• EEA geospatial data catalogue
  •   Search
  •   Map
  •  Sign in

EUNIS habitat type F7.3, predicted habitat suitability - version 1, June 2016

The modelled suitability for the EUNIS habitat type is an indication of where conditions are favourable for the habitat type based on sample plot data (Braun-Blanquet database) and the Maxent software package. The modelled suitability map may be used as a proxy for the geographical distribution of the habitat type. Note however that it is not representing the actual distribution of the habitat type.

Also note that predictions are less reliable due to data deficiency in the eastern part of Europe, and to a lesser extent to the Scandinavian countries.

Geographic restriction for plot observations: n/a

Remarks: Prediction in the Iberian Penissula should be ignored.

Simple

Identification info

Date (Publication)
2016-07-01
Date (Creation)
2016-07-06
Edition

01

Citation identifier
eea_r_3035_1_km_eunis-hab-f7-3_p_1940-2011_v01_r00

Status
Obsolete
Point of contact
Organisation Individual Electronic mail address Website Role

European Environment Agency

sdi@eea.europa.eu

http://www.eea.europa.eu

Point of contact

European Environment Agency

sdi@eea.europa.eu

Custodian
Spatial representation type
Grid

Spatial resolution

Spatial resolution
1 km
Topic category
  • Biota

Extent

N
S
E
W




Extent

Temporal extent

Time period
1940-01-01 2011-12-31
Maintenance and update frequency
Unknown
EEA topics
  • Biodiversity

GEMET - INSPIRE themes, version 1.0
  • Habitats and biotopes

GEMET
  • terrestrial ecosystem

  • natural area

  • tundra

  • heathland

Place
  • Europe

Resource constraints

Use constraints
Other restrictions
Other constraints

License CC-BY 4.0 ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Copyright holder: European Environment Agency (EEA).

Resource constraints

Access constraints
Other restrictions
Other constraints
no limitations to public access
Language
English
Character encoding
UTF8

Distribution Information

Distribution format
  • GeoTIFF

OnLine resource

https://sdi.eea.europa.eu/webdav/datastore/public/eea_r_3035_1_km_eunis-hab-f7-3_p_1940-2011_v01_r00/

OnLine resource

Direct download

Data quality info

Hierarchy level
Dataset

Report

Result

Title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services

Date (Publication)
2010-12-08
Explanation

See the referenced specification

Resource lineage

Statement

The database compiled for the Braun-Blanquet project is a compilation of various national and regional vegetation databases. The maintenance of these databases is in principle in the hands of the custodians. However, before uploading the databases into Braun-Blanquet database a quality check is performed by Alterra and Masaryk University. If possible, detected errors are corrected and reported back to the data provider. For the modelling of the habitat suitability map the Maxent software is used ( https://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/). The grid values in the map represent the probability (ranging from 0-1) that the cell is suitable for the habitat.

The grid file represents the habitat suitability of the EUNIS type. For the modelling the widely used software Maxent for maximum entropy modelling of species’ geographic distributions was used. Maxent is a general-purpose machine-learning method with a simple and precise mathematical formulation, and has a number of aspects that make it well-suited for species distribution modelling when only presence (occurrence) data but not absence data are available (Philips et al. 2006). Because EUNIS habitats have a particular species composition, they are assumed to respond to specific ecological requirements, allowing us to generate correlative estimates of geographic distributions. Modelling habitats that have been floristically defined is a well-known procedure for ecological modelling at local scales, and a promising technique to be applied also at the continental level.

The Maxent method considers presence data (known observations of a given entity) and the so-called background data. Background data comprise a set of points used to describe the environmental variation of the study area according to the available environmental layers. It is assumed that these layers represent well the most important ecological gradients on a European scale. As layers the following environmental parameters have been used: Potential Evapotranspiration, Topsoil pH, Solar radiation, Temperature Seasonality (standard deviation *100), Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarter, Annual Precipitation, Precipitation Seasonality (Coefficient of Variation), Precipitation of Warmest Quarter & Distance to water (rivers, lakes, sea).

Statistical output of the model:

#Training samples: 54

Regularized training gain: 3.6547

Unregularized training gain: 3.9416

Iterations: 500

Training AUC: 0.9935

#Test samples: 5

Test gain: 3.456

Test AUC: 0.9902

AUC Standard Deviation: 0.002

#Background points: 5054

bio_12_etrs2_ras contribution: 0

bio_15_etrs2_ras contribution: 49.1531

bio_18_etrs2_ras contribution: 23.7552

bio_4_etrs2_ras contribution: 13.0809

bio_8_etrs2_ras contribution: 0.1344

bld_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 0.1621

cecsum_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 0.0163

clyppt_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 1.3448

crfvol_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 0.2328

dist2water1km contribution: 0.0032

orcdrc_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 1.0544

pet_he_yr contribution: 10.193

phihox_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 0.6572

sltppt_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 0.0147

sndppt_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll contribution: 0.0856

solar_1km contribution: 0.1124

bio_12_etrs2_ras permutation importance: 0

bio_15_etrs2_ras permutation importance: 66.3024

bio_18_etrs2_ras permutation importance: 0.1262

bio_4_etrs2_ras permutation importance: 23.4347

bio_8_etrs2_ras permutation importance: 0.3119

bld_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 0.1595

cecsum_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 0.0405

clyppt_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 0.0262

crfvol_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 0.6285

dist2water1km permutation importance: 0

orcdrc_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 1.2308

pet_he_yr permutation importance: 2.7829

phihox_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 3.6757

sltppt_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 0.8761

sndppt_m_sd1_1km_eu_ll permutation importance: 0.0595

solar_1km permutation importance: 0.3452

Entropy: 4.8843

Prevalence (average of logistic output over background sites): 0.0121

Fixed cumulative value 1 cumulative threshold: 1

Fixed cumulative value 1 logistic threshold: 0.0036

Fixed cumulative value 1 area: 0.1173

Fixed cumulative value 1 training omission: 0

Fixed cumulative value 1 test omission: 0

Fixed cumulative value 1 binomial probability: 2.22E-05

Fixed cumulative value 5 cumulative threshold: 5

Fixed cumulative value 5 logistic threshold: 0.0458

Fixed cumulative value 5 area: 0.0386

Fixed cumulative value 5 training omission: 0

Fixed cumulative value 5 test omission: 0

Fixed cumulative value 5 binomial probability: 8.55E-08

Fixed cumulative value 10 cumulative threshold: 10

Fixed cumulative value 10 logistic threshold: 0.1365

Fixed cumulative value 10 area: 0.0239

Fixed cumulative value 10 training omission: 0

Fixed cumulative value 10 test omission: 0

Fixed cumulative value 10 binomial probability: 7.87E-09

Minimum training presence cumulative threshold: 12.7992

Minimum training presence logistic threshold: 0.1708

Minimum training presence area: 0.0198

Minimum training presence training omission: 0

Minimum training presence test omission: 0

Minimum training presence binomial probability: 3.03E-09

10 percentile training presence cumulative threshold: 19.3516

10 percentile training presence logistic threshold: 0.2726

10 percentile training presence area: 0.014

10 percentile training presence training omission: 0.0926

10 percentile training presence test omission: 0.2

10 percentile training presence binomial probability: 1.93E-07

Equal training sensitivity and specificity cumulative threshold: 13.1147

Equal training sensitivity and specificity logistic threshold: 0.1738

Equal training sensitivity and specificity area: 0.0194

Equal training sensitivity and specificity training omission: 0.0185

Equal training sensitivity and specificity test omission: 0

Equal training sensitivity and specificity binomial probability: 2.74E-09

Maximum training sensitivity plus specificity cumulative threshold: 12.7992

Maximum training sensitivity plus specificity logistic threshold: 0.1708

Maximum training sensitivity plus specificity area: 0.0198

Maximum training sensitivity plus specificity training omission: 0

Maximum training sensitivity plus specificity test omission: 0

Maximum training sensitivity plus specificity binomial probability: 3.03E-09

Equal test sensitivity and specificity cumulative threshold: 15.5867

Equal test sensitivity and specificity logistic threshold: 0.2255

Equal test sensitivity and specificity area: 0.0168

Equal test sensitivity and specificity training omission: 0.037

Equal test sensitivity and specificity test omission: 0

Equal test sensitivity and specificity binomial probability: 1.35E-09

Maximum test sensitivity plus specificity cumulative threshold: 15.5867

Maximum test sensitivity plus specificity logistic threshold: 0.2255

Maximum test sensitivity plus specificity area: 0.0168

Maximum test sensitivity plus specificity training omission: 0.037

Maximum test sensitivity plus specificity test omission: 0

Maximum test sensitivity plus specificity binomial probability: 1.35E-09

Balance training omission, predicted area and threshold value cumulative threshold: 2.0977

Balance training omission, predicted area and threshold value logistic threshold: 0.0103

Balance training omission, predicted area and threshold value area: 0.073

Balance training omission, predicted area and threshold value training omission: 0

Balance training omission, predicted area and threshold value test omission: 0

Balance training omission, predicted area and threshold value binomial probability: 2.08E-06

Equate entropy of thresholded and original distributions cumulative threshold: 8.8366

Equate entropy of thresholded and original distributions logistic threshold: 0.1086

Equate entropy of thresholded and original distributions area: 0.0261

Equate entropy of thresholded and original distributions training omission: 0

Equate entropy of thresholded and original distributions test omission: 0

Equate entropy of thresholded and original distributions binomial probability: 1.21E-08

Hierarchy level
Dataset
Source
  • EUNIS habitat type F7-3 distribution based on vegetation plot data - version 1, June 2016

Reference System Information

Reference System Information

Code
EPSG:3035

Metadata

Metadata identifier
4e5fa870-cd3b-4b2b-aceb-c1bbb80fcf5d

Language
English
Character encoding
UTF8
Contact
Organisation Individual Electronic mail address Website Role

European Environment Agency

sdi@eea.europa.eu

Point of contact

Type of resource

Resource type
Dataset
Metadata linkage

https://sdi.eea.europa.eu/catalogue/srv/api/records/4e5fa870-cd3b-4b2b-aceb-c1bbb80fcf5d

Date info (Creation)
2016-06-15T13:21:59Z
Date info (Revision)
2025-10-09T10:49:44.911881Z

Metadata standard

Title

ISO 19115/19139

Edition

1.0

 
 
Access to the catalogue
Read here the full details and access to the data.

Overviews

Spatial extent

Keywords

EEA topics

Biodiversity
GEMET

heathland natural area terrestrial ecosystem tundra
GEMET - INSPIRE themes, version 1.0

Habitats and biotopes


Provided by

Access to the catalogue
Read here the full details and access to the data.




  •   About
  •   Github
  •