 m. – vienas individas stebėtas Žuvinto ir Simno ežeruose. Manoma, kad tai buvo iš nelaisvės pabėgęs paukštis. Savaiminis šios rūšies išplitimas į Lietuvą mažai tikėtinas. Rūšies įsitvirtinimas ir pastovių populiacijų susidarymas šalyje turi mažą tikimybę.


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: AT-2015-2018
country: AT
EASINCode: R18154
commonNameNational: Nordamerikanische Schmuckschildkröte
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/at/eu/ias/envxktktw
addInfoSpecies:
Es wurden mehrfach Einzel-Brutnachweise in Österreich beobachtet, eine regelmäßige Reproduktion der Art wird für die Zukunft erwartet. Several single brood records were observed in Austria, a regular reproduction of the species is expected in the future


IDspecies: 2
IDreport: FI-2015-2018
country: FI
EASINCode: R01529
commonNameNational: mesisilkkiyrtti
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: unclear
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fi/eu/ias/envxs8imw
addInfoSpecies:
The species has been sold as a garden plant before the legislation came into force. A few garden locations are known at present.


IDspecies: 7
IDreport: FI-2015-2018
country: FI
EASINCode: R05440
commonNameNational: kellusvesihyasintti
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fi/eu/ias/envxs8imw
addInfoSpecies:
The species has been sold in garden shops before the legislation came into force, thus it is possible that it still exists in some garden ponds in Finland.


IDspecies: 11
IDreport: FI-2015-2018
country: FI
EASINCode: R07248
commonNameNational: kaukasianjättiputki
eradicationMeasures: false
noInspections: true
permitsIssued: true
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fi/eu/ias/envxs8imw
addInfoSpecies:
Heracleum specimens that could not be identified to species level are marked as Heracleum spp. All Heracleum spp. marked observations are included in the reporting of Heracleum mantegazzianum. Earlier reported observations on H. sosnowskyi are also included to Heracleum spp. as the present knowledge is that H. sosnowskyi does not occur in Finland.  

addInfoPermits:
Link to the permit: https://vieraslajit.fi/sites/default/files/AVI_lupa_allekirjoitettu-THyv%C3%B6nen_0.pdf#overlay-context=fi/content/tiedostojen-uploadsivu


IDspecies: 12
IDreport: FI-2015-2018
country: FI
EASINCode: R07250
commonNameNational: persianjättiputki
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fi/eu/ias/envxs8imw
addInfoSpecies:
H. persicum observations are not all verified, part of them are reported to the national portal by general public.


IDspecies: 13
IDreport: FI-2015-2018
country: FI
EASINCode: R07252
commonNameNational: armenianjättiputki
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fi/eu/ias/envxs8imw
addInfoSpecies:
Piirainen & Saarinen 2018. Does Heracleum  sosnowskyi occur in Finland? Lutukka 34:115-121 (In Finnish): 'The current status of species is unclear, but there are some unconfirmed observations. However, voucher specimens have not been collected, and the records cannot be verified.'


IDspecies: 15
IDreport: FI-2015-2018
country: FI
EASINCode: R07537
commonNameNational: sumasammakonputki
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/fi/eu/ias/envxs8imw
addInfoSpecies:
The species has been sold in aquarium and garden shops before the legislation came into force, thus it is possible that it still exists in some home aquaria in Finland.


IDspecies: 7
IDreport: MT-2015-2018
country: MT
EASINCode: R05440
commonNameNational: wardet in-Nil [MT]
eradicationMeasures: true
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: unclear
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/mt/eu/ias/envxnq1nw
addInfoSpecies:
This species is found within one site which, is a small temporary water reservoir adjacent to an abandoned structure. The introduction of the species is assumed to be through the pathway 'escape from confinement'.


IDspecies: 32
IDreport: MT-2015-2018
country: MT
EASINCode: R10676
commonNameNational: iċ-ċkala tal-ilma ħelu [MT]
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/mt/eu/ias/envxnq1nw
addInfoSpecies:
The species was recorded at a single location during 2018.  It is assumed that such species had been imported into Malta through the pet/aquarium trade and later released into the environment by their owners. 

It is expected for the specimens to be controlled through an ongoing valley-system regeneration project under ERDF funding. Such project aims at restoring the valley biodiversity as well, as the original valley profile to enhance water storage thereby contributing towards a larger catchment and improved water quality. In this regard, dredging would also be considered during which process the crayfish in the area are expected to be removed. Such actions however, may need to be complemented by additional measures at a later stage to ensure the eradication of the species from the wild. The relevant entities are in discussion in this regard. 


IDspecies: 34
IDreport: MT-2015-2018
country: MT
EASINCode: R03000
commonNameNational: il-pjuma [MT]; il-pjuma ż-żgħira [MT]; il-penniżetum [MT]
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: unclear
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/mt/eu/ias/envxnq1nw
addInfoSpecies:
Species was imported for ornamental purposes and wild populations were established through escapes. The majority of the populations are recorded in urban areas, along roads or in disturbed habitats adjacent to roads. Species is considered to be widely spread in Malta. 


IDspecies: 37
IDreport: MT-2015-2018
country: MT
EASINCode: R12250
commonNameNational: iċ-ċkala tal-Ilma ħelu [MT]
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/mt/eu/ias/envxnq1nw
addInfoSpecies:
It is probable that the species was imported into the Islands through the pet/aquarium trade and later released into the environment by their owners.

It is expected that in one of the valleys the specimens shall be controlled through an ongoing valley-system regeneration project under ERDF funding. Such project aims at restoring the valley biodiversity as well, as the original valley profile to enhance water storage thereby, contributing towards a larger catchment and improved overall water quality. In this regard, dredging will also be considered during which proċess the crayfish in the area are expected to be removed. Such action however, may need to be complemented by additional measures at a later stage to ensure the eradication of the species from the wild. The relevant entities are in discussion in this regard.

Moreover, a method statement is currently being drafted which shall address the removal of crayfish species in other areas, so as to control such species in a holistic manner.   


IDspecies: 38
IDreport: MT-2015-2018
country: MT
EASINCode: R17660
commonNameNational: iċ-ċkala tal-ilma ħelu [MT]
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: asexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/mt/eu/ias/envxnq1nw
addInfoSpecies:
It is assumed that such species had been imported into the Islands through the pet/aquarium trade and later released into the environment by their owners.

A method statement is currently being drafted which shall address the removal of crayfish species so as to control such species in a holistic manner.   


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: MT-2015-2018
country: MT
EASINCode: R18154
commonNameNational: il-fekruna tal-ilma ħelu [MT]; it-terapinn [MT]
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: unknown
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/mt/eu/ias/envxnq1nw
addInfoSpecies:
The species were originally imported through the pet trade and introduced through the release of unwanted specimens.

 A single population is present in a semi-natural water reservoir on the island of Gozo know as l-Għadira ta' Sarraflu where, only adults have been observed. The constraints of the area are such that they make escape or further spread of the species highly difficult. Discussions and plans are underway regarding the trapping and hence removal of such specimens from the area in question.


IDspecies: 37
IDreport: PT-2015-2018
country: PT
EASINCode: R12250
commonNameNational: Lagostim-vermelho-da-Louisiana
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: false
envelope_link: https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pt/eu/ias/envyz_mka
addInfoSpecies:
P.M. Anastácio, F. Banha, C. Capinha, J.M. Bernardo, A.M. Costa, A. Teixeira, S. Bruxelas. Indicators of movemente and space use for two co-occurring invasive crayfish species. Ecological Indicators 53 (2015) 171-181
Anastácio et al 2018. Animais invasores
P.M. Anastácio, F. Ribeiro, C. Capinha, F. Banha,  M. Gameiro, A.F. Filipe, R. Rebelo, R. Sousa. Non-native freshwater fauna in Portugal: A reiew. Science of the total Environment 650 (2019) 1923-1934
F. Banha, A. Diniz, P.M. Anatácio. The role of anglers'perceptions and habits in biological invasions: perspectives from the Iberian Peninsula. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems (2016)
C. Manfrin, C. Souty-Grosset, P. Anastácio, J. Reynolds, P.G. Giulianini. The apparently relentless spread of the major decapod alien species in the mediterranean basin and European inland waters. 2018
C. Souty-Grosset, P. M. Anastácio, L. Aquiloni, F. Banha, J. Choquer, C. Chucholl, E. Tricarico. The red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii in Europe:Impacts on aquatic ecosystems and human well-being. Limnologica 58 (2016) 78-93
C. Souty-Grosset, P. M. Anastácio, J. Reynolds, E. Tricarico . Invasive freshwater invertebrates and fishes: Impacts on human health. (2018) 91-107

The species was captured under the inland fisheries regulations until its revision in 2017.


IDspecies: 46
IDreport: PT-2015-2018
country: PT
EASINCode: R18154
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pt/eu/ias/envyz_mka
addInfoSpecies:
The detention of Trachemys scripta has been prohibited since 1999, with the publication of Decree-Law nº 565/99 of December 21st. Many specimens are delivered to the national authority for the conservation of nature and biodiversity, some having been euthanized, others sent to closed places.
With the aim of halting the loss of biodiversity in 17 coastal habitats in Portugal and Spain, between 2011 and 2015 the LIFE Trachemys Project took place, co-financed by the European Commission and involving several institutions. The application was managed by the Conselleria de Medi Ambient – Generalitat Valenciana, from Spain, and had partners in Portugal: CIBIO-UP, RIAS Olhão and the Parque Biológico de Gaia. In total, 23 thousand invasive tortoises were captured in the wild.
LIFE Project NAT/ES/000582  (INVASEP) “Fight against invasive species in the Tejo and Guadiana river basins in the Iberian Peninsula”, coordinating beneficiary: General Directorate of Environment of the “Consejería” of Agriculture, Rural Development, Environment and Energy of the Government of Extremadura. Partners: Guadiana Hydrographic Confederation, Tejo Hydrographic Confederation, GPEX, EDIA, CICYTEX, AGROFOEX, TRAGSATEC. Collaborators ARH Alentejo and ICNF, I.P.

commonNameNational:
Tartaruga-da-florida;Tartaruga de Faces Rosadas;Tartaruga de Orelha amarellas;Tartaruga de Orelha Vermelha


IDspecies: 47
IDreport: PT-2015-2018
country: PT
EASINCode: R15970
commonNameNational: Vespão-asiático;Vespa-asiática;Vespa-velutina
eradicationMeasures: false
permitsIssued: false
present: true
reproductionPattern: sexual
managementMeasures: true
envelope_link: https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/pt/eu/ias/envyz_mka
addInfoSpecies:
In September 2011, in the region of Viana do Castelo, the invasive species Vespa velutina (Asian hornet) was confirmed for the first time in Portugal by entomologists and beekeepers. From there the nuclei expanded throughout the Northwest and Center of Portugal. Since then, the species has been progressing along the Portuguese mainland, preferably along the coast. The evolution towards the interior of the country has been slower, taking place mainly along watercourse beds, with particular emphasis on the river basins of the Tejo and Douro. 
In 2015, the “Action Plan for the Surveillance and Control of Vespa velutina” was developed jointly by DGAV (animal and plant health national authority) and ICNF, I.P.(national authority for nature conservation and biodiversity), with the contribution of INIAV (national agronomic and veterinarian research institute) and FNAP (national beekeepers association). This Plan, publicly presented in January 2015, was revised in January 2018.
In addition to coordinating together with the DGAV, among the ICNF's attributions within the scope of this Plan is the responsibility for managing the information resulting from passive surveillance, through the STOPvespa platform (http://stopvespa.icnf.pt/), which brings together information on hornets’ and nests’ sightings and their destruction by municipalities.
Reports of sightings of Asian hornets and their nests are made by filling out an online form by citizens. By accessing the link, a page opens with information about this online tool. All registrations made by citizens give rise to a notification, via e-mail, to the municipalities to which they relate. Each notification email includes a reference that later serves for the municipality to view that record on the map and access the respective information.
The Action Plan includes a training program that, simultaneously, acts like an awareness campaign. Direct training has already been provided to circa 1000 people nationally that, on their initiative, are providing training at the municipality level.
Volunteer work is also being used in several actions, always with a strong component on awareness
https://stopvespa.icnf.pt/
ICNF has been cooperating in sharing information about the Asian hornet, providing STOPvespa’s data to researchers. Following this collaboration, an article was recently published:
Carvalho, João; Hippolytus, D.; Santarém, F.; Martins, R.; Gomes, A.; Carmo, P.; Rodrigues, R.; Silva, J.; Fonseca, C. "Patterns of Vespa velutina invasion in Portugal using crowdsourced data". Insect Conservation and Diversity (2020) 


